Written by
I think we can all agree that you are reading an article on the internet, I think we can all agree that you are reading about Scientology, a religion. I think we can all agree that the hate group Anonymous will soon wither away from boredom and lack of purpose.
Nevertheless, some person or persons claiming to be Louanne Lee (http://www.rantrave.com/profile/louannelee.aspx) or Louanne (http://www.rantrave.com/profile/Louanne.aspx) have started posting on RantRave. Thus far, their posts do not contain a single word that is not part of a complaint, a negativity, a threat or a troll.
The worst thing is that they try to link this suppressive attitude to the practice of Scientology, attempting to hypnotize readers into negativity.
They drag the weak-minded and easily led into their negative and petty way of thinking, encouraging them to actually end up wrong-targeting volunteer philanthropy, attacking the words of L Ron Hubbard, attacking the exposers of psychiatric abuse, attacking the excitement, the possibilities, and the freedom of Scientology, repressing and suppressing, attacking the fun of Scientology with nasty little pettiness, playing into Anonymous's hands, and preserving Anonymous.
No wonder you don't find many Scientologists on the internet with these straight-jacketed little prison wardens stalking around.
Back to the good news.
The good news is that Anonymous has already failed in its quest to belittle Scientology because, inevitably, the technology of Scientology will ensure the disappearance of Anonymous.
Since the source of Anonymous has been identified as Big Pharma, Anonymous cannot persist. This follows from what L Ron Hubbard said in the Phoenix Lectures.
“In order to get an As-is-ness to persist it is absolutely necessary that is moment of creation be masked. Its moment, space, mass and energy, if duplicated would cause that to cease to exist. The recognition of As-is-ness will bring about a none-ness – a dissapearance. In other words a return to the basic postulate. You'd have to make the postulate all over again, and then, to get it to exist any further, why you would then have to go forward and change it in such a way that people would not actually be able to recognize its source at all. You have to thoroughly obscure the source to get a persistence. Be sure that you see that. You'd have to say it came from somewhere and someone other than the actual source. People have done this with such things as Dianetics.”
LRH further stated -
“Well, we know already that if we've run it permissively in the environment, he's had to point them out and walk around to them. He will obey orders. Now that we've got him to a point where he will physically obey commands we can trust him to close his eyes and spot spots or spot spaces or spot anything he wants to spot with his eyes closed. We just simply keep on spotting them, and that would be the most elementary process there is in Scientology.”
"If we were to carry a little black bag an a stethoscope (that's the Badge of Office – a little black bag and a stethoscope. One doesn't quite know what they do with the stethoscope but it's interesting. It won't even detect whether a person is dead or not. A stethoscope is actually a reactive dramatization of the Serpent of Caduceus) and we walk up to somebody and say, “My dear fellow I must inform you,” having tapped the stethoscope against his chest so he knows he's being hit by a snake, “I must inform you that we have just learned through this diagnosis that you only have three months to live.”
“If you ask a preclear for “some things you wouldn't mind agreeing with,” or “something that you could do that other people would agree with”, and so on, you'll notice a change in the case. Why? We're improving his level of agreement [ . . .] The worse off a group is, which is to say the less communication they have, actually the more communication can be forced on them, and you see a form of hypnotism there, but the interesting thing is that they must have been prepared by an enormous number of agreements before they got into that state. In other words, somebody else prepared them, so they didn't care who they agreed with after a while. When someone of higher rank in a uniform walks up to a soldier and says do something, the soldier will do it. Well, this is a form of hypnotism. You could get a group to agree first that you were simply standing there, and then the next thing that you could get them to agree to is the fact that they were listening to you, and then you would give them a few little things on which they would agree, and at some point you could tell them that the world was on fire and the audience would rush out to find out, or maybe they'd just sit there and burn..
Now what is this all about? Does that mean that anybody bringing about an agreement would bring about hypnotism? Oh, no.
The reason why, in Scientology, we do not bring about a hypnotism even in Open Procedure by Duplication, is that we are undoing the agreements which people have been making for seventy-six trillion years. We're undoing these, thus auditing makes a person freer, and freer, and freer.”
So, I think we can all agree that Anonymous probably won't persist for another three months. Meanwhile, the Orgs are booming at unprecedentedly exponential levels of expansion.