Health

Rave

Cover Your Nose People; Someone Is Smoking In Here.

Posted 23 months ago|8 comments|1,307 views
This vice has been around 5,000 years!
VIDEOS
ADDITIONAL IMAGES
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
Written by
Siempre Solo
Auburn, NY
HERE IS PROOF THAT SMOKING IS BAD.

According to the CDC report: A call to action, “Tobacco use, particularly cigarette smoking, is the leading cause of preventable illness and death in the United States. Each year, more than 400,000 Americans die too young because of smoking-related diseases. Today, nearly one in four U.S. adults and one in three teenagers smoke. Tragically, if current trends continue, an estimated 25 million people (including 5 million of today’s children) will die prematurely of a smoking-related disease.” http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statisti...

The website Above the influence reports that, “Tobacco use is the leading preventable cause of disease, disability, and death in the United States. Between 1964 and 2004, cigarette smoking caused an estimated 12 million deaths, including 4.1 million deaths from cancer, and 5.5 million deaths from cardiovascular diseases. When smoking tobacco, the user inhales tar, nicotine, carbon monoxide, and 200 known poisons into the lungs. The nicotine in cigarettes is powerfully addictive.” http://www.abovetheinfluence.com/facts/d...#

WHY THEN DO PEOPLE SMOKE ?

People smoke because they can. The reasons vary from the inane to the sublime. Excuses such as: I enjoy the taste or it helps me relax are common, but there are those such as everyone in my family smokes or it’s my constitutional right. I feel the urge and I must fulfill it or I will start to feel sick should be the only real reason a person gives for smoking, because smoking is addictive. According to E Health MD, “A smoking addiction means a person has formed an uncontrollable dependence on cigarettes to the point where stopping smoking would cause severe emotional, mental, or physical reactions.”

They further report that, “Nicotine is the drug in tobacco that causes addiction. It is absorbed and enters the bloodstream, through the lungs when smoke is inhaled... Nicotine is a psychoactive drug with stimulant effects on the electrical activity of the brain. It also has calming effects, especially at times of stress, as well as effects on hormonal and other systems throughout the body. Although its subjective effects are less dramatic and obvious than those of some other addictive drugs, smoking doses of nicotine causes activation of "pleasure centers" in the brain (for example, the mesolimbic dopamine system), which may explain the pleasure, and addictiveness of smoking.”
http://www.ehealthmd.com/library/smoking...


BUT THERE ARE SOCIAL ISSUES AS WELL

“So smoking is bad and addictive, we knew that already. We still want to smoke.” This is a very common and well traveled line that is repeated across the country. It is also true. People do still want to smoke despite the health risks. Even after quitting with the help of physicians some former smokers will go back to smoking. The statistics on these are unclear because society doesn’t vie these as new smokers but just smokers. However if you ask a smoker if he has tried to quit he will usually give you a number between one and ten. Smokers do quit, often repeatedly but they return to their bad habit.

Nonsmokers usually don’t care why or they assume it is because of their addiction but there are other mitigating circumstances that if you are not a smoker you might not be privy to. Here are some examples.

1. Routine: We take for granted how important our routines can be to us but take away the morning cup of Java from coffee drinkers and they will tell you just how important that ritual is to them/

2. Camaraderie: You try to socially isolate yourself from the group of people who have been your biggest supporters for any length of time. Try it! See what happens.

3. Freedom/Equality: This one may seem like a stretch but ask a smoker candidly and they will tell you that few things in life are done outside of necessity. To smoke is to make a calculated risk. It is similar to the choice skydivers make. They take a calculated risk and they will tell you also that they feel free. They get a sense of oneness. This is why smokers feel their civil liberties challenged when nonsmokers protest.


I would like to think that it is not that complex but it is. Smokers connect socially to this vice and it is a painful separation for many to be extracted from these social interactions. Because it is not just the addiction but the social ostracizing that can be just as difficult and lets face it Doctors don’t treat the social stigma of being a nonsmoker. Non smokers are like untouchables. To smokers they are traitors and to nonsmokers they are potential powder kegs. This is a hard way to live which is why so many people return to smoking.


WHAT SHOULD WE DO AS A PEOPLE THEN?


This is the part that ironically enough is the easiest of all. We need to act as a people. We should not view each other as smokers or nonsmokers. We should not see each other as us against them. In our society it is currently okay to stereotype or discriminate against smokers. Nonsmokers can say the harshest things to smokers about their condition and their vices under the assumption that, since what they do is unhealthy that it is okay to put them down.

The stigma a smoker bears is in that sense very similar to that of a prostitute. People will look down on sex workers because of the way they make their money without showing the least bit of compassion. It is in these instances that the Christian Principle of, “Love the sinner. Hate the sin” should be put into practice. We should remember that we are not what we do. We do what we do for reasons that may change if we are given an opportunity and showing compassion and empathy for another’s troubles is the best way to open up venues for change to those that are seeking them.

In a similar manner smokers should also be patient with nonsmokers. Try to envision what your life without smoking might be like. Try to be respectful when practicing your habit. This is a choice you made for yourself. It is not fair to drag others into it unwillingly. The important thing to keep in mind is that we all must share a common space and the keyword here is share.

I am Siempre Solo, your voice, we have spoken!


FYI: I’m trying on a new catchphrase. I’m thinking it sounds a bit pretentious unless of course the readers agree with what I wrote. Please tell me your opinion.

Thanks for reading!
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
23 months ago: People should be free to do whatever they like, in private, on their own dime. That includes picking your nose, scratching your privates, and smoking cigarettes. The problems arise when smokers assume incorrectly that their behavior is a RIGHT. Plenty of court findings have established without question that smoking is not a right but just a chosen personal habit. As with urinating and spitting, it is behavior repulsive to others and should be kept private. Others do not wish to smell smokers or watch them debase themselves with their ugly habit.
Siempre Solo
Siempre Solo
Auburn, NY
23 months ago: Interesting perspective, thanks!
snowbird
snowbird
Canada
23 months ago: Government gone wild

The bandwagon of local smoking bans now steamrolling from sea to sea
has nothing to do with protecting people from the "threat of second-hand
smoke" but are themselves symptoms of a far more grievous threat: a
cancer that has been spreading for decades throughout the body politic,
reaching even the tiniest organs of local government. This cancer is the
only real hazard involved - the cancer of unlimited government power.

The issue is not whether second-hand smoke is a real danger or a phantom
menace but rather, if it were harmful, what would be the proper reaction?
Should anti-smoking activists satisfy themselves with educating people
about the potential danger and allow them to make their own decisions,
or should they seize the power of government and force people to make
the “right” decision?

It seems they've made their choice. Loudly billed as measures that only
affect “public places,” they have actually targeted private places: restaurants,
bars, nightclubs, shops, and offices - places whose owners are free to set
anti-smoking rules or whose customers are free to go elsewhere if they don't
like the smoke. Some local bans even harass smokers outdoors.

The decision to smoke or to avoid “second-hand” smoke, should be made by
each individual according to his own values and assessment of the risks.
This is the same kind of decision free people make regarding every aspect of
their lives: how much to spend or invest, whom to befriend or love, whether
to go to college or get a job, whether to get married or divorced, and so on.

All these decisions involve risks; some may have harmful consequences or
invite disapproval from others. But the individual must be free to make these
decisions because his life belongs to him, not to others, and only his own
judgment can guide him through it.

Yet when it comes to smoking, this freedom is under attack. Smokers are
a minority, practicing a habit often considered annoying and unpleasant to
the majority. So the majority has simply commandeered the power of
government and used it to dictate their behaviour.

That is why these bans are far more threatening than few stray whiffs of
tobacco smoke while waiting for a table at your favourite restaurant. The
anti-smoking crusaders point in exaggerated alarm at those tiny wisps while
they unleash the systematic and unlimited intrusion of government into our lives.

Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
23 months ago: Smoking is a right. Forcing others to breath smoke is a violation of their rights. One person's rights end where another person's begins. A restaurant owner has the right to refuse service to anyone he chooses, provided it's not for reasons of race, creed, color, sex, age, or national origin. Unless it's a bar, or an adult themed store, then age comes into play. Or if it is a minor requesting cigarettes, then the proprietor is forced to discriminate based on age.

People are basically stupid. They don't have enough sense to decide for themselves not to go into a smoky bar or restaurant. Then they get lung cancer and emphysema, along with being drunk and fat.

How many carcinogens do you breathe in while traveling down a busy highway?
How many do you get at a barbecue? That's a lot of smoke coming out of Strick's Family Barbecue every day, and people line up to the street to eat the smoke that sticks to the meat.
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
23 months ago: I could see banning smoking in a car with children inside. The children don't have a choice. But adults do. Banning cigarettes in the workplace makes sense too. OSHA has been striving for safer working environments with little or no friction from the public. Which I guess would include restaurants, bars, bowling alleys, anywhere there are people making a living.
THE RONBOT HUNTER
THE RONBOT HUNTER
23 months ago: Do you know what full and complete disclosure means?

The cigarette companies do not pay attention to this rule of contract law.

They add many poisons (arsenic or cyanide) in the tobacco leaves and many other chemicals.

They do this to meat and many forms of natural foods to kill the parasites and germs.

The corporations do not respect you or your life. It is a profit world we live in.

The statutes (color of law) are made by attorneys who sell their time regardless of the harm that they do.

You must complain to get your rights back.

That means DEMAND FULL AND COMPLETE DISCLOSURE.


THE RONBOT HUNTER
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

http://freedom-school.com/law/prison_tre...

http://freedom-school.com/keating/how-a-...

http://freedom-school.com/admiralty/how-...

23 months ago: If somebody were to pick their nose and wipe the solid wastes on your clothes, you would object.

If somebody were to spit in your face, you could file a civil suit against them alleging assault and battery.

But somehow smokers seem to assume that so long as the wastes discharged from their noses are gaseous rather than solid, they are to be accepted.

And a smoker who smokes where others are forced without their consent to put up with seeing and smelling him is guilty of an act of assault. It is a proper function of government to inhibit such use of force or fraud.
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
23 months ago: fra59e

Do you really mean that merely seeing someone smoking is an assault on you? Even in an outside area?
How far are you willing to go with that sentiment? Car exhausts? STD's? Being in public with a known contagious disease, such as the the flu or the common cold? What about talking too loud? Jackhammers? Jet planes? Train whistles?
Where do you draw the line?


Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.