Arts & Entertainment

Rave

Working To Change The MPAA’s Rating Of “Bully”.

Posted 15 months ago|8 comments|377 views
VIDEOS
Written by
A few years back, I found myself writing a letter to the corporate office of our local movie theater chain because they refused admission to a seventeen-year-old that wanted to see a movie that was rated "R" with a group of his older friends. I worked at a movie theater for many years, at one point in management, so I was certain that I understood the Motion Picture Association of America's ratings scale and angry to learn that the young man had been turned away at the box office. It turns out that, despite national advertising, local ordinances can be different from the MPAA's recommendation. Moviegoers in my area have to be eighteen years old before they can see an R-rated movie without a parent or guardian.

The whole point of the ratings system is to help parents determine what they think is appropriate material for their children to see or not to see. But, the MPAA has given the new documentary Bully an "R-Restricted" rating, allegedly, because it contains profanity. This has outraged anti-bullying advocates who insist that the rating should be "PG-13" so that more kids can see the film in schools and theaters without parents having to take them. This, they believe, is the audience that NEEDS to learn the message that this movie brings to light.

The trailer for "Bully" is below ...

Many people are fighting to get the rating changed including celebrities like Demi Lavato, Drew Brees and Ellen DeGeneres. An online petition to change the rating, in addition to the national attention that has been brought to the decision, has prompted an unusual Washington, DC panel and screening later this week. The "R" rating is said to be based on profane language, which appears primarily in a scene where a bully threatens a victim.

"There is some language in the movie. It's mature but it's not gratuitous because it's part of the real story of bullying and it's real language that bullies are using -- but having an R rating makes it difficult for anyone under 17 to see it. After seeing it, I can tell you that the lessons that the kids learn from this movie are more important than any words that they might hear -- and they're words that they know already anyway." – Ellen DeGeneres

Needless to say, the Parents Television Council applauded the MPAA's rating which brings even more attention to the debate. (I'll never understand why they get more worked up about sex and language than they do over violence, drugs and killing.)

Regardless of the outcome, I certainly hope that pre-teens and other children get to see this movie and that it will influence their thinking when it comes to the problem of bullying. Some of the young bullies causing problems in the world might not even know that they ARE bullies. And this movie could be the thing that makes them understand the consequences of their actions.

Do you think the rating should be changed so more youngsters can see Bully?

Copyright © 2012 www.DiatribesAndOvations.com
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
15 months ago: Wonderful post!

I agree 100% that the MPAA is way too concerned with language and sex and not concerned enough about violence, drugs, and killing.

Kids would benefit greatly from this movie and it should be seen in all of the schools. Of course that is not possible with an "R" rating.

The offensive language in the movie helps determine the context and is necessary for the narrative. Kids hear this every day from their peers and itt will not warp any impressionable young minds.

It is not the language but the violence of the bullying this movie is designed to fight that harms young kids.
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
15 months ago: I really don't think pofanity should be overlooked to get a message through to young minds. Here's a novel idea: instead of changing the rules to accommodate one group, produce a version that would fit the accepted guidelines for a PG film.

As far as showing it in schools without the parent's permission, I don't send my child to school to be indoctrinated, only educated. In the sixth grade, I was forced to watch a rather gruesome depiction of the life and crucifixion of Jesus. The film was screened in the school auditorium and attendance was mandatory. The people running the school and the majority of the parents obviously thought it was an important part of my education.

What do you think about that?
15 months ago: I think that, unless you attended a private school, it was against federal law for the school to force you and your classmates to watch the film about Jesus!

I agree with a revision to get a PG-13 rating. I think it's more important that youngsters hear the message than any foul language.

None of us send our children to school to be "indoctrinated". Nor do we send them to school to be bullied. In my opinion, an informative documentary to help students better understand the consequences of bullying can do no harm.

I don't know what "one group" you reference, but a PG-13 rating would make the movie's message accessible to thousands of potential young bullies (not necessarily in a school setting) that might learn to alter their behavior.
15 months ago: "I think that, unless you attended a private school, it was against federal law for the school to force you and your classmates to watch the film about Jesus!"

Is it against federal law to force school children to watch a movie about any other religious leader? I don't think so.

The double standards and hypocrisy of this society never cease to amaze me.

Revise the movie so that it falls within the acceptable guidelines of a PG or PG-13 movie instead of looking to get some type of a privileged status or a pass because of the subject matter.

Should not be that complicated and should not be a big deal either.

http://www.rantrave.com/Rave/The-Solutio...

Get the message out and stop playing politics. Packaged the right way, this film may save the young people some very avoidable pain and suffering. Life is hard enough.
15 months ago: Public schools cannot endorse any one religion. If Out Of The Box and her/her classmates were also forced to watch movies about Allah and Buddah, then I stand corrected.

I agree with your assessment to revise the movie so that it gets a different rating.

I think it's unfair to compare the bullying that happens to today's youth with bullying in the past. In the past, the victims could run away. They could hide and seek solace in a safe place. In today's world, a safe place rarely exists and they can suffer from virtual attacks that exist in cyberspace forever. Today's world offers an entirely new set of problems and, unfortunately, the media shows troubled youth that suicide is an option that previous generations were not necessarily aware of.

Since parents (adults) aren't doing enough to stop their children from bullying other children, the kids should be afforded an opportunity to educate each other. Maybe movies like this documentary will help.
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
15 months ago: Parents (adults) are setting the tone for their children's bullying. Look at the political process, it's full of it. When the nation's highest office is occupied by a bullier, who ridicules those who disagree with him, and the children are told that they are to look up to him as a hero, you have planted the idea that the way to deal with differences is to bully others.

When you have authoritative comedians like Jon Stewart, Bill Maher, and Steve Colbert, who most Liberals get their news from these days, getting big laughs and big bucks from deriding their ideological counterparts, how can you expect any different from the kids who watch their inane drivel?

Not only do the kids' mindsets need to change. As it has been said, most are not even aware of the lasting harm they are causing. They are just looking for a cheap laugh, a good put down to counter a threat to their own way of thinking. Another way of dealing with it is to educate the kids on the causes of bullying, to give them tools to deal with being on the receiving end of bullying.

And for the kids' sake, the pundits need to set a better example.

15 months ago: I agree. Pundits on both sides need to set better examples.
15 months ago: "Public schools cannot endorse any one religion. If Out Of The Box and her/her classmates were also forced to watch movies about Allah and Buddah, then I stand corrected."

Fact of the matter is, High School kids are forced to watch movies about different religions all the times. It just a shame that in this country where religious liberty is touted so strongly the powers that be are bigoted and afraid of Jesus Christ.

Any figure, religious or otherwise, can be held up in high esteem and discussed extensively in public schools. That is everyone other than Jesus Christ. Try it and all the loonies come out of the woodwork foaming at the mouth. That's a fact.

Only with Jesus does it become an "endorsement" of religion even at the mere mention of his name. That's a hypocritical, it's wrong and it goes on all the time whether folks want to openly admit it or not.

On the bullying note, the parents need to play more attention to what their children are involved in, who their kids hang out with on-line and outside of the home. Just those two steps would prevent much of the bullying that goes on.

These kids that get messed over have little self esteem, are confused on a multiplicity of issues, and have been taught that they have no hope or purpose in life anyway. Most have no idea why they are even on the planet in the first place so rather than deal with the pain, in weakness they kill themselves. That's tragic and avoidable.

When parents let the secular humanist educational system, social media and their youngster's peer group have a greater impact and influence than they do, they have abdicated their responsibilities and it's no wonder their kids end up victims instead of victors.

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.