OK. This may sound a little harsh, but it's got to be said. If the new Rielle Hunter pictures were posed without a gun to her head, she's got no right to complain about them.
I guarantee you that she was paid handsomely for the official Rielle Hunter GQ interview. We're talking contracts and lawyers. She knew exactly what she was getting into: the Rielle Hunter pictures that are splashed all over the Internet today were no surprise to her and her legal team.
As a sometime videographer and mother of John Edwards child, the Rielle Hunter pictures are NOT surprising. The "racy" pictures of Rielle Hunter that were printed in the new issue of GQ were set up, staged, and hardly exploitative. She has no right to complain – like she just did this morning on The View.
Barbara Walters said she had talked to Hunter, on Monday morning, and that Hunter had "cried for two hours" upon seeing the images and deemed them "repulsive."
Really? The rather tame Rielle Hunter pictures are "repulsive"? In what way?
If you haven't read the GQ interview, you should really
check it out. It's absurd. This woman single-handedly torpedoed John Edward's political career and she's busy suing for copies of a sex tape she made -- the pictures of Reille Hunter are hardly her biggest problem right now.
What do you think about the Rielle Hunter pictures? Was she exploited?