Arts & Entertainment

Rave

Uncovered: Book By Jordan Matter

Posted 34 months ago|3 comments|3,618 views
Written by
Tina W
Portland, OR
Can breasts be more than just boobs? I say yes, they can.

Jordan Matter is a New York photographer. His new book, Uncovered, shows 80 women topless in New York City. But it’s not porn.

The porn and entertainment industries have sexualized breasts (which are meant to feed babies!) and turned them into something to stare at, but Jordan Matter’s Uncovered is meant to battle that stereotype.

Jordan Matter took pictures of women in the streets and parks in New York for more than six years, challenging fears and American culture. The book’s reviews say that many of the women wrote text to go along with their pictures and gave interviews. None of the models were paid for their photos, and some of the preview pictures of Uncovered show a “realistic” portrayal of the female body, not the fake ones that are in Cosmo and Redbook.

The Uncovered book goes for 45 bucks on Amazon, but it’s 100% sold out right now. I haven’t seen a copy yet, but there are a few preview pages on Jordan Matter’s website.

One more good thing about the Uncovered book: 10% of the sales are donated to a nonprofit that is fighting sexual slavery in Asia. That alone makes me want to buy a copy.

(You can see more about the Uncovered book at the link on the left.
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
34 months ago: Why are you knocking Cosmo and Redbook? Neither magazine is a fashion magazine, which is typically the kind of publication that shows "unrealistic" waif-like images of women's bodies. In fact, Cosmo's web site has a story on Jordan Matter on their front page. http://www.cosmopolitan.com/advice/tips/jordan-matter-uncovered

Stop going for the easy punch. It makes you a weak writer.
34 months ago: uhhh
Tina.
We men....uh....well......uh..... we have a different perspective than you women..... Bless you women by the way.....
34 months ago: Nice post Tina. Without the spice from contributors such as yourself and others such as Siempre (yes Siempre you do much in this respect) we would have a pretty dull and dreary political debating site (it seems breasts are among the few things that can get us away from politics, go figure).
My take on this is that in many civilizations throughout history women had the same right to go topless as men and both did so as the weather was more bearable this way. I suspect it is because breasts were considered more as a utility for feeding babies (as you mentioned) than as sexual items.
This of course places modern man in a dilemma. I suspect most modern men would love to have the situation of which women who dared could go topless in places such as a public parks etc.. But I feel this would ultimately lead to breasts becoming less interesting to men as a result. In Victorian times it has been said that men would be "aroused" by the sight of a woman's ankle, which they by the way seldom seen. Seems it is the old "desiring what you can't have" in play here.

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.