Science & Technology

Rave

Google Chrome Pwn3s Hackers

Posted 35 months ago|15 comments|884 views
Written by
Alex Layton
 Administrator
Puyallup, WA
This week, a hacker competition, called Pwn2Own, took place. The competition challenges hackers and security experts to identify and exploit vulnerabilities in web browsers. The browsers to be hacked included Microsoft’s Internet Explorer 8, Mozilla’s Firefox and Google’s Chrome, for PC and Firefox and Safari for Apple.

Once the hackers find the problems, they are awarded the computer they were able to corrupt and the competition purchases the winning vulnerabilities from them, which they then hand over to the affected vendors.

This year, the only browser to escape un-hacked was Google Chrome. Although a security hole was found, the additional security features prevented it from being exploited.

So, congratulations to Google Chrome, for creating a sweet, safe browser.

Also, while I have you, I’d like to turn this into a “Google Chrome” Rave. I have used Google Chrome on and off for a few months. Two of my favorite features are Crash Control and the New Tab Page. Crash Control allows a single tab to be non-responsive, rather than freezing the whole browser. You can then close that single tab, instead of restarting the whole program. The other feature, the New Tab page, makes browsing much quicker. When you click on “new tab,” it shows 6 boxes, each with your most-visited web pages. This allows you to either click on one of the pages you usually visit, or go to a different page, as you would any other browser. It’s a small feature, but I think it’s very clever.

I highly recommend trying it out. Give it a week and see what you think.
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
Coloranter Raver
Coloranter Raver
Denver, CO
35 months ago: "Google Chrome for Mac is in development and a team of engineers is working hard to bring it to you as soon as possible." http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/mac.html

Once again Mac users are slighted!
TheLegendTomWing
TheLegendTomWing
 Administrator
Philadelphia, PA
35 months ago: DAMN!
I'm one of those slighted Mac users,

ehh, it's okay, Google is taking over the world anyway.
Coloranter Raver
Coloranter Raver
Denver, CO
35 months ago: Google has one major deficiency that is the same one possessed by Microsoft that will always keep Apple ahead of the game vs. both despite Microsoft having been the most used operating system in the world, and that is they make both the software and the hardware. Likewise, Google is a software company only. So, don't lose heart, Wingster. You can also sign up using the link I gave for Mac Chrome alerts.
seattlescotsman
seattlescotsman
Seattle, WA
35 months ago: To respond to Coloranter Raver:

How does Apple making both hardware and software put them "ahead" of the game? With the exception of the software that comes bundled with the operating system, they seem to be at a disadvantage--new applications, games and add-on hardware that are readily available on PC often take months longer to arrive on Macs, if at all.

The genius of Microsoft (and the reason why the world uses computers with Microsoft operating systems) is because they took a non-proprietary approach to their software. It can be used with hardware built by anyone. Also, from the very beginning, they made it easy for programmers to develop and license applications for Windows.

Mac is obviously trying to improve itself by working to improve some of the mistakes they've made in the past--such as now making it easier to develop and license programs for the Mac OS, and working hard to make the Mac compatible with more peripherals and add-on hardware. But I still these things would be considered "catching up" to the PC, not "having an advantage."

And in terms of manufacturing, what does Apple really make these days, computer-wise? Intel makes all the processors. NVidia supplies all the graphics processing units. Samsung and a few other brands manufacture the RAM. I suppose Apple still manufactures the chipsets and cases, but the most important parts of their computers are all built by other companies now.
Coloranter Raver
Coloranter Raver
Denver, CO
35 months ago: Why Seattle Scotsman, I'm so glad you asked, and I hope you are just a little bit biased due to your location being so close to the HQ of MS.

Apple is ahead of the game because they are able to innovate in both realms of hardware and software. They can create iTunes and the iPod successfully. Zune? The only hardward success story Microsoft has is the Xbox. But, it doesn't use MS software in the same way as say the iPhone uses the Mac OS. If you look back over the history of MS, you will find countless examples of copying innovation right down to copying the Mac interface which was allowed by a judge who claimed the Mac interface was so simple any child could have thought of it so it couldn't be owned. Ironic since Bill Gates, supposedly one of the world's greatest tech innovators DIDN'T think of it. MS and Bill Gates have always been good at copying other people's stuff and not so great at coming up with it on their own. You look at Vista. The features? Largely copied from MacOS with rare exceptions. And you look at why Vista has been doing more for the success of Apple's market share than anything Apple could have done, it's because of the inability for the company to get it's stuff to play nice with the hardware they don't control. Meanwhile, imagine how much more difficult it is for MS software engineers to try to make software that works with so many different computers? Whereas, Apple only has to make theirs work with on type. And Apples are so great, they can run native Vista better than any PC computer out there. The very fact that Intel-based Macs can run Vista and therefore any program made for Vista says all I need to say, doesn't it? If you have a Mac you can have it all. The best of both worlds. But, I've never known a single person in my life who used a Mac for a year that ever wanted to go back to a Windows PC machine.
Coloranter Raver
Coloranter Raver
Denver, CO
35 months ago: Next, let's talk a little bit about the "non-proprietary" angle you mention. That's kind of a joke right? They have the most proprietary OS on the planet. The only genius of Bill Gates here is that he managed to convince HP, IBM, Gateway, Toshiba, and so on that they could use his OS but only if they signed 10 or 20 year agreements. I once was privileged enough to meet with the right hand man of the founder of Gateway who told me they would do anything they could to get out of their MS OS contract, but they had an iron-clad deal to us MS OS. Unfortunately, what these contracts did was cause MS to grow lazy. Why innovate an OS when you have no competition. And, other than Mac OS until Linux came about, they really had no competition. But, you are sadly mistaken if you think this lead isn't over. Apple's market share continues to rise eclipsing, at last, some of the PC makers. Likewise, sick on annual renewal fees to continue to use MS OS, many of the tried and true users of MS OS are on the move to Linux. The nation of China has recently said it intends to switch to Linux for all of its government PCs as has Amsterdam.

That's one of the dirty little MS secrets that the people who tout MS OS never mention in the sales pitch. Unlike Apple, for example, MS charges business AND schools annual licensing fees to continue to use the MS OS. I once showed the head of my school that if we switched to Mac OS and got rid of our Windows lap tops (ever kid, teacher, and administrator had a PC Laptop) even though the Mac Lap tops were about $100 more, we'd be able to pay one teacher's salary using the money saved from not having to pay the MS renewal. The Director of Tech was mad and said that Apple charged the same fee, but I proved him wrong. He was fired, and we hired another teacher on that savings!
Coloranter Raver
Coloranter Raver
Denver, CO
35 months ago: The days of MS supremacy are numbered and MS knows it. That's why they tried to buy Yahoo. Their search engine was a failure. Their iPod killer was a failure. They are now in the process of copying the iPhone. Well, what can we expect there? Not too much I think. Hopefully it will, at least, be cooler than the Google Phone.

It has never in the history of Apple been difficult to write software for Apple's computers. It's never been easier than now. But regardless, the fewer program issue was always due to software companies choosing to make software for the more prominent Operating System out there. Which is understandable to a degree, even though all research ever done has shown that Apple users are more loyal than any other. Once you have them hooked you have them. But also on this point, Apple has always had a different philosophy which I actually used as a part of my master's degree project. A computer should be a tool for creation, not a game system. You'll notice they've never gotten into the game market really. You think if they came out with their version of the PlayStation it wouldn't rock? That's why they invented GarageBand and Filemaker Pro, and back in the day, HyperCard. As it applied to my project, I researched how kids learn, and I proved that kids learn a lot more when they design software than when they use software. So, for example, if a kid develops a program that teaches others about the parts of the body and what they do, they learn a lot more than if they use a program designed by somebody else. Therefore, schools would be better off buying creative software that allows kids to create than standard educational software.
Coloranter Raver
Coloranter Raver
Denver, CO
35 months ago: Siempre, that is very funny!

As for my continuing my comment to Seattle Scot, "What does Apple make anymore?" I found this comment funny. What does MS make? But anyway, Apple is most prominent in their design and manufacturing processes. Take the latest achievement in the all aluminum computer that is 100% recyclable. Take their new 8-hour battery. Take their ergonomic designs. Since the company began, it's led the world in computer designs that are better for people and better for the world. They spend more money on design than any other computer company, and it shows. No sooner do they design a new way to make a computer than suddenly everyone else is making their computer that way.
Coloranter Raver
Coloranter Raver
Denver, CO
35 months ago: Now for the bad news about Apple. It is my concerted opinion as the owner of a Newton, that Apple does plan obsolescence into its strategy. I believe they have the technology to make full text-screen, gesture-based, super-cool tablet computers right now. But, instead, they release stuff in tiny steps constantly forcing you to go out and buy the new one. Yes, they don't charge annual licensing fees for their Operating system, but they do develop a super new, much cooler, OS almost every year – I'm two behind right now and my computer still works just fine and my PowerBook G4 17" is now 5 years old. So, I haven't been suckered into this buying frenzy ever since I spent my summer earnings on a Newton which became unsupported however many years ago that was.
seattlescotsman
seattlescotsman
Seattle, WA
35 months ago: I won't make any excuses for the Zune -- Microsoft isn't a hardware company, and the Zune went to prove that. And I never stated Bill Gates had anything to do with Windows besides recognizing a marketable product and knowing how to sell it.

The Mac's ability to run Windows doesn't really prove anything except that things have come full circle to where Apple is now copying Microsoft in the way their computers are built and run. And I've seen plenty of tests that show how Bootcamp can make a Mac run Vista "almost as well as a PC," but never have I heard that Macs can run "native Vista better than any PC computer out there" as you stated.

On the other hand, Vista, though having some early bugs, wouldn't have such a bad reputation if it wasn't for Apple's "Mac guy vs PC guy" smear campaign. More than anything else, Apple's market share is due to having a good marketing division.

What's funny is I'm not a huge fan of Microsoft. I think their products are overpriced, and that they take advantage of the fact that nobody wants to go through the hassle of switching to something else. I'm not even originally from Seattle (I grew up in Colorado Springs), so this has nothing to do with my location. I just felt that claiming Google and Microsoft are at a disadvantage to Apple is pretty ridiculous, considering they only control a very tiny piece of the global market.
TheLegendTomWing
TheLegendTomWing
 Administrator
Philadelphia, PA
35 months ago: Actually, i agree with the scotsman, I have a friend who has vista on his mac, and it runs better then my sister's brand spanking new fully loaded HP. So, maybe research hasn't caught up yet, but Macs are definitely built better.

I love mine! Oh, Coloranter, Leopard rocks, you should upgrade!
seattlescotsman
seattlescotsman
Seattle, WA
35 months ago: Coloranter said:
"You'll notice they've never gotten into the game market really. You think if they came out with their version of the PlayStation it wouldn't rock?"

Ha! Actually, Nintendo did try to break into the console market. Their product was such a miserable failure, barely anyone would even recognize the name: The Apple Bandai Pippin.

It came out in the mid-90s to compete with the N64 and PlayStation. It was so bad, that, according to Wikipedia, PC World Magazine named it on its list of the "25 Worst Tech Products of All Time" (source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandai_Pippin).
Perfect Horizon
Perfect Horizon
Chicago, IL
35 months ago: I have tried Chrome twice and quite literally hated it. Its big and clumsy. Also I really do not like the lack of expandability through add-ons and extensions that Firefox offers. The biggest problem, and I am not sure who in their right mind would have told the Google team that it was a good idea to have each tab start as a separate process, but it does and through my testing I was extremely disappointed. I tested by opening Firefox and opening 4 tabs of web pages I visit often and checked the memory usage and then closed it and did the same 4 pages in Chrome and due to the horrid programing of having 5 processes running instead of 1 Chrome was using roughly 3 times more memory than Firefox (and my FF is heavily loaded with add-ons and extensions). I did this test several times and found that Chrome is always much much more memory hungry than firefox, not to mention that browsing speeds were much slower on Chrome for me. Chrome may have something good in the future but where it is at now is just a sad excuse for what should have been a really great browser.
Coloranter Raver
Coloranter Raver
Denver, CO
35 months ago: So, the Wingster, you agree with me because I was the one that stated the a new mac can run Vista faster than a PC. And I know it's true because I've seen it demonstrated at a Second-hand computer store between two buddies of mine, one who's a die-hard PC and one who's a die-hard Apple Mac guy, they even look sort of like the dudes in the commercials. Anyway, they had a bet and the PC lost. The Mac booted and ran Vista faster in loading just about anything they tried. It was kind of funny considering the feud between these two companies. Actually, the truth be told though, it's a healthy rivalry that, of late, Apple has been winning hands down.

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.