Science & Technology

Rave

Computer designed to compose music

Posted 23 months ago|3 comments|634 views
VIDEOS
Written by
RLwoods
Victorville, CA
What is it about Beethhoven that makes us want to listen to his work? What about Bach? What is it that makes music itself so enjoyable to listen to? IS it the fact that it has a wondergul rhythm that we can dance to?

There is much debate over this, but overall, I thought that everyone atleast admitted that music was music no matter who made it and that enjoyable music should be heard and shared regaurdlesss of how it was made.

There is a new music album out now that makes us question even this basic idea. This is because music while normally being a medium for creativity. And this artist is a very special artist. This artist is not known for being emotional, nor is this artist known for even being able have emotions.

This artist is Emily Howell, Emily is a new artist on the scene, but she is not criticized on her music capability. No, she is criticized because she happens to be a computer.

David Cope, a professor from the University of California, is the creator and programmer of Emily. When he was asked about computers ability to create he answered," Can computers be creative? In the sense that they are creating something that wasn't there before, yes.. But so can birds and insects and volcanoes. We have reserved this notion of creativity for humans for a long time, and we are enamored of it".

The origins of Emily are fairly interesting. Emily started off as a program that Cope developed in order to help him make his own music. What it does is analyze the styles of other sources of music, and learns some basic music styles, and then combines them to form its own musical style.

He gave Emily a human name because he wanted people to think of It without any
sort of bias based on it being a computer and from the results that he got, it was made quite obvious that once they were told that Emily was a computer, their enthusiasm for the music began to fade away.

The primary source for the dislike of Emily comes from composers that are threatened by this. Seeing a sort of replacement. A new rival to their own jobs that is not even human.

I don't see a threat here, I only see a new musical tool. When musicians started using computers in the recording studio, there was no outcry like this. This is a machine and cannot take away real emotional content, that is something that only something living can do, I think we could use technology to extend our own musical endeavors just as we do with any other place that a machine was put into place.
In fact, i think one of the best things about this, is that we have a music artist from this century that wont be caught in some scandal and clogging up our news with celebrity gossip.

For links to other articles I've written
http://rlwoodsiii.blogspot.com/
For the original article about it
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/hot-cla...
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
22 months ago: When Cameras came out people complained that this would mean the end of art.

There is always resistance to change. Once computers and robots learn how to create even more powerful and intelligent computers and robots, their evolution will increase at an astronomical rate. Self Awareness and Creativity are inevitable once the basic processes are understood.

Eventually we will have a new race of beings on the planet. I just hope that they consider us with a benign regard and will protect their creators as envisioned by Asimov with his three laws of robotics.

Unfortunately the major investor in robotics development and engineering is the military so they could evolve as envisioned by the Terminator or Berserker series.
RLwoods
RLwoods
Victorville, CA
22 months ago: There is an element that lies in every living thing that is entirely mechanical.
We ourselves are little more than meat robots coverd with skin.

the AI constricts that are designed for the military adr designed with two parts, the part that identifies the environment objects, and then deciphers which part in its view is what it is programmed to seek after. The second part is taking the data and processing an object to point directly at it in the real world. It is us that puts weapons in the hands of the robot. That same sort of idea could be used for medical research, it could be used to find missing people. we choose to use them for weapons.

i feel that once the machienes are capable of maintaining self awareness and creativity it will also develop ethics. Ones that would revolve around self protection, and procration of their "kind".

i think that once we hit that point, both of us would have to evolve to a point that violence is past us. in order to protect ourselves, we will need to teach them that they dont need to protect themselves. and vice versa.

we would then begin immediately learn from each other.
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
22 months ago: I hope you are right, but people tend to fear that which they do not understand. And Robots in the future will be superior to people in strength quickness and mental abilities. Unless they are constrained by something similar to Asimov's laws, people will fear them and some will try to destroy them.

On the other hand why should they fear a tool designed to help them?

A rich field of speculation that has been extensively explored in Sci Fi.

I think that if there is life on other planets it will be the electro-mechanical species that will visit, just because of the vast spaces and times involved. I do believe that they will have evolved past the petty bickering that our species is so prone to.

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.