News & Politics

Rave

Help For Homeowners?

Posted 3 months ago|19 comments|281 views
Occupy Wall Street Prevents Foreclosures
Written by
Altruist
Eugene, OR
The Occupy movement has been active all over the country, trying to prevent foreclosures. It turns out that in many cases, the banks have no idea who has the mortgage papers for the home, and if the homeowner simply asks to see those papers, that the bank will be unable to produce them, and the homeowner will be able to stay.

The best way to prevent foreclosures is to get the banks to refinance the loan. Housing drives the economy. This is the largest expenditure of the average family (35%) so if you can reduce the amount people have to spend on their homes, it boosts the economy.

President Obama just proposed a plan that would allow 3.5 million homeowners to save up to $3000 a year on what they pay on their mortgage by allowing them to refinance at record low interest rates. http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/e...

Most of the experts think the plan would help millions of homeowners and would also help the economy, with the caveat that they doubt the Republicans would pass the bill.
Part of the plan would allow for the purchase of foreclosed homes. These homes instead of remaining vacant and lowering surrounding home values, would then be turned into rental housing. I personally think the bill doesn't go far enough, because it wouldn't allow the homeowners that are loosing their homes, but who couldn't qualify for refinancing, to remain in their same home as renters. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra...

Oregon and several other states have reached an agreement with the five major mortgage servicers, to help homeowners whose mortgages are "Under Water" ( the mortgage is more than the home value). In this agreement between $100 million to $200 million would be available in Oregon to refinance homes. The New York Times estimates that about a million homeowners would have their mortgage burdens lowered by about $20,000. It would also provide another 750,000 families to receive $1800 apiece because they were the victims of improper foreclosure procedures. http://www.registerguard.com/web/busines...

Another good idea is Senate Bill 628 which requires banks to enter into mediation with homeowners to see if the mortgage can be refinanced, before the home is foreclosed on. Please write to your lawmaker asking for support of this bill, because it only has 30 days for consideration. http://www.needhelppayingbills.com/html/...

Most of these bills are opposed by Republicans. Why? Wouldn't most representatives want to help homeowners (at no cost to the public) and get the economy going again?

One reason Republicans oppose helping the homeowners is that all but 13 Republicans in Congress have signed a pledge never to raise taxes for any reason, and they consider the small fee on banks to pay for the housing bill, to be a tax.

The main reason however is a deep philosophical belief that government should be minimized and should not act to help people. They think the housing markets should be allowed to hit bottom and allow the free market to sort everything out. http://www.democrats.org/news/december-1...

Another reason is simply that the Republicans favor the rich more than the poor. The rich are able to snap up foreclosed homes at bargain basement prices, and then flip them for a quick profit. Right now banks are making it more difficult for regular people to buy homes. The rich can afford to pay cash. 32% of foreclosed homes were purchased with cash last year. http://money.cnn.com/2011/03/10/real_est...

This is just my opinion but I suspect that the main reason the Republicans don't want to do what is best for the people, and the country, is that they want the economy to falter which would harm President Obama's reelection chances.


EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
3 months ago: Al. Isn't it one of the "Occupy" tenets to scream about bail-outs? Would that only apply to everyone but them? Nothing like being a tad bit the hypocrite.
3 months ago: er...uh... Al.

Who in the wide, wide world of sports would pay for obama's plan?

Huh?

The tooth fairy?

IT AIN'T YOUR MONEY AL!
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
3 months ago: The four banks that were bailed out by Bush in his Tarp Program were never required to use that money to bail out the homeowners. They should have been nationalized so they could be forced to do their jobs.

Instead they continued to use our money to gamble on financial speculation. These banks now have $236 trillion of derivatives on their books, even though the entire GDP of the world is only $60 trillion.

They just create this "Phantom Wealth" out of nothing.

They can surely afford a tiny amount of that to help out homeowners,since they created the housing bubble that hurt those homeowners and destroyed the entire economy.
3 months ago: Sort of like Chavez, huh?

Are you finally starting to admit you are a communist then?

A socialist let's the shareholders keep the bank, but the socialist tells the bank how to run its business.

A communist nationalizes the banks ie. takes it over.

You sir are dangerous and helping destroy our society.

Shame on you.
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
3 months ago: Bush should have forced the banks to restructure loans. When they were failing it would have been simplest to force the banks to restructure so the public's money went to helping homeowners and small businesses instead of gambling and giving huge million dollar bonuses to CEO's.

That worked pretty well with GM which is now # 1 again.

I have yet to hear any other plans from the Republicans on how to help the 1/4th of all homeowners that are underwater. They only care for the rich so the rest can become destitute.

To just throw away one fourth of the people in the country is downright unpatriotic.

Shame on all of the Republicans, especially the nutty Tea Partiers.
3 months ago: I was wondering when you would start on "Bush should have"...

How about Frank-Dodd? Uh? Uh? Uh? Duh?

3 months ago: Sorry... forgot... O'Barney-O'Chris Law signed by O'Berry O'Indonesia da Muzzlammie World Belt "O'Holder".
3 months ago: GM is # 1 Al? Where? China? Do your research before you dare to look like another damn fool from freaking OR/CA/WA/Pacifica radio.
3 months ago: Al.

I have personal knowledge that you have no clue what you are talking about.

I am a Tea Partier, and I am struggling mightily to make ends meet. I am working overtime just to keep my snorkle 1/2 inch above water.

I ain't rich.

But, I still cherish my freedom.

And Obama and you and your ilk are destroying this last bastion of freedom throughout all of human civilization.

You are blinded by your twisted envy of those who work HARD to make their lives better, and end up succeeding where you could not.

It must be a miserable existence.
3 months ago: Red, that would make you a responsible person. They want to lower everyone to their level instead of raising themselves to a higher level. That would take too much hard work. They want everyone to wear the same grey suits, sit in the same sized cubicles and eat the same tofu.
3 months ago: The best help a homeowner could use is the one that is seldom spoken of. Keep paying your mortgage even if it is just a fraction of it. Many home owners feel that since they can't afford their full payment that they might as well not pay it at all. This is stupid. First of all any lender receiving money from a borrower will not turn it down and as such they cannot take away your home for nonpayment. Many times it is as simple as keeping up the interest portion of the payment. Many home owners let their payments lapse for over a year and by then they are so far behind that it seems insurmountable but even then all hope is not lost.

Bank lenders reposes a home but often leave the property abandoned to looters and squatters City Marshals don't usually come to kick out homeowners they do that to renters and as such the home owner can most likely squat in his former residence undisturbed by the authorities or the bank until they decide to actually do something about the house they took from you. Hopefully by then the former home owner will have figured something out!
3 months ago: Yep, long gone are the days when...

a handshake was a contract,
a persons word was his bond,
and God forbid,

your good name was worth more than your possessions.
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
3 months ago: Red it astounds me that you complain about not making much money yet the Republican platform with it's flat taxes, and shredding the safety net and eliminating health care would only benefit the rich and would shift the tax burden further onto the poor like you. Why are you shooting yourself in the foot? Why don't you guys work for policies that help all Americans not just the rich?

I thought it interesting that when Bush bailed out Wall Street and the banks he just threw money at them with no strings attached. They didn't have to limit their bonuses, or help the homeowners, or stop gambling on securities, but when he bailed out the car companies he had all kinds of requirements. They had to ban all strikes, cut pensions, and cut wages. So now GM is back on top but instead of making $40 an hour people are making $17 an hour.

Despite all of the screaming from the right about too much regulation the banks are still screwing homeowners and are still doing the same exact things that destroyed the economy in the first place. http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/02...
3 months ago: Al, policies that help the rich result in increased donations to political parties and cushy jobs after public service for those who can "make things happen". You know that. And as for shifting tax burdens..... that's what they do. A flat tax on every person and institution in the US or doing business in the US or from the US would go a long way to funding each and every program the government puts into place, past, present or future. Not going to happen though because too much rides on not paying taxes, latterly trillions of dollars that the rich can tap for bonuses and inflated salaries, golden parachutes and other wealth that us poor folk will never ever be allowed to access.

I thought it pretty back-handed that Bush gave away billion of tax dollars and required not one cent be used to actually help people in need, at least not people who needed help. If you were rich, you got all the help you needed to get richer. The process is still going on, Obama didn't change it.

GM may be back on top but those manual labor jobs that paid $40 an hour are now paying more what they were worth, it's just that GM is still charging the $40 an hour rate for their vehicles. Why pay real market prices for labor when you can get it for slave labor rates? The rest of the country does not nor ever did make $40 an hour to pay the cost of a vehicle, now they still don't so not much has changed except GM is pocketing cash that should be going to the taxpayers to repay the loan at it's true value.

The banks and other financial institutions are screwing any and every one who uses their services. Practically zero interest is being paid for savings while loans are being given out at very high interest except maybe home loans and they are low because no one can afford the high interest on such large amounts. I would love to have a couple hundred thousand to put in one account I started back in the 90's, pays 4% per year. Find that rate anywhere else for pure cash in, interest out. Most pay less than 1%, highest is 4.11% according to quick search. I'm not talking a CD either. I'll not talk about credit card fees or bank fees as they are too depressing.

Just looking at what banks and lenders do to acquire property shows that they are only interested in turning a profit and they don't care who gets thrown out on the street to do it. If they can trick you into paying for a mortgage for a few years and then throw you out by causing a local company to fail and lay off workers so they don't have an income, they will. They have no ties to the local community other than the ones they want that they can use to increase investment by other rich people at the expense of the little guy who barely makes his payments each month.

As for the governments help for homeowners, I don't think they go far enough. 3.5 million might be a big number but how many really need help? 10 million, 20 million? And what about all those who already lost their houses and all the money they put into them? $1800 isn't even enough to get into a rental in most markets for family housing.
3 months ago: Albert. Where did Red ever say he didn't MAKE MUCH MONEY? Your misread is your problem. I'll make it simple so even a second grader can understand. You ready Al?

Why should Red which EARNS 12 cookies a day have to give 8 of his EARNED cookies away to feed you?
3 months ago: Al, Respectfully, you are full of $4**.

We didn't have healthcare before Obamacare?!?! People were dying on the streets, huh because they couldn't see a doctor, Huh?

Give me a break.

Shift the tax burden on the poor? Do what!?! With the Fair Tax, you lazy, no producing, smelly, couch potatoe, Obamabitemees will get a check back each month....so you lazy, no producing, smelly couch potatoes, Obamabitemees WON'T PAY ANY TAXES AT ALL.

"GM is back on top again" like COW FLATULENCE AND MY EXHALATION ARE TURNING PIGEON FORGE INTO MYRTYLE BEACH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You are correct about me screaming though.
3 months ago: Sorry Red. I thought my second grade COOKIE explanation would be more understandable to the equal TOFU for all crowd.
3 months ago: So Red earns 12 cookies per day and your equal TOFU for all government took 8 of Reds' cookies. Now Red (which will probably die at WORK) has 4 cookies while your TOFU government sends the 8 cookies they stole from him to feed two families (4 cookies each). Yeah, that really wants all of us to grow up and get a JOB, work hard and pay our taxes to a TOFU commune.
3 months ago: Speaking of healthcare, health insurance and health care in general was a big money sucking black hole of a scam long before Obama decided to implement the REPUBLICAN conceived program that came to be known as Obamacare. If y'all recall it was proposed as a rebuttal to Hillarycare which wanted to shift the cost square onto the lap of corporations and employers, an obvious no go for Republicans back then.

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.