Science & Technology

Rave

Uncommon Descent

Posted 11 months ago|11 comments|598 views
FREE THINKER?
VIDEOS
Written by
"Darwin's theory of evolution is the great white elephant of contemporary thought. It is large, almost completely useless, and the object of superstitious awe." Dr. David Berlinski
http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/

"The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection."
http://www.intelligentdesign.org/

"Uncommon Descent holds that… Materialistic ideology has subverted the study of biological and cosmological origins so that the actual content of these sciences has become corrupted. The problem, therefore, is not merely that science is being used illegitimately to promote a materialistic worldview, but that this worldview is actively undermining scientific inquiry, leading to incorrect and unsupported conclusions about biological and cosmological origins. At the same time, intelligent design (ID) offers a promising scientific alternative to materialistic theories of biological and cosmological evolution — an alternative that is finding increasing theoretical and empirical support.
http://www.uncommondescent.com/

THE above 3 sites dig deep into the reality of what we see, and the philosophy of what we are taught. While the theories expressed in school may not be classified as philosophy, the "evidences" sited to uphold evolution... are the very same that establish creationism or intelligent design. So which side is right?

THE only possible way of determining for one's self, is to follow where the evidence leads. Though from the outset, if we are schooled by the State; is to be biased in the evolutionary mindset. That being said, one has little to loose when considering the evidence... and only a better perspective to gain, if not only to establish further our "original" bent. However, if one finds that all the "thinking" has been done for us already, and all that is required is to give the "rubber-stamp" of consent... "thinking" ...or not, is the least of one's problems... and one should consider integrity.

ARE the Intelligent Design or Creationism views merely causing trouble? What should it matter if CHOICE is available to test one's theories? The truth itself won't change! OR is there a greater game afoot? Has schooling become more indoctrination than that of education? ...and educators more prognosticators; telling us things are evolving to something better when all evidence shouts the opposite? Why are certain books banned from libraries... will there be a honest "coming out" of communism in the West?

WHAT would you have to loose if you found out that the Universe was designed?
WOULD you loose your freedoms to an all-powerful Creator?
YOU are only responsible to the truth.
DO your own thinking !:]

THINK for yourself and let others do the same.
UPDATE - 1 month ago
"Don't Waste Your Life" by John Piper
http://dwynrhh6bluza.cloudfront.net/reso...
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
Frederick
Frederick
Canada
11 months ago: And how do we go about doing our own thinking? I have read Evolution of the Species. I have read critiques on it. I have read the Bible and critiques on it. I am still short on the books left behind by the Gods of Hinduism, the Muslim faith and the many other religions. I have read Dianetics The Modern Science of Mental Health though.

In short, the world is a complicated place.
11 months ago: The world is a very complicated place.

People make it even more so when they act like there is no such thing as objective truth and that every teaching under the sun should be tolerated other than that which has eternal significance.
11 months ago: Simple, Truth is a person...

Jesus said to him, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." (John 14:6)

...one cannot just "read" Jesus, one must experience Him.
11 months ago: In broad, general strokes, Darwin's theory has complex life grow from more simple life. Now that we have some fossil records, we can see that simple little creatures happened before complex creatures, happened before monkeys, happened before man. And this same increase of complexity can be found in the plant kingdom, as well.

Darwin could be wrong in fine details, which he had only a little data about. Compared to our larger database today. But is broad idea was a turning point in how people thought about Life. Before Darwin .. Life was static and didn't evolve. After Darwin, Life is dynamic, evolving to fit a changing environment.

Intelligent design simply says these dynamic changes happen much too quickly to be pure chance. Life forms evolve more quickly than statistics predicts, much more quickly. And this means there is something not yet known about Life, some urge for survival, some intelligence that cause tiny betterments in following generations. Betterments that result in a better survival. But this does not actually conflict with Darwin's broad, general recognition that Life is dynamic and evolving.
Content Removed by Huey Newton
11 months ago: The human transitional "fossil" record is a joke.

Humans have always been just that, HUMAN.

Most of the time they don't even bother to show you the meager fragments and pieces of bones they have found scattered for miles to compile one-eighth of a monkey man skeleton. Invariable some poor extinct, and obviously non-human, ape is discovered and used.

Another tactic employed to promulgate this lie is the creation illustrations and dioramas to "show us how it was." A tooth becomes a village and a jawbone an entire skeleton.

A literal parade of fakes and non-human fragments are continuously used to substantiate a myth that only the most gullible or ignorant can possibly believe. Wow.

Behold YOUR relatives...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe3utnBqU...

Then on top of that some monkeys want to say they are the most evolved monkeys. Get real.

Anyone who really believes that crap needs to have their head examined. Seriously.

11 months ago: Again...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe3utnBqU...

Any better this time around???
11 months ago: Terryeo,

You said... "Before Darwin .. Life was static and didn't evolve"
...I have to agree !:]
11 months ago: Pretty much the way it is now !:]
11 months ago: Where's the opposition TB?

TO took a stab at it. Post and run.

Any other takers?

---> 00 <---
V
/------\

Hmm?
11 months ago: Well... it seems we might be getting through !:]
11 months ago: These things work pretty good....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sledgehamme...

Just have to dust them off every now and then.

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.