Economy

Rave

Are There Any Good Banks?

Posted 12 months ago|5 comments|529 views
A Bank For The People?
VIDEOS
Written by
Altruist
Eugene, OR
We are all aware now of the abuses of the investment banks. How they took government money and invested that in risky ventures. How they give away million dollar bonuses to their CEO's and traders, for those who trade in hedge funds and phony derivatives. The investment banks are in it to make profits even if they destroy the economy. http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/01/t...

Many banks, like Chase Bank received TARP funds to bail them out, yet they have done nothing to clean up the economic mess they made. They are not lending, they are not fixing the foreclosure problem and they are not paying their fair share of taxes. Our cities, states and counties are in a revenue crisis. Average taxpayers are paying their fair share, but the big banks are not. http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/05...

What would happen if banks actually did what they were originally designed to do and lent money to those who needed it? What if small businesses could actually get started, expand, grow, and hire people? What would happen if people could actually re-finance their homes and get out of the usurious interest rates and into a home loan they can actually afford to pay, so they don't have to loose their homes?

What would happen if banks actually worked to help the people, and the immense profits of the banks went back to the people? What would happen if the States were willing to provide low interest loans and use the billions of dollars of profit the banks make, to pay off their deficits?

Today most states are faced with record deficits and bankruptcies and have a hard time raising revenue for things like pension systems. One State however doesn't have to rely on Wall Street, They can invest in their own people. North Dakota currently has the nation's only publicly owned bank. This bank has had seven straight years of profits. This year the public received a record $62 million in profit from their bank.

Because of the success of the Bank of North Dakota eleven other States are considering State owned banks of their own.

"The Center for State Innovation, based in Madison, Wisconsin, was commissioned to do detailed analyses for the Washington and Oregon bills. Their conclusion was that a state-owned bank on the model of the Bank of North Dakota would have a substantial positive impact in those states, increasing employment, new lending and government revenue."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ellen-brow...
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
Coloranter Raver
Coloranter Raver
Denver, CO
12 months ago: Interesting. Also interesting are Islamic banks which operate on a different principle than so-called western bank.
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
12 months ago: Yes according to Sharia law you can't profit from charging interest, or by dealing with weapons, drugs, or alcohol.

Of course the Taliban buys their guns by providing 90% of the heroin for Europe, and while Sharia financial institutions technically may not charge interest, they get around that stricture by charging fees to accomplish the same thing with something called a sukuk, and all of the worst abuses of the banks like hedge funds, options, puts, calls and arbitrage contracts are used in Sharia financial institutions. http://phillips.blogs.com/goc/2005/06/sh...
Coloranter Raver
Coloranter Raver
Denver, CO
12 months ago: Let's not be also guilty of indicitng an entire religion or the majority of the practicitioners based on the misterpretations and exploitations of a few.

The principle point of Islamic banks being that when they loan you money, they become a partner in your business. If you fail, they fail. Since they cannot earn money off of money, they have to help you become successful to get their principle and earnings back. Rather than you still owing them money and interest. It's actually a very, very different concept when it comes to banking and loans.
12 months ago: so the state should control the banks and the means of production, to free up the common man from economic realities so he can just follow orders.

fine ideas. Marx and Engel agree, as do Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Mengistu, Chavez, Castro. And Mohammed agrees. fine company you keep.

Reality disagrees. 200 million killed inside marxist states in the 20th century- they would also disagree, if they hadn't been murdered. And the civilizations and 100's of millions killed 1400 years of jihad and the ring of fire- they would also disagree.

Your hopes and wishes to control men are repugnant to western civilization, as you know.
Peace be unto you, comrade.

Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
12 months ago: That happens when the State controls the people, but it doesn't happen when the people control the state. We need to remove the corporations from the control of the government and return it to the people. After all it is supposed to be a government of, by, and for the people - not the corporations.

Conservatives are so afraid of socialism that they think of the Communists as the only socialist form of government, but there are socialist aspects of all modern governments and many "Socialist" states like the Scandinavian countries that have citizens that enjoy more freedoms and are happier than we are. The top 10 countries, when it comes to well-being:

Denmark
Sweden
Canada
Australia
Finland
Venezuela
Israel
New Zealand
Netherlands
Ireland


Read more: http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/04/20/what...

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.