News & Politics

Rave

Lion At Rest

Posted 33 months ago|11 comments|586 views
VIDEOS
Written by
JAK Gladney
Saint Albans, WV
John F. Kennedy was reportedly fond of the verse, in the Gospel of Luke, “For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required.” For generations of Kennedy men, this remained the guiding family ethos—a call to public service and larger sense of noblesse oblige, a sentiment now wanting in many first families.

I’ve always argued that progressives are at their best when fighting for a lost cause—something about success ruins us, makes us lose our way. And over the decades, we have known many lost causes. Some loom larger than others, and maybe—for my political education—none larger than the 1980 Democratic primary. Faced with a vulnerable incumbent, Edward Kennedy decided to take up the challenge left him by his martyred brothers, and maybe to redeem a youth marred by waste, dissolution and a playboy’s lifestyle. And he ultimately lost, like so many accomplished presidential also-rans before him, his last realistic chance at the presidency.

Teddy Kennedy’s concession speech at the 1980 Democratic National Convention is one of those rare events that still has the power to inspire and to motivate—to cut through most of my adult disillusionment and cynicism and appeal to something better. It is the essence of liberal Democratic belief: working-class boilerplate, stubbornly optimistic, when everything in the contemporary culture argued against optimism.

Joe Kennedy’s youngest son was again at his best in January of 2007, arguing to bring legislation raising the minimum wage, long-delayed, to a floor vote (see video).

Much has been made of Teddy’s strong endorsement of the current president, going so far as to call Barack Obama the “last brother” in the long Kennedy tradition. The Kennedy’s have long been known for party crashing—not content to wait in line for open congressional seats, flouting clubbish attitudes that barred Irish-American Catholics from the inner circles, never timid about the appearance of nepotism. In the toughest fights, who better at your side than your family?

Obama faces challenges and, if the current mood is to be gauged, dangers that were familiar to the Kennedy clan. Time will tell if he is equal to them. But today, as progressives everywhere mourn Ted Kennedy’s death, he shoulders a staggering legacy.
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
33 months ago: JAK:

I actually understood the Kennedys had a lust for power and an inferiority complex.

Wasn't the elder Kennedy a drug dealer and moonshiner? (Seriously.)

Obama "shoulders a staggering legacy"? Huh? Is it now Prince Obama?
markbyrn
markbyrn
 Moderator
33 months ago: Here's an old advertisement that shows what might of been for Ted the Lion.

http://tinyurl.com/nwvwz3
JAK Gladney
JAK Gladney
Saint Albans, WV
33 months ago: Wow. Kind of like walking over a dead man's grave. Way to stay classy guys.
markbyrn
markbyrn
 Moderator
33 months ago: ...Kind of like walking over a dead man's grave...

Yep: "Ted Kennedy: bitter memories linger at Chappaquiddick"

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/6095890/Ted-Kennedy-bitter-memories-linger-at-Chappaquiddick.html
JAK Gladney
JAK Gladney
Saint Albans, WV
33 months ago: That was great, Mark. Are you available for eulogies?
markbyrn
markbyrn
 Moderator
33 months ago: Sorry JAK, Hard to think of the man as a lion he ran like a coward as a woman lay dead or dying due to his gross negligence. Since I'm not a hardcase political ideologue, I'm not going to overlook the fact that he got away with murder, "staggering legacy" or not.
JAK Gladney
JAK Gladney
Saint Albans, WV
33 months ago: Here's the thing, Mark. I think it does establish you as "extremist" in your views.

Such is the partisanship at work these days: liberals will exploit his death to further the health care agenda; conservatives will point to it as another example of the star struck liberal media (though I haven't heard anyone whitewash Chappaquiddick--how could anyone?); and everyone else will take the same delight they always take in thumbing their noses at the pieties of those silly, sentimental "hard cases"--political, religious, etc.

You've used the "I'm not a hardcase political ideologue" line elsewhere--you're obviously proud of it. I frankly don't know what to do with a non-hardcase like yourself. You have to bring more to the debate than a gadfly's ironic, smug detachment, or to be so protective of that reputation that you stake your position farther and farther from the mainstream camp. I'm suggesting that Kennedy's legacy is more complex than pampered, murdering drunk--not really a controversial position, unless you feel a need to constantly establish contrarian street cred. You can have it.
markbyrn
markbyrn
 Moderator
33 months ago: ..pampered, murdering drunk..

I agree
JAK Gladney
JAK Gladney
Saint Albans, WV
33 months ago: Snark, Snark. Adorable.
33 months ago: His name and family kept him in office. If it had been one of my family they would have spent the rest of their life in jail for involuntary manslaughter. Money bought him his freedom...I did not agree with his politics but my prayers do go out to his family at this time.
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
33 months ago: Chappaquiddick was probably a cowardly thing to do but I don't feel that I (or anyone else) should judge because people do strange things when panic sets in and you go into shock. The self preservation thing is quite strong in all of us.
From looking at the retrospective clips of the 80 election it appears that Ted lost that because he didn't really have a good reason to run. He wasn't driven. He didn't see innumerable problems that he thought he was uniquely qualified to solve. He ran because it was expected of him and he didn't have the fire in the belly it takes to win.
Once he decided that he would be better in the Senate he really did apply himself and both parties have said that he was extremely good and effective at what he did. He was one of the few remaining people who could craft bipartisan bills, and having negotiated compromises, bring along the rest of his party.
Without him and lacking anyone of his talents, I fear that the Senate will get even less done than it had before.He was a man that truly cared for the American people and served the politically weak and disenfranchised. Who will speak for them now?

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.