Culture & Lifestyle

Rave

Did Scientists Find A “Missing Link?”

Posted 15 months ago|3 comments|2,573 views
VIDEOS
Written by
Chris D
Seattle, WA
Is it a little lemur fossil, a pre-human missing link, both, or neither? German scientists have found a purported 47-million-year-old lemur-like fossil that’s surprisingly human – and very controversial.

The discovery of a new fossil that may be a missing link is shocking, say scientists. The fossil – known as “Darwinius masillae” has primate characteristics – opposable thumbs, “grasping” hands, fingernails instead of claws, and a short limb-to-height ratio.

All these unique qualities suggest that the Dawinius masillae fossil – or “Ida,” as the scientists named her – is a missing link. Ida’s fossil might be the key to understanding early primate evolution. The fossil is very well preserved, and scientists were even able to find evidence of Ida’s fur and her last meal: fruit and leaves.

Furthermore, the lemur-like fossil is from a time period that is underrepresented in evolutionary history. Basically, Ida is one of the only well-preserved lemur/prehuman specimens from the Eocene era – the time period when early primates underwent the most rapid period of evolution.

You can see a picture of Ida to the left. The “Missing Link” YouTube video explains more about Ida’s background and shows more pictures and even x-rays of her skeleton.

It’s obvious that Ida is an important new fossil discovery. But is she really a “missing link?” Do you believe these “Missing Link Found” videos? Is Ida’s skeleton more similar to the lemurs of Madagascar or to the advanced primates, like humans?


(H/T to National Geographic News)


----
Follow me on Twitter!
http://twitter.com/chrisdurr
EMAIL| SHARE|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
The Cypress Gang
The Cypress Gang
Cypress, TX
15 months ago: They must have as google has integrated it into todays logo.
jennygirl24
jennygirl24
Australia
15 months ago: While it may be true that Ida is the 'missing link', I believe that we should wait till she's been studied by a variety of other scientists before we jump to conclusions. From what I've read on timesonline the fossil was studied in secret by ONE team of scientists and the fossil and its findings are only now being made avaliable to the scientific community.
I'm open minded, but it all sounds a little too good to be true.
13 months ago: Science or Fantasy?

Well, I'm not sure that adding more, 'scientific study' of Ida, will make much if any difference. Scientists only find what they are looking for, regardless of fact and more in favor of speculative fantasy. The proof of this is in the description, of the personalities and behavioral characteristics, of species that lived millions of years before man; like the dinosaurs and all other species of that era. Fact is that the only factual thing we can gleam from the fossils is the size, perhaps their weight, and a fairly good idea of what many of them may have looked like. Beyond this all else is nothing more than speculation based on fantasy.

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.