Offbeat

Rave

Topless Women not wanting attention equals Army of Cameras

Posted 22 months ago|24 comments|5,101 views
Don't Look at my Naked Breasts You Cads!
Written by
markbyrn
 Moderator
When the long cold winter finally breaks and summer like temperatures hits the Northeast, it can only mean one thing. It mean feminists in Maine have the opportunity to strike a blow for equality of the sexes by marching down the streets of Portland topless.

As quoted in the Portland Press Herald, the point of the march was that a topless woman out in public should attract no more attention than a man walking around without a shirt on, said Ty MacDowell, 20, of Westbrook, who organized Saturday's event and promoted it on Facebook.

Sure enough, like ants making a beeline to sugar and to the chagrin of MacDowell, the topless ladies attracted armies of bug eyed men with camera's a clicking and cell phone's a blinking. MacDowell was was not only amazed but enraged and upset that that a wall of men were not only ogling but taking pictures.

But like any other true zealot for the cause, MacDowell was not deterred, and received much encouragement to continue her efforts to ensure that women have the same opportunity as men to expose their breasts without undue attention.
Perhaps a day will come when women can walk the street topless and receive only feigned disinterest from male passerby's.

http://www.pressherald.com/news/marching...
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
22 months ago: I'm going to resist several puns.

But, hey, what's with keeping the pants on? What are they trying to hide? Are they fundamentalist islamists or something?

Historically, in warm places, toplessness and bottomlessness have been norms for great expanses of time, I am informed. National Geographic says so, too. I also understand that many people are born unclothed.

Tips for marchers - get men to join in so this display doesn't seem sexist. Also, use sunscreen.
TheLegendTomWing
TheLegendTomWing
 Administrator
Philadelphia, PA
22 months ago:
I also understand that many people are born unclothed.

HILARIOUS!
22 months ago: I suspect this is one fight for rights men all over will join hand (the other will be needed for a camera) with the feminists on. Actually I would not be surprised if groups of men got together and encouraged these feminists to rally together and have topless parades to prove their point. I suggest pictures will only be taken to prove the event happened.
Very interesting Mark, thanks for that contribution.
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
22 months ago: If the amount of skin exposed is correlated with a person's freedom than more power to them. But it seems that the less a woman wears the more men tend to objectify the woman.

Muslim women wearing a Hijab claim that they feel more free, because they aren't judged by their looks or lack thereof. They are judged on their abilities, their intellect, their personalities. They feel liberated.
See:http://www.islamfortoday.com/hijabcanada4.htm

American women are made to feel that if they do not wear the "hot" clothing, the right makeup, the right kind of sexy underwear, the right kinds of shoes, that they are less than dirt. They are held in bondage by the editors of Playboy and Vogue.

The cosmetic industry, the fashion industry, the magazine industry, The movie and TV industry, and the cosmetic surgery industry, all glorify an impossible ideal, of a wasp waisted, Anemic, Barbie Doll figure, that no woman can match.

These industries make millions of dollars by making women feel terrible about their bodies and their looks. Even the most beautiful of women are insecure. They think their noses, butts, or their breasts are not big enough or too big or one is larger than the other. They are giving all women an inferiority complex.

I can see why women would protest this objectification by refusing to wear the clothes, makeup, bras, etc. but as you state, the protest is counterproductive. It does bring attention to the cause but perhaps the wrong type of attention.

22 months ago: Is it true that photographers from Nairobi Geographic were present so that kids in Africa might go to their local libraries to see what pendulous white dugs look like?
Siempre Solo
Siempre Solo
Auburn, NY
22 months ago: lol
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
22 months ago: I see what they are up to. They don't want men going to a strip club to look at boobies, so they are trying to flood the open market.
Siempre Solo
Siempre Solo
Auburn, NY
22 months ago: Given the simple fact that a womans body should be atractive to a man, I will not apologize for ogoling at naked breast when they are put out there for me to see. Would I take pictures? No! Would I stop and stare? No! Would I look as I pass? Yes, but that is the extent of it. There is no way a feminist is going to desexualize boobies in the brain of healthy males. No way. I teach my male kids to respect women with the same amount of respect as they would expect for themselves but they are not going to see a womans chest as less facinating just because soome leftwing femenist kook told him too. This is America. Keep trying ladies!

Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
22 months ago: Dead on, Siempre.

That goes for women and men too. Women do their fair share ogling men, it's only natural.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdrE1VMxz...
22 months ago: I'll second (or third, I see OOTB beat me to second) that Siempre. I think any normal woman would be concerned when men stop noticing. I know there is this feminist thing of women being idealized at to high of standards but I think that is a bunch of poo. I have had male friends or rather associates which would oogle anything with boobies, so I feel all women get oogled from time to time. I also feel that even though men should not "lust" after a woman a fair amount of admiration for a healthy female is natural from a healthy male. Plus a woman should not be in my opinion purposely "provocative" but I don't feel she has to feel bad if she gets oogled by a man unless she is being provocative. I think normal women like to feel attractive (not provocative) and normal men appreciate and admire a pretty female. What these women are doing in my opinion is being provocative and when women are provocative they will indeed provoke a response from men.
Siempre Solo
Siempre Solo
Auburn, NY
22 months ago: This is why sex outside of heterosexual marriage is problematic. Men are biologically programmed to be attracted to females, despite what gay agenda proponents insist. The cycle of life dictates that at a certain age in a mans life he should seek out a mate and begin the process of reproduction. Today's promiscuously sexually liberal society dictates that sex is for fun only and so people can go about boinking whatever they see fit, never mind that such promiscuity opens that individual to STD's and abnormal sexual appetite but it also creates a schism between sex and reproduction.

Such a schism is what creates this notion that breasts are or aren't sexual. A wife's breasts are sexual to her husband. A married man refrains from finding a woman's breasts sexual outside of marriage because he is married. A single man needs no such refrain if he is seeking out a mate. The whole process of seeking out a mate or being involved in a monogamous heterosexual relationship is the rules that prevent women from becoming sexual objects. A society needs not resort to extremism such as with Islam that covers their woman from head to toe, nor does it need to force their woman to walk around naked either. It is the rite of marriage and the cycles around it that regulate how individuals of opposite sexes should demonstrate approval of each others bodies.
Chris D
Chris D
Seattle, WA
22 months ago: Siempre wrote:

Men are biologically programmed to be attracted to females, despite what gay agenda proponents insist.

You know, friend, there is no secret "gay agenda." Not all men are attracted to women. Not all women are attracted to men. I don't mean to be rude, but have you ever met a gay man or woman? Have you shared a meal with someone who is gay? I think you might find that your assumptions are a little off-base.
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
22 months ago: Actually, I have read about certain influences on hormonal behavior in homosexuals that are treatable.

http://www.nytimes.com/1984/09/21/us/hom...

The finding is consistent with previous research indicating that prenatal hormonal influences in mammals can affect later sexual orientation. In these earlier studies, the fetal hormone exposure led to lifelong changes in physiology and behavior.
22 months ago: Does kayaking count?
Siempre Solo
Siempre Solo
Auburn, NY
Content Removed by Siempre Solo
Siempre Solo
Siempre Solo
Auburn, NY
22 months ago: Chris D.

I think it's fascinating how complete and utter common sense, logic and scientific absolutes can be thrown right out the window just to fit in within cultural trends. Since we are on friendly terms let me ask you without being rude either:
Why do you assume that I know no people who practice homosexual behavior?

Why do you assume that all people who engage in such acts want to be part of a community ?

Why do you assume that such behavior is unchangeable, when the vast majority of men who engage in it have also engaged in successful heterosexual relationships for the majority of their lives before deciding to participate exclusively in homosexual acts?

Why is it all or nothing for the gay community ?

Why are bisexuals ostracized politically and culturally from gay events but are used in bolstering numbers?

Why does the homosexual community downplay the viewpoint of bisexuals who insist on their right to choose between male and female and for the most part say they came to a realization of their bisexual desires rather than go with the defacto agenda statement, "I was born that way."

Here is the little spoken truth. Gay is not a state of being. It is a behavior. It is chosen either gradually or abruptly and many factors can lead people towards choosing such behavior. Some of it may be environmental and some biological but not until it is medically researched will society know by just how much. Today there is a massive agenda to force a cultural change in the role gay behavior and activities play in society at large.

To deny this is to willfully blind yourself to the cultural shifts that have occurred since the 1920's but more specifically the stonewall riots. That there are people who want to make a lifestyle out of a physical act does not detract that they do not represent the silent ones who wish to keep their sexual practices private. There is an agenda and it wants to claim to speak for everyone because the silent ones don't want to speak up for obvious reasons.

Regardless however, it is an insult to the intelligence of the common person to ignore obvious factors such as people who participate in homosexual behavior in private, people who are bisexual, people who have been straight all their lives and then begin to exhibit homosexual tendencies. People who went on to live bisexual or heterosexual lives after living a gay one. It is insulting because the agenda viewpoint is all or nothing and I for one remember from biology class that in nature biology doesn't always go right.

As a matter of fact the whole process of evolution is based upon errors in the genetic code that have produced advantageous or beneficial results. But that these positive results are very rare and that the majority of genetic errors are just that errors. So you see, even if a male is born with the genetic propensity to boink another male, unless it produces beneficial or advantageous results it is still a genetic flaw. It is highly more likely that an increase in sexual hormones that were introduced through dietary means along with societal and personal choices lead or may lead an individual to forsake natural behavior for an abnormal one.

By the way, please don't mention Jesus or religion because I haven't made my argument on a philosophical foundation so don't make it into one.
22 months ago: Some very interesting angles there Siempre. I wish I had more time for input but here is something else that seems a bit off. I also am not trying to put down anyone but consider this. The "gay activists" (not all gays) portray being gay as a genetic flaw when it is advantageous to do so. So in effect if this is true then it should be considered a defect from birth such as being born blind or such. Now at the same time they organize and promote "gay pride" parades, days etc. So I am scratching my head and thinking, if it is a defect fine you do not have to be ashamed. However I do not see people born blind or deaf having "born blind pride parades" etc. It seems the parades are more about "lifestyle". Again similar to points you made Siempre. For persons not wishing to be forced into "condoning" homosexuality as "natural" the gay activists appear to switch from genetic flaw and lifestyle as it pleases them. Personally what two adults do in privacy is their business in my opinion but I also see a push for laws to make everyone accept and condone homosexuality or be a law breaker.
22 months ago: I would just laugh and tip my hat until I could look back at those nasty butts.

That is truly one of the worst pictures of butts I have ever seen.

I just hurled dinner. Thanks. My hurl looks better than those wide-body butts looking for attention. I think someone should throw bananna peels in front of them to make them slip and scuff a teet ot two (would that be toots?). Then call EMS to resuscitate the lost/injured member(s).
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
22 months ago: When whites first came to Hawaii all of the women were topless. It is a very natural thing in warm climates. Of course the priests were scandalized and made it their mission to get them brassieres. The native men had no problem with their women's nakedness and they did not molest them or attack them sexually because of that. The same with the natives in Africa and throughout the globe.

There seems to be a feeling that men will loose control if women dress provocatively, but women on the beaches of France have gone topless for quite a while with no problems, and we have nude beaches, with no problems.

The problem is simply one of becoming accustomed to the beauty of the female form aue natural.

Muslim men seem to believe that they will loose control and rape a woman if she provocatively shows an inch of ankle or forearm. Perhaps these women are correct in that the problem is not with the women, but with the men.
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
22 months ago: If God had wanted the Hawaiians to go topless, he wouldn't have made coconut shells. :-))
22 months ago: funny, a parade....

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnew...

...Police gave the two dozen women an escort as they bared their breasts for a stroll through Maine's biggest city.

Hundreds of onlookers, mostly men, turned out to watch the topless demo.

MacDowell said she was upset that many of the men were taking photos on their mobile phones at the spectacle.

She said: "I'm really upset by the men ... watching it like it's a parade." ...

Hey babe... Official Police escort = PARADE.

MacDowell should be more upset that her breasts will be forever cached on the internet.
22 months ago: Is that hair, a hat or what on the girl on the right? Or did she just come from auditioning for "Annie"?
Most breasteses are better left to the imagination.
22 months ago: When it comes to the naked human body we here in the US are quite repressive. We all want freedom but not if it means seeing an unclothed breast or other part of the anatomy that is considered sexual, we will go to untold lengths to get it covered up, even if it's not in our presence. (not me, society in general)

After spending many years out of the country, in societies that aren't as backward as ours when it comes to nudity, I learned that the human body is quite enjoyable to see. It's not ugly (yes there are some ugly ones but in general most are attractive) or filthy or repulsive and if you have a healthy respect for others and you don't have some mental hang-ups with sex, seeing a naked or semi-naked woman (or man), you will not become overly aroused and attack them. You might take a good, long look, but that is only natural in a society that has shunned nudity for so long.

I support their effort to liberate our society of its negative opinion of the human body. But if someone wants to take pictures and that is a problem for them then they should stay home.

Al, so true!

OOTB, ever think that if our society wasn't so hung up on hiding the human body from sight that there would be less strip clubs......

Al, would Muslim women make such statements if they had never had to wear a Hijab and had not been brainwashed from birth that they had to wear one? Who knows what horrors they were told while still children about what would happen to them if they did not hide their entire body from the eyes of men. Memories can go back a lot longer than conscience thought can recall and the effects govern how we behave whether we know it or not.

Now if we could just get the FCC to release its puritanical hold on the media!
22 months ago: Is this march related to the Teat Parties I've been hearing about?

Kymber1209
Kymber1209
Willis, TX
19 months ago: OY VEY!!!!!!

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.