Culture & Lifestyle

Rant

Rant/Rave Censors Scientology Postings

Posted 33 months ago|23 comments|769 views
Written by
Louanne
Los Angeles, CA
This morning I had posted the below message on Rant/Rave. It was taken down without notice nor reason. An obvious case of censorship. No wonder there are so much trash and troll posts on this site.

Here is what I posted (with a link to the source):

Scientology members on YouTube

The Church of Scientology International is launching a series of testimonial videos on its official YouTube Channel called "Meet a Scientologist," which showcase the lives and careers of everyday Scientologists. YouTube users will be able to view 50 videos to start, with 100 more videos scheduled to follow in the upcoming months as part of the Church's continuing efforts to expand its presence in the world's largest online video community.

Meet A Scientologist YouTube Videos

The "Meet a Scientologist" videos, which were shot on location, focus on individual Scientologists who explain how the religion has helped them, whether by teaching effective communication skills, learning to be confident in their abilities, or generally improving their life. Videos highlight members of Scientology from all over the world and all kinds of professions, including doctors, educators, inventors, athletes, actors, musicians, students, photographers, business owners and more.

These new videos are based on one of the core principles of the Scientology religion. L. Ron Hubbard, founder of the Church of Scientology, discovered that understanding is composed of affinity, reality and communication. With the conviction that this applies to any aspect of life, the Church of Scientology seeks to increase understanding of Scientology and Scientologists by applying this principle to online video, while at the same time, providing information through personal stories.

A pioneer and leader in the online religious community, the Church of Scientology was the first religion to create its own official YouTube Video Channel in April 2008, with 82 broadcast-quality videos comprising nearly three hours of content in a unique video player. To date, it has been seen by over 2 million visitors. The Church of Scientology has also launched an online public information campaign with 30 and 60-second flash presentation conveying the essence of Scientology. These spots address the most fundamental questions people ask about life--questions for which Scientology has effective answers.

To watch the new "Meet a Scientologist" videos, visit the Scientology Video Channel on YouTube at video channel at http://www.youtube.com/ChurchofScientology.
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
33 months ago: And that would be because it's spam, and was flagged as spam. As this re-post will be flagged as spam.
Alex Layton
Alex Layton
 Administrator
Puyallup, WA
33 months ago: Actually, I did contact you, stating you were in violation of our "Terms of Use." Specifically...

"You may only use Content to which You have the necessary rights, including (but not limited to) intellectual property rights regarding copyright, trademark, and trade secrets. You must have permission to use third party content from the content owners."

Your post an article fully written by someone else. You didn't even bother inserting your own opinion.

This has nothing to do with Scientology. I have deleted rants on a wide variety of topics, all because they were flat out plagiarism.
33 months ago: Louanne,

You need to chill. RantRave is not your private publication forum. It has rules. Which by the way I have broken and have had stuff removed. Your crocodile tears need to go elsewhere. Move on. I suggest FOX NEWS. I wonder how much of your dung would be posted on FOX. Please do us all a favor and stare at the Sun for a few hours. After staring at the Sunfor a few hours find a good source that can get you into the restricted airport areas and stand behind the jets while ramping up for a few hours. That way we can document that your not only blind, but also deaf.

Then contact the White House for ObamaCare.

Sorry, Alex.


Chris D
Chris D
Seattle, WA
33 months ago: HeyNoniNoni noted on another Rave that Louanne (or someone else using that name) was Internet-famous -- she got Scientology IP addresses banned from Wikipedia. Here's some info on the Wikipedia/Scientology edit war -- http://tinyurl.com/n979ul.

The website purporting to be written by "Louanne" has quite a few unintentionally funny nuggets:

"Scientology is not teaching or applying processes which leaves people dead in the end..."

Really? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_McPherson)

I don't think of myself as an active anti-Scientologist, but reading through the history of the CoS is scary.
Mark Tomles
Mark Tomles
FPO, AE
33 months ago: "Rant/Rave Censors Scientology Postings"
The title might be slightly inflammatory. Plenty of scientology postings have been allowed, just not the ones that violate the ToS. That's okay, I've been there ;)
33 months ago: Markus. Please read the rant text. It has nothing to do with a title. Louannes rantrave that was deleted by admin was out of the TOS bounderies. Did you see the deleted post? I'm sure the admin did. So your accusing the rantrave admin of selective deletion?
33 months ago: Don't write off Scientology just because an anonymous person claiming to be 'Louanne' and who claims to be a 'real' Scientologist acts in a certain way and puts herself in a bad light. Someone calling herself Louanne has been racing around the internet comment-spamming to the effect that no-one should listen to me with the implication that she's a real Scientologist, and I'm not, like she has the right to determine that. Is this 'Louanne' an official representative of Scientology's views? She can act like it, but I doubt it. What's more, someone calling herself "Louanne" is comment spamming that "Rant/Rave is the p*** pot of the internet". Not to mention comment spamming just about every one of my posts with "Troll" comments. If she doesn't have anything constructive to say, that's her look out. People can judge her on it.

Rant/Rave is very fair. It's run by good people (that I don't always agree with, for sure!) I've had articles deleted. That's the umpire's decision. Fair enough, I stepped over the line. I don't have some special entitlement. But I have put in the hard yards of writing them myself, and people like reading them, I think, no matter where they stand on the issues. They're just my opinion. No one has to agree with them.
Chris D
Chris D
Seattle, WA
33 months ago: ...and Jack knocks it out of the park.
Mark Tomles
Mark Tomles
FPO, AE
33 months ago: "Markus. Please read the rant text. It has nothing to do with a title. Louannes rantrave that was deleted by admin was out of the TOS bounderies. Did you see the deleted post? I'm sure the admin did. So your accusing the rantrave admin of selective deletion?"

No, you misunderstand, but I can see how I was unclear.

Louanne named her second posting "Rant/Rave Censors Scientology Postings". That was a title she chose, implying that Rant/Rave was engaging in censorship over scientology postings. My point was that multiple scientology postings have been allowed, as long as they didn't violate the ToS, which hers did.
Some of my posts were deleted off of her personal blog, so I could sympathize.
Louanne
Louanne
Los Angeles, CA
33 months ago: Mark,

I got your posts on email but I can't find them in the system. Is that what you mean by "Some of my posts were deleted off of her personal blog, so I could sympathize."?

-L
Mark Tomles
Mark Tomles
FPO, AE
33 months ago: No, Louanne. I'm referring to your scientologymyths forum. It was a subtle wink/nod laugh for you and I.
Louanne
Louanne
Los Angeles, CA
33 months ago: Oh, that. Too subtle for me, heh.

- Louanne
Frederick
Frederick
Canada
33 months ago: I think a better name for the videos would be, "Meat, a Scientologist".

For people who claim to care about the spirit, it sure seems important to you to put your best looking people up front. The hometown Scientologists don't look nearly as good as the ones in the videos.
Mark Tomles
Mark Tomles
FPO, AE
33 months ago: "Oh, that. Too subtle for me, heh."
well, it was a little esoteric, I suppose :)
THE RONBOT HUNTER
THE RONBOT HUNTER
33 months ago: The Cult does have a right to put its best Ronbots on display for the world to see. But meet them on the street and you will learn their true mind-control conditioning and you will see the RONBOT come-out in your face. It is scary to see a once normal human being so infested with "conditioning" that all he can do is talk policy and never a real conversation with WOGS or the public.
Yes by all means meet a real scientologist but in person, away from their ethics officer and see the REAL Scientologists and not these COWARDLY wimps.
I pity the cult for this desperate attempt to save itself.
THE RONBOT HUNTER
All Rights Reserved

33 months ago: I find this to be an abuse of the website by utilizing it as a propaganda machine for press releases. Certainly the purpose of this site is the exchange of information and debate. You can't debate a press release.

Also, totally copy and pasted from another source. Not original material written by the claimant, Louanne. That's fraud. So much for ethics.
DeanFox
DeanFox
England
33 months ago: Louanne gets caught posting copy / pasta and then makes it public by posting this, well that's a foot bullet. Better yet, it gets top rant.
33 months ago: Hubbard was a funny guy. Anyone wanting a good laugh should listen to some of his "lectures" youtube is full of them.
Especially the ramblings on the Fifth Invader Force. Even better than the stuff on South Park. Which is when I started looking this stuff up, that and the famous Tom Cruise wackiness.
Scary that people fall for this.
33 months ago: Maybe it's me, but I find Scientology quite boring. I don't get it.

I don't see any excitement or juice, but it does seem to generate quite lot of interest on this site. Oh, well...
33 months ago: Of all the nonsense here, I'm most amused by Frederick's, misevaluation: "Meat, a Scientologist".

Why don't we just boil this entire back and forth down into two camps.

Those who know beyond any shadow of doubt that man is meat.

Those who consider it might be possible that people are something a little more than their physical body alone.

They we could make up a nice scoreboard, do you see? Meats 49, Meets 118. Or similar.
Mark Tomles
Mark Tomles
FPO, AE
33 months ago: Terryeo- you may have misunderstood his point. He's not making a judgment as to the spiritual nature of man, he was referencing the apparent attempt to present only attractive, well-rested members (or actors?) as scientologists. As it beefcake, if you will.
Mark Tomles
Mark Tomles
FPO, AE
33 months ago: Correction: "as in"
33 months ago: BAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.