Economy

Rant

Reality Check on the State of World Economics Part 2

Posted 9 months ago|20 comments|276 views
Written by
Colorado
Westcliffe, CO
Part 2: The Middle East

The Middle East goes through periods of tranquility and periods of rage. The Middle East is bearing witness to governments toppled by uprisings of the general population and the Western World hopes for a new age of liberty in the troubled region. Such Optimism lacks perspective. Periods of tranquility are not truly peaceful but rather the military suppresses discontent through military dictatorships funded by oil sales to the Western World.

Liberty based societies supporting dictatorships is a contradiction to the ideals of personal liberty. The reason Western populations support such suppressions is that volatility in world economies shakes the confidence of capitalist consumers. The oil in the Middle East is the main reason that the Western World does not support democracy since the transition to a republic is an unpredictable process. In military power the Western World finds reliability and the ability to calm a region, at least it looks serene on the surface.

A regime that forces silence will always be subject to revolt periodically by citizens straining for liberty but without the full support of democratic nations abroad, democratic movements stand almost no chance for success. Instead opposing political parties utilize the revolts towards personal power acquisition and try to topple a regime and take control in a similar fashion. In Egypt, the military was in control the entire time and it redirected public anger towards Mubarak and away from itself. The removal of Mubarak by the citizens allows the military to slowly re-assert its power on the nation. Nothing changed for the citizens of Egypt and the Western World continues to support the military in favor of perceived stability over personal liberty.

The United States decided to experiment with direct military stability by invading Iraq for reasons that are less than opaque. The result was complete civil war for a short duration than replaced by an oppressive military occupation. The Iraqi government is far from being a true democracy and the citizens of the nation have not gained a morsel of additional personal liberty. Once the United States removes its military completely political agents from Iran and Saudi Arabia will battle for control over Iraq's oil and the Western World will be satisfied if this means no visible volatility.

Citizens of Western nations care little for others' personal liberty regardless of the rhetoric there're elected representatives spew. In fact, few citizens of republics truly understand the concept of a society cultured in the belief that personal liberty should be held above all other ideals including that of religion. For example, the majority of United States population has never read the Constitution, Common Sense, Articles of Confederacy, The Federalist Papers, or the other works that defined the United States as the first society dedicated to liberty regardless of its flaws. These works recorded the struggle of defining not only personal liberty but also the role of government to protect and enforce liberty.

Systems of government will never be perfect but the pursuit of perfection by a liberty based society will create a superior system of political economy than any other governing process in the world. So until the Western World defines what liberty means for itself, the citizens of the democratic nations will continue to support oppressive regimes across the globe in the name of stability. The "Arab Spring" died before it began and even if governments fall they will be replace by power hungry political parties that will lie and oppress again with the blessing of our Western governments.
UPDATE - 9 months ago
I Encourage everyone to read the article from the link below. I subscribe to the site myself but this is one of thier free articles and it captures perfectly what my post was about. The difference is the George Friedman is a much better writter than myself. Let me know if the link does not work.


"Re-Examining the Arab Spring is republished with permission of STRATFOR."


Read more: Re-Examining the Arab Spring | STRATFOR
Re-Examining the Arab Spring is republished with permission of STRATFOR.
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
9 months ago: Watch How your views go up after 7:00 when I send a "Know your enemy" tweet. It is good that your so "all knowing" about such things from your own"boots on the ground" experience. Or, is this more like I read it in a liberal publication or grabbed it from Media Matters? Mr. Discount Wall Street Broker. What a two faced piece of....
Colorado
Colorado
Westcliffe, CO
9 months ago: 1. I do not "tweet" or read tweets (though I have tried to several times to use twitter).

2. The timing of the posting is dictated by when I have a chance to review my work and post it.

3. I did not get into supporting or attacking either political party. Just a different view of events in the Middle East.

4. I talk to hundreds of people a day and alot sound just like you, running thier mouths without understanding the words spewing from it, from BOTH political parties.
9 months ago: 12 views and click
Colorado
Colorado
Westcliffe, CO
9 months ago: what are you talking about, I am at a total loss.
9 months ago: We already know that.
Colorado
Colorado
Westcliffe, CO
9 months ago: Did you even read either post?
9 months ago: Did you write them?
Colorado
Colorado
Westcliffe, CO
9 months ago: Yes I did. The whole point of posting them is to get quility feedback from a diversfied background of people to not only learn from mistakes but to understand the opinions of others plus give readers a point of view they may have not considered.

I still do not know what I did to offened by posting these articles.
9 months ago: During the current state of affairs? I suggest you lay off any posts that state the U.S. is the guilty party in world turmoil. Of course. You will say you didn't. Try reading them from a perspective other than your own.

Put a turban on your head and read them. Who would you think was at fault?
Colorado
Colorado
Westcliffe, CO
9 months ago: On the contrary, I fully believe that the United States, Europe, and Middle East nations are all part of what makes the Middle East a unsettling place. There is no one cause but if people think for one second that democracy is going to suddenly appear in the region they are mistaken. Why, because they have a tribal system and Western governments will support whom ever they think will win, the military dictatorships.

Lets look at Iran. Since 1900 they have had three attempts at creating a republic. The british crushed one, the Russins another, and lastly the US which backfired and created a Republic that is now very extreme and resentful that a republic such as ours used the CIA to create a military coup to topple the newly ELECTED pariliment in Iran. Now Iran is extremeist which is in part thier own failing. But the United States has fallen very far short of becoming the "shinning city on the hill."

Thats just one example of the many factors that have led to the unrest in the middle east. So if I was an Egyptian and put a "turban" on my head (thanks for sterotyping over 10 cultures into one ignorant statement.) and read this post I would be very upset that I had stated their revolt agains Mumbarik ment nothing.

I fully understand that you think reading and learning makes me an elitist but there is also a point that you need to be able to read to take part in a discussion...
9 months ago: US efforts "Backfired" in Iran?

Like electing Obama number 1? Jimmy Carter?

For crying out loud. Another liberal screw up.

9 months ago: he he he he he......
9 months ago: No kidding RED. Me thinks the writer is a freaking liberal disguised as an INDEPENDENT. Funny how that works out during primary voting.
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
9 months ago: Good Post Colorado but I am not quite as cynical as you. Yes the Western powers have manipulated the middle East for their oil. Read how Kermit Roosevelt (US CIA) just about single handedly overthrew the democratically elected government of Iran in 1953 so what was to become BP could get their oil. This is the root of most of the hatred and terrorism against America. http://www.rense.com/general40/roots.htm

But we are not always successful in preventing what the people want. We went into Vietnam in 1954 to prevent the unification of the country and free elections because the CIA found that 85% of the people would vote for Ho Chi Minh, but after 20 years and 3 million lives the people won. There is a limit to how long military force can suppress freedom.

You are correct that the Arab Spring has not resulted in a democracy yet in Egypt, and that the military is still in control there, but the revolution is not over yet. The people are still struggling for their freedom. Change takes time.

The major powers are no longer colonial. That gave way to imperialism through force, but that too has run it's course and now China is practicing "Soft Imperialism" by actually helping nations while they steal/buy their resources. (Don't know why they need that air craft carrier though).

The solution to the imperialism through military force is the cooperation of nations with a strengthened UN.

The people are still struggling in Egypt and the incredibly brave people in Syria are still protesting even though the brutal government is slaughtering them.

There is one shining success to Arab Spring. Morocco. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joel-d-hir...

Just as Tunisia served as an inspiration for Egypt's revolution, Morocco may serve as an example of a successful Arab democracy with a liberal constitution that actually protects the people. This may serve as an example for Egypt, and if that is successful, for the rest of the middle East.

Colorado
Colorado
Westcliffe, CO
9 months ago: I agree with what you have said, I just wish that Western Nations could provide example of liberty and help these nations when the time comes. I have hope, but only if the US leads by example and stops trying protect dictatrosips.

Vietnam is a great example but the cost for Vietnam was extreme.

Thanks for the great feedback.
Felix Mannow
Felix Mannow
England
9 months ago: Let me point out that the middle easts was f*cked ups place long before the wests became involved.
Middle east has alway been a hotbed of violence all through historys.
I point out middle east was better relation and then obama took over and it gone haywire.
When mr bush in charge everyone talking and peace was starting to achieve and even iran sometime sat round tables.
now nobody sits round tables and big wars starting but to blame west is wrong for state of middle east.
Sunny see i do stick up for wests sometime.
Felix Mannow
Felix Mannow
England
9 months ago: i find some of thing you write disrespect mr colorado.
my english not great but i start reading mr men book and learn so there is nothing elite about you.you are no better than anyones else and to think you are will be your downfalls.
to have knowledge can be a gift but in the wrong hands it can be a sin.
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
9 months ago: I am glad that we kept a hands off attitude with Egypt, our intrusion would have condemned any chance of reform. Our attacks in Libya are having mixed results, but I am glad we are not openly moving forces in there and that we have a coalition NATO instead of going in alone.

Governments have evolved in how they dominate others. Now the US doesn't use so much direct force any more. We use military aid to buy allies even if the leaders are scumbags. We need their resources and we need them to help in the anti terrorist efforts.

The reality is that while we often get a bad rap for pursuing imperialist aims, it is in reality the international corporations that dominate and control other nations and conflicts, as Chacuita did with US in South America. In the past corporations got nations and their military to overthrow governments, declare war and enforce contracts. Now they can hire their own mercenary army like Blackwater (Xe).

Mansanto now owns Blackwater and no doubt will use them to help them destroy local agriculture and to push Genetically modified crops. http://beforeitsnews.com/story/215/350/M...
9 months ago: Hands off? Didn't your buddy Obama "Own" the Arab Spring as his own?
Yeah, hands off.
9 months ago: Maybe Blackwater has stolen your picture from rantrave.com......

uh oh........

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.