News & Politics

Rant

Socialists in America

Posted 33 months ago|3 comments|789 views
Written by
JAK Gladney
Saint Albans, WV
The photo at left was taken in 1912. At photo left, on the platform leaning over the banner, is Eugene V. Debs, the Socialist Party candidate for president. The collections at Indiana State University are full of pictures just like this one, with Debs inciting standing-room only crowds in towns large and small: Knoxville, Tennessee; Waterbury, Connecticut; Canton, Ohio; his hometown, Terre Haute, Indiana. Over 15,000 people paid between 5 cents and $1 to hear him speak in New York’s Madison Square Garden.

Debs would receive almost 1 million popular votes that year (of the “counted” Socialist votes)—6% of the popular votes cast in that election. His appeal was greatest in states traditionally thought of as the American Heartland—Ohio, Illinois, Oklahoma, Indiana, Wisconsin. In 1920, Debs drew slightly larger popular vote totals: remarkable, considering that Debs campaigned from a prison cell. He had been jailed on charges of “sedition,” a consequence of his opposition to World War I, and had to be transferred from the West Virginia State Penitentiary in Moundsville—where he received sympathetic treatment from both the warden and his jailors—to a maximum security penitentiary in Atlanta.

At the turn of the last century, socialism was far from the crackpot hobby or rhetorical bugaboo it has since become. In 1910, the citizens of Milwaukee elected Emil Seidel, the nation’s first Socialist mayor: by 1911, there were seventy-three elected Socialist mayors. Socialists on the municipal level lobbied for, and won, control of local waterworks and streetcar lines—hence the term “public
utilities”. “Nationalist” or “Bellamy” clubs, based on the socialist utopia expressed in Edward Bellamy’s best-selling novel Looking Backward, were commonplace, and other popular writers like Jack London and Upton Sinclair advanced Socialist ideas. Coal, copper and silver miners; farmers and railway workers; middle-class merchants—all could and did vote Socialist.

So, where did Socialism—the political movement—go?

World War I became the first of many serious public relations hits. Labor unions aligned with Socialist politics—first the Western Federation of Miners (WFM), then the larger Industrial Workers of the World (IWW, popularly known as “the Wobblies”)—resisted mobilization. Striking for eight-hour workdays, an end to child labor, and minimum wage laws during wartime became synonymous with disloyalty—a perception aided by frequent and bloody clashes between troops and strikers.

Industry management formed “loyalty leagues” and forced employees to choose: enroll and continue working, or be seen as “pro-I.W.W”. In 1917 in Bisbee, Arizona, 1,187 striking miners were instructed to return to work or be deported. The twelve hundred who refused to return to work were put into cattle cars and sent to Hermanas, New Mexico, where they remained, under armed guard, for two months. I.W.W. offices across the country were raided by Civilian Protective Leagues, and the Centralia, Oregon offices of the I.W.W. were twice ransacked by members of the local American Legion—once on Red Cross Parade Day in 1918, then on Armistice Day in 1919. The second raid ended in bloodshed when one of the Centralia Wobblies, determined not to lose the second I.W.W. headquarters to vandalism, fired on and killed one of the Legionnaires. The shooter, Wesley Everest, was dragged from his cell, castrated, and lynched from a local bridge. His lifeless body was used for target practice, a fate similar to that of Butte, Montana labor organizer Frank Little.

I’ve often said that I see broad similarities in the turn of the last century and the turn of this century. While the role of labor unions in American life has diminished, political polarization and radicalization is on the rise. The uncertainty that attends the dawn of a new century, much less a new millennium, accounts for much. The loss of social organizations—secular and religious—that once answered these anxieties is another contributor. But the outlook of the respective generations has fundamentally changed. That Edward Bellamy titled his novel Looking Backward is deceptive: his characters are not in the least bit sentimental. The past that Julian West reflects upon is a kind of Dark Age; the future is an opportunity to leave the worst behind. Even the grimmest social reformer believed in the progression of humanity—through science, through common cause—as an article of faith. Eugene Debs is famous for saying, “While there is a lower class I am in it; while there is a criminal element I am of it; while there is a soul in prison, I am not free”—a mirror, to quote Kurt Vonnegut, of the Sermon on the Mount, Debs’ unique evangelism.

In our own era, I know what most of my fellow citizens are against. I hear less about what drives them forward. We are more backlash and less revolutionary, and there is no convenient scapegoat—no seventy-three Socialist mayors, no great union for them to infiltrate, no broad culture to support their popular literature, much less sophisticated economic theory. And no faith in progress. We are a mob without a monster to chase.
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
33 months ago: Well written and informative as usual JAK.
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
33 months ago: I believe that, just as the States' Rights platform dissolved and was largely absorbed by the Republican party, which used to be in favor of smaller government and self-determination, the majority of the Socialist Party remnants, through lack of widespread support of its ideals, naturally gravitated to the Democrat party, where they have slapped some lipstick on those ideals.
It was very good observation you made, in the notion that in times of uncertainty, many people feel safer gathering in mobs. There must be a feeling of of being cocooned, knowing that you have someone at your back, and at your side, and that you have someone's back and side.
Three major drawbacks to this philosophy, and probably the reason it never took hold in America until now, is that mob mentality is very volatile, not easy to control, and prone to flights of panic.
The second drawback is the inclination of a few to take advantage of the common people. The use of labor unions by organized crime to achieve wealth and power is a prime example.
The other, is that when the waters of adversity rise, and there aren't enough rafts to go around, the only way to survive is to climb your way over your fellow man. You can't just float.
Financially speaking, there is great wisdom in the old saying, "Never put all your eggs in the same basket."
JAK Gladney
JAK Gladney
Saint Albans, WV
33 months ago: The Socialist Party, like the IWW, was hurt in the broader culture by its absorption of political "undesirables"--blacks, Latinos, Eastern European immigrants, unskilled laborers. The AFL's refusal to open its rolls to these people prompted the formation of the IWW. And it didn't help that the IWW rarely shied away from violence or sabotage.

We hear the same sort of criticism during the McCarthyism scare and later--it's not a coincidence that Martin Luther King, Jr., and even notable black entertainers, were labeled "Communist" by their critics--the charge resonated with people familiar with earlier battles. But by that point, I think, socialism (all fundamentally "collectivist" politics) as a viable grassroots political movement in the US was dead--it was mostly an intellectual or academic plaything, where it's remained.

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.