Culture & Lifestyle

Rave

Darwin’s Plantation – Die Ni^^er Die!

Posted 12 months ago|328 comments|2,896 views
Shhhsh! Don't Say It So loud!
VIDEOS
ADDITIONAL IMAGES
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
Written by
November 24th, 1859 is a day that will live in infamy.

On that day a work of so-called scientific literature hit the stands. It was a treatise that is still considered the foundation of evolutionary biology to too many even today. This monument to the "advancement" of science and civilization was titled: "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life" by Charles Darwin.

In a day and age when we are speaking of tolerance and equality, this book is still the foundation of scientific anthropology and carries the same weight as any supposed sacred text on the planet.

Another book which came not that long after was titled "The Descent of Man." Again, written by that deity of modern science, a man whose theories and postulations are beyond reproach or criticism, Mr. Charles Darwin.

A quote:

"At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace throughout the world the savage races. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break will then be rendered wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state as we may hope, than the Caucasian and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as at present between the Negro or Australian and the gorilla."

What's sad is that there are still folks out there who actually have swallowed this bunk. Swallowed it. Swallowed hook, line, sinker, the fisherman, his boots, and the boat.

I believe this is a very appropriate post for Black History Month.

Black History Month itself is a simple designation and a celebration during the month of February which some today will still call unnecessary or not important. Not important even in light of the crap some still have to endure based on the "scientific" postulations of a man who was racist to the core.

And we wonder why we can't all get along. No mystery.

Thanks for reading,

HN

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9KJOtQcl...
Public Enemy – I Don't Want to Called Yo Ni**a

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQX3k4DiA...
Cameo – Skin I'm In

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q70O_p9dk...
Living Colour – Funny Vibe
UPDATE - 12 months ago
Darwin was not the father of racism. I never said he was.

However, the man was a racist supremacist and believed certain races were inferior and others superior. Quite a few folks picked up on it and millions are now dead because of it.

Those are the ugly facts and that is the point I am making regardless of all the bunny trails and tangents that have now attached themselves to this post.

Millions are dead based upon the postulations of a racist who taught as science the inferiority of certain folks. Plain and simple.
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
Truthbrary
Truthbrary
Canada
12 months ago: Sounds like the LDS history too...
12 months ago: TB - Do you think this one will make Google News?
Truthbrary
Truthbrary
Canada
12 months ago: Huey,

I think you may well have connected too many disgusting dots...
...but made a huge point... against the educational history as well...

I have had to re-write a couple for a few reasons and the administrator had some good points. Find a few quotes (cut and paste with reffs. but keep them short) that support your doc. and make it over 500 words... it seemed to help. Dig deeper, and blast the truth, even if it is uncomfortable!
Truthbrary
Truthbrary
Canada
12 months ago: Or you might want to shorten your posts, loose the reffs. and write about sports, movie reviews or electronics... and you will be sure to get in with Google...
oh, post about 5-10 at a time... that might help too!
12 months ago: Or I could compromise the truth, tickle the ears of the audience, and post about general trivialities that don't offend anyone. That's the ticket!

I don't think so.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QhuBIkPX...

Homey don't play that.
owlafaye
owlafaye
Dayton, WA
Content Removed by owlafaye
owlafaye
owlafaye
Dayton, WA
Content Removed by owlafaye
owlafaye
owlafaye
Dayton, WA
7 months ago: On that day a work of so-called scientific literature hit the stands. It was a treatise that is still considered the foundation of evolutionary biology to many even today. This monument to the "advancement" of science and civilization was titled: "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life" by Charles Darwin.

How true Huey, how true!
12 months ago: I must be hitting the nail on the head. Reminds me of the Sex Ed piece I recently posted.

No contrarian comments, yet I know there are people out here who will read this that are staunch Darwinians. Figured a slap like this might bring them out of the closet, but I don't think they want to embarrass themselves.

I say, if the shoe fits, wear it.
Truthbrary
Truthbrary
Canada
12 months ago: Well, you read the book... "resist the devil and he will flee from you!" James 4:7
12 months ago: Wow! You mean the infantcide of millions of babies is a plan? Are you smoking something that needs a federal tax stamp? When exactly did Black History month begin? Not to be rude. It's a real question. I would like to know why the numbers of Black infantcide are not included as a method required to break free of the chains of bondage. How many have been flushed since the first Black History month? Is that not also a part of Black History?

Darwin sucks.

Huey. I know you won't take it wrong coming from this cracker.
That is the difference between the "mainstream" and the honest folk.

I can tell you what I think without you taking it as being "talked down" to.

There is the difference.

I think you should have used the entire N-word in your title. You think the site would have deleted it? HUH? Ni^^er as opposed to Nigger? Does it not in fact lessen the effect? Why sugar coat it?
12 months ago: Wow! You think? I would like to know why the infantcide of millions of babies are not listed as an acheivement to breaking free of the bondage.

When did it really start?

Next time don't sugar coat the word. We know that Ni^^er is meant to be Nigger. You think the sugar coating makes it acceptable? I know you won't take that suggestion from the sites most racist cracker the wrong way.

Darwin? Huh? Try the modern version.

Progressives.
12 months ago: Sorry, the first post had a RR error when posting. So I wrote the second one. I'll leave both of them so the Darwinists have something to flag.
12 months ago: TCG - were both eye to eye on the infanticide issue. It's disgusting and what makes it worse is that there are those in the black community that have still not figured it out. There are even others that support it and destroy their own people in the process. Not even a single twinge of conscience or remorse to bother them either. Makes me mad.

The most dangerous place for a baby to be is in a mother's womb. When we look at people of color the danger of snuffing out an unborn life gets even more likely and more imminent. The people need to be educated and this madness has to stop.

As far as my editing the title, I hear where you are coming from but I just don't like that word. I was using it for shock value but I included it in that "censored" form because I knew the possibility of it getting flagged. I wanted to make sure this message to got out. This is too important to sit on.

Also, I didn't want anyone to think that I endorse the use of that word. It's degrading and offensive and I would be glad to see it stricken from the language of everyone but I'm not naive enough to believe that it will happen any time soon.

You know me well and you know where this is leading. Stay tuned.

As always, thanks for your input.
12 months ago: 10-4 brother.

For those of you that are too lazy...

Search ... Rev, Clenard H Childress Jr ... and ... Blackgenocide ...

or visit...

http://www.blackgenocide.org/home.html

Peace on the Souls of the Unwanted Unborn...
Content Removed by Stan Five
12 months ago: Hear, hear for your anti-racist senitments, Huey.

Excellent.

However, it may be that you are not on familiar terms with Charles Darwin's actual work or its significance.

This might help you. http://rationalrevolution.net/articles/d...
12 months ago: Hi Stan.

The link contains a lot of words but does not rebutt in the least my post.

12 months ago: I look forward to reading your careful analysis of that article. I really would like to know what you have to say about the points raised in it.

Darwin, was just a man, but he did cary out science, the beauty of which is that it can be challenged, and improved upon, or discarded due to contrary evidence. George Washington Carver did the same thing.

However, our understaning of the domestication of animals, the creation of agricultural crops species such as wheat, our knowledge of inheritance, disease and DNA, and the commonality of life and particularly, the commonality of all mankind, all owe much to Darwin and to Carver

Africa is the origin of the human species. We know this, thanks to work that Darwin started. Darwin discovered things which were not known before his time. Ignorant racists often choose not to read him but pretend they know what he discovered.

I don't care whether anyone reveres Darwin or dislikes him. Big deal. Misrepresenting his work because ignorant racists say its all about abusing particular ethnicities is only promoting ignorance. You know that their are African scientists, who work in biology and genetics, right? Are they racists? They don't throw away Darwin because of how a gang of ignorant racists misrepresent science.

"As man advances in civilisation, and small tribes are united into larger communities, the simplest reason would tell each individual that he ought to extend his social instincts and sympathies to all the members of the same nation, though personally unknown to him. This point being once reached, there is only an artificial barrier to prevent his sympathies extending to the men of all nations and races. If, indeed, such men are separated from him by great differences in appearance or habits, experience unfortunately shews us how long it is, before we look at them as our fellow-creatures."
- Charles Darwin
12 months ago: I don't recall George Washington Carver publishing works that fly in the face of modern genetics.

As far as critiquing the article, I scanned the entire thing and found nothing new.

Also, arguments against the person are fallacious. It's not the racists that look for ways to critique Darwin, it's the exact opposite.

Darwin should be read in the light of modern science. It shows it up for what is is. Good try but still ends up postulating genetic impossibilities and a total ignorance of many scientific facts.

Not a real fault of Darwin but an indictment of those who take his work in this day and age as the irrefutable gospel truth.

At least Stan, you research. Most folk out there swallow stuff without even thinking.
owlafaye
owlafaye
Dayton, WA
7 months ago: Huey is not on familiar terms with much of anything in life actually. He is on very familiar terms with all that is in his life actually.

It comes in through a funnel and goes out his keyhole. The insularity of the tunnel Huey lives in gives him all the characteristics of a duck in the rain when it comes to a shower of knowledge.

HE WILL NOT CHANGE! Mark my word - laughter.
Truthbrary
Truthbrary
Canada
7 months ago: 0wlafaye,

See that's the thing about a man that is not wishy-washy and fickle... a man of character like Huey doesn't have to change... BTW if that's all you got... have a nice day !:]
12 months ago: Great piece and great food for thought too!
12 months ago: Hello SmartyGirl.

Thanks for stopping by.
Content Removed by smartygirl
12 months ago: I remember reading about Darwin's thought process before writing his famous work. Darwin wanted to go into the ministry but felt ill-equipped because he found himself doubting the existence of God. Here is the kicker. He didn't doubt God because he saw eloquence in natural selection but because he came from a family of really bad corrupt people. He could not see divine justice allowing people like his family members to live while the innocent died and so he concluded that it was illogical to conclude there is anything like divine justice, let alone a divine figure head.

His experience in the Galapagos ironically enough was a much needed excuse for his own troubled and warped point of view. His view on race and ethnic supremacy was common to most intellectuals and religious figure heads of his day. In actuality most modern people today either put out of their minds or are unaware of how much of our modern culture stems from ugly origins. Ford was a Nazi sympathizer and even helped fund distribution of Nazi propaganda here in the US.