Culture & Lifestyle

Rant

Scientology: E-Meters use and effects

Posted 31 months ago|24 comments|1,086 views
Written by
DeanFox
England
Members of the organisation calling itself the church of scientology both staff and public subscribers, independent scientologists and Freezoners all use the "e-meter" at some point as part of their scientology practices.

What follows is their understanding of how it works, which is followed by the pitfalls and how the organisation calling itself the church of scientology abuses the e-meter in ritualised confessionals and security checks and how it abuses the auditing practice to its own ends.

The e-meter basically measures the resistance of the body by passing a low voltage current through the body via 2 tin cans, one held in each hand of the subject.

The resistance of an individual's body is related to the condition of the body however resistance is also caused by mental masses in and around the body. These mental masses cause the resistance to increase, making the needle on the e-meter rise.

Mental masses result from trauma in the subject's past which form engrams, a kind of mental scar. By finding and facing the trauma the subject can blow the charge on the mental mass.

The process of finding the mental masses and blowing the charge is known as auditing and is the main process the e-meter is used for by all practitioners of scientology.

The e-meter helps in this process by detecting the increase in resistance as a mental mass is found and by monitoring the charge on the mental mass as the subject blows it by repeatedly facing it and understanding it.

First the subject is asked to hold a tin can in each hand which is connected to the e-meter. The e-meter passes a small current (2V) through the subject via the tin cans. The operator of the e-meter, known as the auditor, adjusts a knob known as the Tone Arm until the e-meter needle is at the set position on the e-meter's dial.

The subject is then asked to think back to a past trauma; this can have occurred any time since the beginning of the Universe since the meat body is just a vessel for the thetan (the spirit if you will) that has existed forever and it is actually the mental masses of the thetan being addressed.

As the subject finds a trauma the increase in resistance is detected by the e-meter and indicated by a rise in the needle. The auditor adjusts the tone arm knob to bring the needle back to the set position.

The tone arm knob has a scale and the difference between the original position of the tone arm knob and the new position on detecting a mental mass determines the charge on that mental mass.

The subject must then address the trauma. When they address it properly some of the mental mass charge is blown off; a blowdown occurs. This results in a drop in the needle and a re-adjustment of the tone arm to get the needle back to the set position. The difference between the peak position and the new position of the needle determines the charge blown off.

The subject must then approach the trauma again to see if there is any more charge left on the mental mass. If the needle rises again the process is repeated. The process is repeated until the needle no longer moves as the subject address the trauma; this indicates all the charge on the mental mass has been blown, clearing the mental mass.

This is a very intense ritual and having successfully blown a mental mass to pieces the subject experiences some intense emotions resulting in crying, laughing etc.

At the end of a session the auditor adds up all the Tone Arm blowdown differences and divides it by the duration of the session in hours to derive the Tone Arm Action for the session; this is expressed as units of Tone Arm motion per hour.

Auditors have to be very skilled as the job is not as simple as the above explanation suggests. The auditor must monitor the subject's physically manifest condition - blushing, sweating, happy, sullen, expressive, quiet etc. and take this in to account, along with delays in answering (Com lag) when translating the movements of the needle. The e-meter requires great skill to operate effectively and for a session to be effective there needs to be live ARC between auditor and subject.

Practitioners of scientology outside the organisation calling itself the church of scientology find it hard to get hold of e-meters produced by the organisation; the organisation is very protective of what it sees as its propitiatory equipment. Never the less they can be gotten hold of although many independent scientologist auditors use e-meters built independently based on research performed independently and it is believe that this new innovative research has produced a better product that produced by the organisation. Legally the e-meter was only protected by patent which has now expired.

The organisation calling itself the church of scientology also uses the e-meter during what it refers to as sec checks (security checks). Depending on where they work sec checking is a routine part of a staff member's life in the organisation.

Just as the e-meter detects mental mass related to past traumas that need to be addressed so it detects mental mass caused by ill intent and the subject being in one of the lower conditions, such as doubt.

Sec checking is ritualised interrogation. It is performed ostensibly to determine if the subject is suitable for a particular task or role within the organisation or to determine why the subject's performance as dropped off. It can be performed any time as required by an appropriate senior member of staff or Office of Special Affairs member.

During Sec checking the subject is asked a series of questions and the movement of the needle is monitored. Any change in resistance is explored with further questioning. Sec checking may involve questions being asked of the subject by multiple people, a practice known as gang bang sec checking. Questions may be asked without emotion or with intense emotion.

Unlike during auditing where the subject ultimately becomes more relaxed, attaining an improved state of emotion, during sec checking the subject can become incredibly stressed. Sec checking can go on for hours or even days which can result in the subject suffering a break down.

Sec checking is a harmful and abusive use of the e-meter. Anecdotal testimony says that sec checks have been used to mentally break a subject down completely.

Staff members who fail a sec check are usually subject to discipline often in the form of assignment to Rehabilitation Project Force. When assigned to RPF the subject must wear dirty clothes, eat 3rd rate food (rice and beans and scraps), sleep in 3rd rate mass accommodation (or outside) and do long hours of physical and often demeaning and dirty work.

The organisation calling itself the church of scientology always records what is revealed during auditing and sec checks. Both often result in the subject revealing intimate details about their desires and feelings. Such records are meant to be kept private between auditor and subject, just as church confessionals are considered privileged however the organisation observes this privilege as it chooses.

Recently two apostates of the organisaion, Mike Rinder and Marty Rathbone openly accused the organisation of knowingly allowing serious physical abuses to occur. They specifically accused the leader of committing multiple acts of serious assault as well as other verbal and physical abuse.

The organisation immediately started to open up the files they'd kept on these two from their auditing and sec check sessions and revealed the contents to the media. The Catholic church only ever allows confessionals, which are not recorded, to be reported to the appropriate authorities as required by the laws of the land and even then grudgingly - they are never used against the subjects under any other circumstances.

The recording of auditing and sec check sessions and the use of the content by the organisation to exert influence or to attack the subject is an abuse of auditing.

It should be noted that the organisation's spokesperson, Tommy Davis, admitted the organisation had known and by virtue of inaction allowed verbal and extreme physical abuse to occur. Tommy Davis describe the abuses in detail and reported the organisation had witnesses that this abuse had occurred multiple (50+) times over a long period of time. The only thing he contradicted with respect to the reports of Mike Rinder and Marty Rathburn was while they said David Miscavige, the organisations' de facto leader did it Tommy said they'd done it, sometimes to each other.

While auditing is fairly benign it can become quite addictive because of the intensity of feelings experience during and especially just after auditing. Auditing is very expensive, both the organisation and independent auditors charge by the hour for their services; generally the organisation charges a lot more, sometimes $100's an hour. This makes it quite an expensive habit. Some people indulge perhaps too much for their own financial good and within the organisation people are encouraged to do so unless they are staff; staff are meant to receive such services for free.

Auditing may be thought of as harmless however it can result in harmful delusions because it involves uninhibited demands for memories from past lives. Further more no one, not even the auditor, is allowed to question the validity of any memory, so there is no critical evaluation of what is recalled.

The problem with regression as occurs during auditing is that when you demand the brain come up with memories it will eventually find them to satisfy the demand, especially when it is allowed free reign to delve in to past lives.

Mostly these memories are harmless but there are accounts such as the 10 year old who remembered being a Roman tax collector who bashed in people's skulls for the fun of it. As a late teenager this child experienced serious emotional problems resulting from this memory discovered during auditing.

It should be noted that as subjects attain higher levels of understanding within the organisation, known as the OT levels, body thetans are introduced.

Like mental masses body thetans also have charge. Body thetans are other spirits that hang on to the subjects' thetan and inhibit it.

To blow the charge on a body thetan or cluster of body thetans is much more complex than dealing with engrams. Body thetans also have traumas and it is these traumas that cause them to cluster on the subjects thetan. By locating and addressing the body thetan's trauma, running it down, one can cause the body thetan to blow its charge and depart.

The trauma's on the body thetan center around 2 main events known as incident 1 and incident 2. Incident one is essentially the beginning of the known Universe which was created by the thetans. This occurred 4 Quadrillion years ago.

Incident 2 is more complex and involves a period around 75 million years ago. At this time the Universe consisted of a space confederacy ruled over by Overlord Xenu (Xemu). There was a problem of over population and Overlord Xenu decided to solve this by tricking the population in to coming in for tax auditing, where upon he froze them in alcohol and glycol. He did this to prevent the thetans from exteriorising. He shipped the bodies to Teegeak (the name for Earth in those days) in space ships that looked like DC8's. Once there he deposited them in and around volcanoes in Hawaii and Japan and blew them all up with hydrogen bombs. This forced the thetans to exteriorise and Overlord Xenu caught them all in a thetan trap.

If this wasn't traumatic enough he subjected the Thetan's to 30 days of memory implanting in a kind of 3D cinema. The implants included all human history. This confused the thetans so when he let them go they just hung around until eventually humans came along and they started to cluster on them.

Body thetans are removed by identifying and addressing the traumas from incident 1 and 2. A subject will have thousands of body thetans on them and these can occur in clusters too.
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
31 months ago: The article states outright that it speaks for everyone who has ever used an E-meter.

"What follows is their understanding of how it works", says DeanFox.

Rather, I would say that DeanFox' article states what he understands the E-meter to do. But not what everyone else understands about E-meter operation.
An Observer
An Observer
Garrettsville, OH
31 months ago: The sad part about this whole situation is, most Scientologists have no idea Hubbard turned a 1940s party gag he saw advertised in a science fiction magazine into a religious artifact called an "E-Meter which he sells to his followers for thousands of dollars

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Secrets/E-Meter/lie-detector1.jpg

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Secrets/E-Meter/lie-detector2.jpg

And to make matters worse, Hubbard even lost a lawsuit for stealing this device from it's creator.


http://www.kristi-wachter.com/aberree/v01/n04/page0017.png
skeptic
skeptic
Canada
31 months ago: When I have a lot of things to say, I sometimes type too quickly and make needless typographical errors, so it is with complete understanding that I would like to point out that Marty Rathbun's name is misspelled in the above article in two different ways, as Rathbone and Rathburn. You can re-edit this when you eventually include the article in your book.

I have used e-meters and I find them to be interesting devices, but I would advise against over-estimating their reliability. To some extent, reading an e-meter is like reading tea leaves; you can read what you want into ambiguous patterns. For example, a floating needle is a very good indicator (i.e., the person being metered is doing very well) except when it isn't, in which case, although it looks exactly the same, we call it an ARC break needle, and it becomes a bad indicator. When the needle twitches, the auditor must infer what that means. In theory, successful use of an e-meter is all about the auditor's precise technique (or as it would be called in Scientologese, keeping your TRs in) but in practice, people draw the conclusions that they want to draw. Even so, I think that the e-meter, an invention expropriated by L. Ron Hubbard from its actual inventor, Volney Matheson, and falsely renamed the Hubbard electrometer, remains the most intriguing aspect of Scientology. It is probably the one trick which has give Scientology whatever sense of credibility it still has. But it is not enough.
DeanFox
DeanFox
England
31 months ago: Thanks Skeptic, you remain as always a good proof reader. :-) I also agree with your assessment of the e-meter. This is not my assessment of the e-meter, which I will explain for the benefit of Terryeo, who has responded exactly as expected again.
DeanFox
DeanFox
England
31 months ago: Terryeo, I understand what you're saying, of course this is my understanding how can it be otherwise? I state that it is "their understanding" but it is implicit that any statement I make is one of my understanding; to state this would be stating the obvious.

I also understand that you are not invalidating my understanding by stating the obvious fact that this is my understanding. Given your propensity (fav word atm) for pointing out real fallacies I thank you for recognising that my understanding is valid.

Just to state the obvious in case some others are confused, this is my understanding of the understanding that practitioners of scientology have with respect to the e-meter and how it works. It is a general understanding and individual understandings may vary slightly.

It is also my understanding of how the organisation calling itself the church of scientology abuses the e-meter when performing sec checks as well as how it abuses confidences in the way no other professional body would do, like doctors and priests.

Lastly it is my understanding of how members of the organisation who studied beyond OT 3 on the bridge use the e-meter.
31 months ago: Hmmm. One point I'm going to make about the E-meter. If it measures current, it will not be rated in Volts (2V). It will be rated in Amperes, Amps, A.

Now as for its swinging needle, there are so many different variables that can cause the needle to move up or down and none of them have to do with mental masses. Sweaty or dry palms, loose or tight grip, total area of skin in contact, composition of a persons blood (which varies over time) and I don't know how many more others can list, these are just a few that come to mind.

I am a skeptic as to the true cause of E-meter variances and results achieved from use of "auditing". To me it is just a different form of miracle cure, instead of being peddled from the back of a brightly painted wagon; it is peddled from tax exempt buildings and offices.

Really odd part is that there is no attempt to verify the memories, even if they are from the present.

As for the physical and mental abuse members are subjected to, they made the choice to join this “church”, and although I think it is wrong to abuse children, other churches do some of the same things and no one is trying to stop them, at least not until it becomes sexual.
DeanFox
DeanFox
England
31 months ago: Current = Amps, yep I fail basic physics (doh, I know this and didn't write it) - hopefully you get the drift.

I agree with rest of your comments Sixholdens, thanks for commenting by the way, this was my explanation of their "understanding" of what the e-meter does and how it works, not actually my understanding of what it does and how it works.

Last paragraph - I agree abuse is wrong, even when the abused practically bends over and asks for it. Scientology gets special attention for various reasons but this does not mean no one is trying to stop other churches committing abuses.

There are a number of groups trying to address such abuses which I support. Unfortunately they get less publicity and like you say most people tend not to see abuse unless it's sexual. Faith healers tend to be an abusive bunch but abuses also occur in many "main stream" religious groups too. Some successes have been had in recent years but still a lot to do, it's all about education in the long term though.

Sometimes religious order abuse is institutionalised owing to fundamental moral flaws in the doctrines or leadership but most "main stream" groups these days its just people being people in large organised groups (similar dynamics result in "office politics" for instance).

Scientology is a special case because it has by far the most institutionalised abuse thanks to its doctrines and leadership. Further more the abuses extend outside the confines of the group. It's kinda similar to the problematic religious orders of old that went around sanctioning torture and murder, wrong then and wrong now.
31 months ago: DeanFox - "I also understand that you are not invalidating my understanding by stating the obvious fact that this is my understanding". No, I don't intend to invalidate. At times I will disagree.

Siholdens - "If it measures current, it will not be rated in Volts (2V). It will be rated in Amperes, Amps, A." Quantity of electrical energy passing a given point in space (usually within a wire) is measured in Amperes. But neither a Lie Detector or an E-Meter, interests itself in Amperes. The indicators are deflected and read out quantity of energy passing through wire, but the read outs are not read out as Amperes. The readouts are interested in the amount of change. With the E-Meter the amount of change is called "divisions of change" which is the markings on the meter. Think of a big mental mass causing a big change and a small mental mass causing a small change, perhaps.

A similarity of Dianetics and Scientology is the E-Meter, but, Dianetics was practiced before the E-Meter was developed. A "mental mass" (what we are calling it) was called into play during a Dianetics auditing session. The guy's appearance would change slightly. You have seen the same reaction when a friend talks about a past loss, or perhaps about a time of grief. His appearance changes slightly. Dianetics looked for changes in skin tone and even eye clarity when it didn't have an E-Meter as a guide. An E-Meter has proven by use, to be a more reliable indicator. Still, it serves no use except to detect changes in how a person is feeling. And it does that by monitoring skin resistance. This may sound far-fetched, improbable. But the Lie Detector does similar and use has shown such indication to be reliable.

I don't agree with you guys' "institutional abuse" nonsense. heh.
Frederick
Frederick
Canada
31 months ago: Thanks for the comments on electricity Terryeo.

Terryeo, I want you to know this. A very recent person who was imployed by Scientology to do something very similar to what you do was Tory Christman. She signed her posts as Magoo. After a while she realized that the critics, the suppressives, were mostly right. In your terms, she was inturbulated by the suppressives. She then left the cult and the cult dead-agented her. Overnight she went from trusted member to suppressive person. She left her friends of thirty years and her family. Today she protests the church.

I have no idea if you are employed by the cult to support it on the internet, of if you do this simply for the love of Scientology. Either way you often make very little sense. You refuse to confront serious issues. As I said before, you serve to innoculate readers against Scientology.

Tory Christman said that some of the critics, particularly Andreas Hendal, continued to treat her with respect, even though she had created a persona that really didn't deserve it. Imagine the courage it took to turn her back on thirty years of indoctrination and admit that what she was doing was foolish and harmful. I don't think you will come around the way she did, but there is a chance.
31 months ago: "I don't agree with you guys' "institutional abuse" nonsense. heh."

Where's your data to support this decision? Are you arbitrarily choosing to disagree with previous statements simply to disagree, or do you have data to back up your decision? Little children disagree simply to disagree. Adults have reasons.
31 months ago: Terryeo, It really doesn't matter what the divisions are marked in or labeled that indicate quantity, the meter won't indicate without the flow of current, no matter how small. The amount of current is determined by the difference in quantity of charge measured in coulombs between two points. Please don't try to explain electrical theory to someone who spent the majority of his life studying and working in the electrical/electronic industry, hands on.

As for your “mental mass”, that’s just bull. The constant readjusting of the calibration completely nullifies any readings that you might make to determine if a person has a “blockage”. You have to do a baseline reading and from there you are not allowed to change the calibration of the machine to determine if there is a change in the electrical conductivity of the object under test. The constant re-adjustment you cultist do is to make the machine conform to the physiological changes of the body under test, these changes are the direct result of the verbal and physical abuse you are applying to the person you are “auditing”, nothing unusual in that.

As for comparing your E-meter to a lie detector, sorry, won’t fly, considerably more sophisticated. I’m not one to put a lot of faith in the lie detectors results, much too easy to fool, but it is by far a better device for determining a persons physiological responses than yours, especially since they only calibrate it once per session.

Strange how you feel it is not abuse to verbally, mentally and physically abuse children and fellow church members. There are many who will disagree with you if they apply the same degree of scrutiny toward your church and how we treat the suspected terrorists in Guantanamo.
31 months ago: There are many levels and ways of abusing a fellow human being. Many of those ways do not require any physical contact. From what I’ve read about your churches/cults methods, it goes beyond the normal and verges on the extreme, you must remember, it is not what you think about it that matters, it is what others think.

I’ll give you an example. I believe in spanking children when they misbehave, others do not, they think it is physical abuse. Their method of correction is to punish them verbally or by deprivation of something they enjoy. Whose method works best? Which is more abusive? Hard to say. I will say that mine is quick, decisive and effective. I have four very well adjusted children who respect their elders and other people close to their ages and others property. What I’ve observed of other peoples children who do not spank is that they are mentally whipped, they cringe when spoken to and they are devious in that they hide what they are doing, good or bad. My observations are of many different families, not just one or two, so please don’t try to pass it off as a one time thing. Many have had success with the no spank method, but for me it doesn’t pass the “spare the rod, spoil the child” test, spoil being a multi faceted term, not just the brat definition.
31 months ago: Sixholdens, listen buddy, we have all agreed that current is the activating force, changes in current causes changes in current monitors. Meter needles, charted readouts, etc. We have all agreed about that. Volts is a measure of potential force, while Amperes is a measure of force in action.

So, we have agreed that changing meter needles are caused by changes in current, and we have agreed that current is measured in Amperes. Nothing unusual yet, huh?

Now, let us say for a microsecond, that we have a meter and a changing needle. Our needle moves all the way across our meter and back again. What do we call that full scale deflection? You suggest "Amperes" and some meters are labeled in divisions of amperes. But since we are creating a meter, we can call that full scale deflection anything we want to. Elephants, cookies, Ohms, Volts or "divisions". I pointed out that the E-meter is marked, but not in amperes. Yes, the needle continues to deflect because of changes in current. The amount of amperes flowing through the coil that causes the needle (indicator) to move, changes.

And what changes? Skin resistance changes. Why? The "why" is our unagreed upon point of information. But no matter what we agree or disagree on, Skin resistance was long ago, and is still called "galvanic skin response".
DeanFox
DeanFox
England
31 months ago: Terryeo: "but at times I will disagree." but not this time eh? You haven't done so far because you know that to do so you would have to fabricate an outright lie. You find this awkward, it's unethical.

Instead you play with "acceptable truths" as taught by L Ron Hubbard:

"sometimes I will disagree",

"...I would say that DeanFox's article states what he understands the E-meter to do. But not what everyone else understands about E-meter operation."

These are acceptable truths. They don't call me out on any points. You know that to attempt to do so would reveal your understanding which would demonstrate that I do understand your understanding. You can only call me out now by an outright lie which you risk me publicly shredding by using over 30 years of understanding your organisation and its adherents.
DeanFox
DeanFox
England
31 months ago: You said I did not understand what your organisation teaches with respect to the e-meter, what it does, how it works and how it is used according to the understanding of members of your organisation and other practitioners of the beliefs of scientology. This demonstrates that statement to be incorrect, a misunderstanding of me you might say.

You see Terryeo, I understand the understanding of the world taught by the organisation calling itself the church of scientology, such as has been taught to you.

You however demonstrate a complete failure to understand critics of the organisation calling itself the church of scientology.
DeanFox
DeanFox
England
31 months ago: Terryeo: your answer to sixholdens lacks substance although it demonstrates you did a bit of physics homework, good for you - I really should be careful when using technical terms like "current".

Galvanic skin response - correct. Erm yes.

Why? The "why" is our unagreed upon point of information. - stating the obvious again terryeo, if there was no disagreement there would be no discussion. Everyone knows this, it's implicit in the discussions.

I'm fairly sure sixholdens would agree that discussion of the finer nuances of physics, quantum physics even, would not dissuade you of your belief as to why the needle moves. It only serves to gain greater understanding of your understanding.

What you believe isn't an issue for me. My issue was simply to address your assertion that I did not understand what your organisation teaches with respect to the e-meter.
DeanFox
DeanFox
England
31 months ago: Siempre Solo, nice to see you here. You're right not to trust pseudo religious technology. Although it's great to be able to trust, trust is something best reserved; but you know that.

I should point out that "institutionalised abuse" also occurs in non religious organisations and most religious organisations do NOT have "institutionalised abuse". Abuses can and do occur within religious and non religious organisations but most is localised.

Institutionalised abuse requires the right environment to occur. I feel another rant coming on to explain this, but for another day.
31 months ago: What kind of reaction can I expect from you, Siempre Solo? I would prefer to think you are capable of stating opinion that you formed yourself.

As compared to stating an emotional reaction, an emotional reaction based on reading other people's emotional emotion. In the first instance, you find out what is prompting emotional reaction. In the second instance you simply mirror emotional reaction.

Some history is formed by people jumping on an emotional bandwagon. Other history is formed by people first reasoning, then forming opinion, and then directing effort and emotion.

In the main, democracy was formed because many people liked the potential freedom of creating their own government.
DeanFox
DeanFox
England
31 months ago: Terryeo: I won't presume to answer for Siempre Solo but regardless of what an opinion is based on it is surely one's own; if someone's opinion is based on an "emotional reaction" it is still their opinion.

That aside I understand where you're going with this argument. You believe critics of your organisation are jumping on an emotional band wagon; you believe this behaviour is a problem in society, not just with respect to the prevalent opinion of your organisation. Further you believe your opinions, including the one you have that your organisation is a force for good, is formed based on an objective assessment. You're wrong and I thank you for giving me another basis for a rant that will explain why this is the case. Tomorrow though.
31 months ago: Terryeo, you are very good at making incoherent babbling noises.

Now where in your post was I able to find an argument, or coherent thought that made sense or was relevent.

Please go back to high school and re-take english 101.

Thank You.
31 months ago: Anonymous is a Scientology publicity stunt
check it out here -http://jwmadison.wordpress.com/2009/07/18/anonymous/
30 months ago: I'm very worried about TerryEO, Jack Remington, and GaryDM. I sincerly hope they are alright and have not been placed on RPF, forced to undergo any additional Purification Rundowns, or coercive auditing sec checks. Their lack of presence in recent days has me concerned about their welfare.
lucek
lucek
Quincy, MA
30 months ago: there is nothing supernatural about galvanic skin response. in a properly adjusted device the change in the needle is a result of the flight or fight response from the brain. further there is a perfectly reasonable reason for why you lose a response over time. show a person a scary or grotesque image and they'll have a large emotional reaction, show them again and they'll have a lesser one. this is basic desensitization.
"In psychology, desensitization (also called inurement) is a process for mitigating the harmful effects of phobias or other disorders. It also occurs when an emotional response is repeatedly evoked in situations in which the action tendency that is associated with the emotion proves irrelevant or unnecessary."

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.