News & Politics

Rant

Stupak Gives His Souls To Obama For Nothing!

Posted 19 months ago|12 comments|1,016 views
Written by
"We've been able to come up with an agreement to respect the sanctity of life on health care reform. There will be no public funding for abortion in this legislation. We've all stood on principle."

Those were the words of Congressman Bart Stupak on March 21, 2010. The day healthcare passed, the day Bart Stupak sold out himself and sold out America by accepting a shoddy Executive Order instead of a solid amendment to the healthcare plan explicitly banning federal funds being used to fund abortion. Now fast-forward to today and the first healthcare plans funded by the government are going into affect and those plans will pay for abortions.

The "High Risk Pool" which is one of the first aspects to Obama Care to come online is starting to roll out in about 23 states. This pool covers the people with preexisting conditions that would not otherwise be able to get healthcare.

Pennsylvania is one of the first states to get up and running with the High Risk Pool receiving about 162 million from the federal government. This money will help Pennsylvania subsidize the cost of these insurance plans. These plans cover abortion services. That of course is the loophole. The federal money is not being spent directly on abortion, it is just being used to pay for the plans that covers abortions.

According to the text of Patient Protection and Health Care Act the healthcare plans can cover any type of abortion for any reasons that do not contradict existing state law. In Pennsylvania abortion is legal for any reason other than to determine the sex of the child.

So there you have it. Bart Stupak ruined his carreer in politics for a President who played him.
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
Jambos
Jambos
State College, PA
19 months ago: Since all HHS monies are subject to the Hyde Amendment, high risk pool funds cannot be used to pay for abortions, even in Pennsylvania. But never let facts get in the way of a good rant/conspiracy theory, right?
Jambos
Jambos
State College, PA
Content Removed by Jambos
19 months ago: Jambos, Hay Killer,
Don't try to hide behind the Hyde Amendment, as the monies used do not fall under their annual appropriations bill (funding), but under the new health care law ( HHS Recovery Act Funds).

http://www.hhs.gov/recovery/reports/plan...

Read the Law. Oh and don't let facts get in the way of a Goverment Con.

The Hyde Amendment applies only to funds allocated by the annual appropriations bill for the Department of Health and Human Services.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyde_Amendm...

Content Removed by CheckThat
19 months ago: I already said it was a loophole Jambos....read the text

http://docs.house.gov/energycommerce/ppa...
Jambos
Jambos
State College, PA
19 months ago: You're confusing issues here. The abortion language is clearly as it relates to the Exchanges in 2014...which are merely conduits for consumers to buy insurance from the Blues and private insurers, i.e., not federally funded health insurance coverage, rather a federally funded 'marketplace' for consumers to choose coverage. It is therefore more than logical for them to state that they won't try and supplant State law in that case. That has NOTHING to do with the high risk pools...which CAN'T fund abortions, Hyde amendment DOES apply. It's a fabricated storm in a tea cup.
19 months ago: No it doesn't...this article lays it out pretty well...

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/6938...

Federal funds are being used to subsidize health insurance plans that cover abortions.
Jambos
Jambos
State College, PA
19 months ago: And I can find articles which are equally skewed refuting that based on an agenda. But I won't. It bores me. I prefer facts. When the PA Governor comes out and says, yes, we're all for abortion for the high risk pool program, wake me up. And the approved PA High Risk Pool proposal was apparently posted June 1st...what is that, 43, 44 days ago?...WITH a press release on the PA Insurance Commission website that accompanies the posting...not exactly a sneaky nefarious move...but you'll keep believing what you want to believe regardless of what I type. I'll stick with the facts. Best regards.
Jambos
Jambos
State College, PA
19 months ago: And I mean it when I say, you appear on the surface (though I'm sure a great person) who would have bought into the idea that gay marriage in MA would have led to humans marrying their dogs.

Hyperbole is not productive.
19 months ago: did you read the text of the act? I gave the article to try and simplify the explanation.
Jambos
Jambos
State College, PA
19 months ago: I read everything...thus I know you are confused...but also wrong...
19 months ago: Great work Harshaw. Unless a person has been living under a rock in an Obama T-shirt it should be clearer by the day that this administration is determined to push its far left agenda through. Be it by back door, window or the cracks in the floor.
Content Removed by CheckThat
19 months ago: Nice picture. Stupak really does look like a pig. Can we say "next on the list"?
Jambos
Jambos
State College, PA
19 months ago: Well fancy that...from the PA Insurance Commission website:

Pennsylvania Insurance Department statement:

"Pennsylvania will – and has always intended to – comply with the federal ban on abortion funding in the coverage provided through our federally funded high risk pool. This program will provide much-needed assistance for the sickest of the sick. The likelihood that any of those covered will seek abortion services is remote, but if they do need such services, they will have to pay for them out their own pocket.

Our pending contract with Health and Human Services (HHS) makes it crystal clear that we will "operate the Program in compliance with federal law and the forthcoming final federal regulations." This has always meant that the existing federal ban on abortion funding would be followed, with the restrictions that permit abortion services in the instance of rape, incest or endangering the mother.

Pennsylvania's position is not a statement about the broader abortion debate. It simply recognizes that health care reform, particularly extending health coverage to those with preexisting conditions, is too important a priority to be hijacked by those who seek to turn common-sense health reforms into a rancorous debate about whether the federal ban on abortion funding is too broad or too narrow. These efforts failed to derail health reform this spring and they will fail to stop much-needed coverage for thousands of Pennsylvanians now.

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.