Science & Technology

Rave

The Future Of Education?

Posted 7 months ago|2 comments|356 views
Classroom of the Future?
Written by
Altruist
Eugene, OR
CNN just finished an excellent town hall type summit on education called Education Nation. http://www.educationnation.com/

I watched one of the teachers at the summit talk about one of his students. His principle had told him that he would never have to see her. The girl who has leukemia was not allowed to attend school but was required by the school district to be signed up. The teacher went to see the student and set up Skype so she could attend and participate in classes.

This fourth grade class made a video of their classmate and the video which can be viewed at this site received a million views. http://learningismessy.com/blog/?p=196

Many students think this is the future of education. http://www.tomorrow.org/speakup/pdfs/Stu...

Education costs are the major cost of State budgets and because of the fiscal crisis school districts are required to lay off teachers and reduce class size. We spend more on education than most other countries in the world yet our students do poorly in comparison. How can we bring costs down and at the same time increase the quality of education?

When I taught, I noticed that it took only one or two "Problem Students" or students with discipline problems to disrupt the entire classroom and make it difficult for anyone to learn. I daydreamed about kicking out these problem kids like the private schools did, so we had nothing but kids interested in learning. What if we kicked out the problem kids but allowed them to attend classes and get assignments via Skype so they would learn but not disrupt?

A lot of kids drop out of school because of bullying, harassment, or embarrassment that they can't compete or keep up. Many more students attend class but they are not really there to learn. Many kids don't really wake up till noon, others can't pay attention because they are hungry. Some are bored, some are confused, and many more are only interested in flirting or in socializing with friends. Could they attend school or listen to recorded lectures from home when the time is right for them?

Skype is good but Avatars are better. Research indicates that kids learn better from other kids than they do from teachers. An Avatar would present a non threatening non intimidating presence that a student would respond to with more openness. http://www.squidoo.com/voki

If hooked up to an artificial intelligence or just a good learning program, avatars of both the student and the teacher, could provide an education that wouldn't be nearly as intimidating and kids would learn more, be constantly challenged and be able to work at their own timescale. Wouldn't it be nice if kids learned that education was fun. Wouldn't it be nice if all students were constantly challenged in subjects that they were interested in? http://www.virtualteacher.com.au/classro...


I have a friend going to school to be a nurse. Her first semester she had to pay $600 for textbooks! I think that is insane! Why can't textbooks be on line, so all students can access them on laptops or pads? That would save a lot of money. What about the crowded schools? Wouldn't it make sense to allow many students to work at home, at different times of the day? Bill Gates thinks that within five years the best education will take place on line. http://techcrunch.com/2010/08/06/bill-ga...

EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
7 months ago: A "Teacher" that "daydreamed about kicking out these problem kids"?

Really? Maybe it wasn't the "problem kids" but the problem teacher.

Go figure.

You folks think there might be more of the same mindset in the system with tenure?
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
7 months ago: Anyone that has been in a classroom dreams of having self motivated kids that love learning. Anyone can teach well behaved self motivated kids. The difficult kids takes a great teacher.

Unfortunately the poor school districts with the most problem kids have the least money so they can only hire the newbies just out of school or the not so good teachers that can't get hired in the swanky well funded schools.

That is why no child left behind and even race to the top will not work. They treat education like a business. They reward the "successful" schools where the students do well, with more money and penalize the "unsuccessful" schools where the students do poorly by cutting off funding.

It should be the opposite. The best teachers are needed in the poorest schools where there is a high percentage of "Problem kids". Kids that only have one parent that has to work two jobs, so the kids get little help or support from the parents. Kids that have violent parents, some on drugs, some drunks, some both. Kids with fetal alcohol syndrome. Kids who have drug problems. Kids in gangs.

Any teacher with a lot of kids like this can be driven nuts, especially when the teachers are taught to be firm disciplinarians and taught not to get close to the kids. The kids can sense fear and weakness in the teacher and play upon that. They instinctively rebel against authority. Not much learning going on in a situation like this. It is very stressful for the teacher. That is why the average teacher quits the profession after only 5 years. Being demonized by the right doesn't make the profession more attractive.

Making the future of the teacher and of the entire school dependent on testing, adds more stress and also leads to cheating. Instead the teachers and schools should be judged on how much improvement they can achieve. We shouldn't be teaching to the test, we should be teaching kids how to teach themselves and how to love learning so they will learn throughout life.

That is why we need to spend a lot more, not less, in poorer school districts to attract the very best teachers where there are more challenges.

There are a lot of differences between our system and the countries where the students excel. In all of those countries schools are funded nationally so they all have equal funding. Our system based on local property taxes always have less money where there is more need. The other difference is respect for the teachers and the best teachers are recruited from the best graduates with much greater salaries.

We should learn how the nation rated best in education changed from average to the best. http://www.aft.org/pdfs/americaneducator...

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.