News & Politics

Rant

The Reign of Terror

Posted 7 months ago|8 comments|923 views
Predator drone
Written by
In 1793, a young French Republic created The Committee of Public Safety with a main role of protecting the republic against foreign attacks and internal rebellion. The rule of this committee, known in history as the Reign of Terror, remains one of the darkest periods of France.

In 2011, an old US, formed a secret panel to draft up a roster of names to include on the hit list as enemies of the state and, supposedly, the President of USA can only veto or approve those actions. However, this committee does not keep a record of their rulings and no laws exist that establish its operation procedure or existence whatsoever.

CIA-led drone strike in Yemen killed two American citizens, al-Awlaki and Khan. They were never formally charged with a crime or brought to trial. The secret committee decided that they had ties with al-Qaeda, connections to the September 11 terrorist attacks and put their names on the list. This creates a dangerous precedent that US Government can kill anyone it perceives as a threat, including its own citizens, without bringing them to trial.

In 1793, The Committee of Public Safety operated within certain rules. For example, they never executed anybody without trial. The Law of Suspects created revolutionary tribunals to try those suspected of treason against the Republic and punish those convicted with death at the Guillotine.

How long until US Government decides that journalists that are condemning its actions pose a threat and includes their name on "The List?" When journalist Camille Desmoulins, while strong supporter of the Committee at the beginning, turned his pen against the Committee of Public Safety, he promptly got arrested and, after a short trial, guillotined on April 5, 1794.

The wheel of time turns and somehow, it seems appropriate to end this with a quote from a Desmoulins's letter to his wife – "I have dreamed of a Republic such as all the world would have adored. I could never have believed that men could be so ferocious and so unjust."
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
7 months ago: It sets a precedent that they can kill those suspected opponents openly. They've been doing it clandestinely for quite a while.
7 months ago: True! Every government in the world was doing such things clandestinely. Only a few governments (Soviet Union and Nazi Germany come to mind) did such things openly without answering to anybody.

You know, the real question isn't if they killed the guilty. The real question is who's next and where will it end?
7 months ago: There is going to come a time when people will understand...

"they worshiped the dragon because he gave his authority to the beast; and they worshiped the beast, saying, "Who is like the beast, and who is able to wage war with him?" (Revelation 13:4)
7 months ago: "If anyone is to be taken captive,
to captivity he goes;
if anyone is to be slain with the sword,
with the sword must he be slain."
(Revelation 13:10)

I have to wonder why is US building a $100 million prison in Afghanistan...
http://www.rantrave.com/Rant/Before-we-w...
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
7 months ago: The Constitution was written to protect the minorities from the tyranny of the majority and to guarantee basic rights to every American. It is clearly unconstitutional.

We are using drones because it is a way to strike the enemy without endangering our own troops.

The bad part is that often innocent civilians die. It is good that we took out the leaders of Al Queda, but it results in 10 times as many innocent people being killed. If we create 3 recruits to Al Queda for every innocent civilian we kill, it is like cutting off the head of a hydra.

Another bad thing is that it is sort of cowardly. Next thing is we will be sending in robots to do our fighting for us. It makes war and killing too easy. What if the machines have a hard time telling friend from foe and think all humans are bad? Terminator anyone?

Also when we do these things in sovereign nations we loose allies, and we destroy the rule of international law.
7 months ago: I agree that it is clearly unconstitutional. Now, who dares to question this committee? Who dares to do anything against the powers that be? Which American citizen is next on their list?
7 months ago: And just imagine what happens when the drones get infected by a virus. It allready happened, who says it can't happen again?
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/10/...
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
7 months ago: Ron Paul is concerned that drones might be used to target non terrorists. like journalists that refuse to follow the party line. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44790188/ns/...#.TpKPjXKLPbk

This is a valid concern. During the invasion of Iraq journalists that refused to be embedded with the Army (and thus fed only what the Army wanted them to know) were threatened and the hotel that 100 journalists were in was attacked by a US abrahms tank killing 12 journalists. http://www.oilempire.us/mediawar.html

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.