"The people's choice was, overwhelmingly, Julian Assange. Assange got more votes than the next two highest candidates combined (Lady Gaga and the Prime Minister of Turkey, in case you were wondering). Zuckerberg ran a very distant 10th, with fewer than 5% of the number of votes cast for Assange." -"We The People"
"In less than seven years, Zuckerberg wired together a twelfth of humanity into a single network, thereby creating a social entity almost twice as large as the U.S. If Facebook were a country it would be the third largest." -TIME's Lev Grossman
http://blogs.computerworld.com/17534/in_...Some TIMEs people can't be trusted know what is right and and others need to make those important decisions... like who is the most "important" person in 2010... yet other TIMEs you can let people decide what is "important" like if President Obama is a Muslim or a Christian:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics..."Who Will Be TIME's 2010 Person of the Year?
... now that voting has closed, view the final ratings — though TIME's editors who choose the actual Person of the Year reserve the right to disagree"
http://www.time.com/time/specials/packag...It seems TIMEs are a changing... might be TIME to choose another magazine to read, and high TIME to send a message to those "important" people. TIME is NOT of the assange in this case! TIME magazine subscriptors should reserve their right to disagree!