Arts & Entertainment

Rant

Super Bowl Rejects Gay Ad

Posted 7 months ago|13 comments|620 views
Written by
CBS who will be broadcasting the Super Bowl this year has rejected a 30-second commercial from ManCrunch.com. The spot shows two men groping each other. CBS has informed the site that they are rejecting it based on the creative is not within the network’s broadcast standards for Super Bowl Sunday.

"If it were a heterosexual couple or even two women, it probably would have gotten approved," Elissa Buchter, a representative for ManCrunch, said.

All of this comes right after CBS decided to accept an apparent pro-life commercial featuring Tim Tebow, the University of Florida quarterback. The ad was paid for by Focus on the Family, a Christian group. Many women’s groups have objected to CBS accepting this commercial.

I’m beginning to think that CBS is falling under the statement, “Damned if you do, and damned if you don’t.” I understand that with all the recent fall out CBS is now more gun shy. They have rejected a commercial from Go Daddy Inc. because it had the potential to offend a significant number of people.

Broadcasters have a narrow line they need to follow. Make their advertisers happy, their stockholders happy and still not make the FCC unhappy. This is not an easy situation to have to do business in.
EMAIL| SHARE|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
TheLegendTomWing
TheLegendTomWing
 Moderator
Havertown, PA
7 months ago: Crazy, personally, if the ad is hilarious, who cares what it's for.
7 months ago: It is their choice whether to air it but I think it was a good choice from a pr perspective the target audience is aimed to heterosexual males not bi-sexual males. So why would they air a bi-sexual ad when the majority of the target audience is not gay?
Siempre Solo
Siempre Solo
Auburn, NY
7 months ago: Wait a darn minute here! Isn’t the whole game of American football filled with grown men in tight fitting pants groping each other and isn’t the whole point of a TV Commercial to give the viewer a much needed distraction by way of a sales pitch? Why on earth would anyone want to spend their precious commercial TV spot on some more guy groping when they have the rest of the Super bowl to watch that?
7 months ago: They are selling to the majority in population.

Gays will never be the majority in population, any where in the world.

This is pure business and profits.

if gays gave them more profits not even 1000 lawsuits a day would stop them.

MONEY MAKES THE WORLD GO ROUND.

THE RONBOT HUNTER
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
markbyrn
markbyrn
 Moderator
7 months ago: I imagine "ManCrunch" is quite happy about the rejection - they get all this free PR and they don't have to pay for the commercial. If CBS has said yes to the commercial, they probably didn't have the funds to pay for it anyway.

Now who here clicked on the "ManCrunch" link?!

*TWEET* *TWEET*
7 months ago: Actually, Ronbot, they are selling to the advertisers, not the viewers. As far as CBS's bottom line is concerned, it doesn't matter how many people respond to the commercials. CBS has not issued a statement about why it decided not to accept the gay site's ad. Until then, it's all purely speculation, and possibly an advertising bonanza for a site that won't have to pay a dime for all the free publicity it can handle.
7 months ago: Geeze, dude.

You beat me by four minutes. If I hadn't taken time to look for a statement by CBS.... sigh.
7 months ago: You are right, and so am I, The advertiser are themselves selling to the majority in population too.

They want to sell or buy advertising time to make the most profit from the most people.

You are not looking at the big picture.
It is all about money.

Gays do not have the numbers for advertisers, to spend millions to attract their buying their products.

Bad news gives free publicity, and it adds to the profits.

THE RONBOT HUNTER
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
7 months ago: It is still about ratings if you look at the amount of channels airing the superbowl cbs is just one of many. If I seen that add on a channel I would have turned it to another channel.

Even though cbs sold that time slot they make money off how many people continue watching the full game on cbs so the ratings still count. So from a pr perspective if the advertisement doesn't not fit the target audience then they should not run it or if they could lose ratings from the advertisement then it is in their rights not to air it.
7 months ago: I should say it was a stupid advertisement anyways how was it funny? This is probably not the first time an advertisement did not meet cbs standards nor the last time. To be a successful superbowl ad you want your audience talking about it 6 months later but with the mancrunch ad I could bet you no one will even remember it in a few weeks from now.
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
7 months ago: It's hard to imagine that this "dating service" could generate enough income from the ad to pay the multimillion dollar bill. The ad while funny would probably generate church pressured boycotts. Who needs that?
The Cypress Gang
The Cypress Gang
Cypress, TX
7 months ago: Is his name "Buck"?
7 months ago: These arguments are baloney. Gay people drink beer, send packages with Fedex, use GoDaddy services etc, just the same as the rest of the world. Oh and we watch the Super Bowl too. We are every bit as much part of the advertisers' target, and every bit a much part of the show's audience.

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.