Economy

Rave

The Banks need MORE Regulation!

Posted 12 months ago|3 comments|252 views
Robin Hood Tax the Answer?
Written by
Altruist
Eugene, OR
Now with the Morgan Chase loss of $2 billion many are calling for more regulations on the banks to preserve confidence in the system. JP Morgan was supposed to be the most responsible of the banks. If they are messing up, everyone else will probably be even worse.

These Banksters are gambling with OUR money. These are our pensions they are gambling away.

The big conservative theory is that if you take away all of the government regulations every industry will just do fine. For that reason the Glass Steagal law was done away with and that allowed the banks which had been in the business of lending people money for their homes and small business, to enter into the gambling business.

We saw how well that worked when the banksters just about destroyed the world's economy in 2007. we saw how well the oil industry did when they had little regulation with the BP disaster, and coal with the Massey mine disaster.

The losses at Morgan Chase involved "synthetic credit positions," a type of the complex financial instruments known as derivatives.

"Enhanced oversight of derivatives was a pillar of the 2010 financial overhaul law, known as Dodd-Frank, but the implementation has been delayed repeatedly and will not take effect until the end of this year at the earliest."

"JPMorgan's trades show that the derivatives market remains too opaque for regulators to oversee effectively, said Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., one of the law's namesakes." http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/i...

The reason Dodd Frank was delayed is that the Republicans refused to confirm the head of the agency, and the agency by law couldn't work without a head, so President Obama was forced to make a recess appointment. Then the Republicans have done everything they could to starve the agency of funds. You have the smartest minds in the business making incredibly complex financial instruments and then a $50,000 regulator is supposed to watch what they are doing.

We need to bring back Glass Steagal to get the banks back into the business of lending and also enact financial transaction taxes so the gamblers have a bit of skin in the game. http://www.debatingeurope.eu/2011/09/15/...

The main advantage of a financial transaction tax is that it would curb the harmful speculation that caused the economic collapse. Another reason is that the derivatives and hedge funds create a lot of "Phantom Wealth" that has little intrinsic value. A tax on phantom wealth is vastly superior to taxes on real wealth like labor. A financial Transaction Tax is gaining much more support http://www.cepr.net/documents/ftt-suppor...

EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
12 months ago: Yea!
Maybe you can put Barnie Franks and Chris Dodd in charge of some commission!


(for crying out loud Al. Did you ever urinate on a flat rock at some point?)


Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
12 months ago: Wall Street has bought up most of the politicians on both sides but Wall St. is giving 90% of it's contributions (bribery) to the Republicans nowadays.

Because of this intense lobbying effort the Republicans have been able to block the rules that would have prevented JP Morgan from gambling away thousands of people's pensions. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/11...

As the election draws near it will become increasingly clear that the Republican's obstructionism and their class warfare stealing from the poor to give the already obscenely rich twice as much, are the causes of the economy not recovering. Because of their policies 93% of the recovery has gone to the 1% and the rest of us are still suffering. The GOP (Greedy Old Plutocrats) don't care about jobs or the regular people, they just want more and more and more for themselves.

"The Republican plans we've seen share a few basic premises. First, taxes are too high, and must be cut. Second, defense spending is too low, and should be raised. Third, major changes to entitlement programs should be passed now, but they shouldn't affect the current generation of retirees. That would all be fine, except for the fourth premise, which is that short-term deficits are a serious threat to the country and they need to be swiftly cut."

"The first three budget premises means that taxes and defense will contribute more to the deficit, and Medicare and Social Security aren't available for quick savings. That leaves programs for the poor as the only major programs available to bear cuts. But now cuts to those programs have to pay for the deficit reduction, the increased defense spending, and the tax cuts. That means the cuts to those programs have to be really, really, really deep. The authors have no other choice." http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra...
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
12 months ago: Glass-Steagal was done away with under Bill Clinton, in an exchange for the Community Reinvestment Act. To blame it on the Republicans is either disingenuous, or a lack of historical knowledge.

"The National Homeownership Strategy began in 1994 when Clinton directed HUD Secretary Henry Cisneros to come up with a plan, and Cisneros convened what HUD called a "historic meeting" of private and public housing-industry organizations in August 1994. The group eventually produced a plan that argues for creative measures to promote home ownership.

Here's an excerpt. Read it closely and you can see the seeds of disaster being planted:

For many potential homebuyers, the lack of cash available to accumulate the required downpayment and closing costs is the major impediment to purchasing a home. Other households do not have sufficient available income to to make the monthly payments on mortgages financed at market interest rates for standard loan terms. Financing strategies, fueled by the creativity and resources of the private and public sectors, should address both of these financial barriers to homeownership." http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/h...

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.