News & Politics

Rant

Planned Parenthood Impersonation: Southern Baptist Minister

Posted 6 months ago|42 comments|491 views
Anti-life Activist Vincent Lachina
VIDEOS
Written by
"...the Vincent Lachina standing at the podium in TUPELO, Miss. was actually Vincent Lachina from Seattle, a homosexual activist and chaplain for Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest abortion provider... While Lachina claimed in Tupelo to be an ordained Southern Baptist minister, the deleted Planned Parenthood webpage dug up by Schmidt revealed that, "He is now aligned with the more progressive American Baptist Conference and Church of Christ."
http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?id=3650...%29

Was Lachina a Planned Parenthood "plant" or homosexual activist with an Anti-life Alter-ego? We know for certain he is definitely not who he claimed to be... leaving many wondering if Planned Parenthood has stooped to planting phony clergy at speaking engagements to sway votes on Initiative 26 (on Nov. 8 statewide general election ballot).

Could this be retaliation for the successful exposing of Planned Parenthood by undercover pro-lifers like Lila Rose and former Planned Parenthood director Abby Johnson? What ever it is, it is obvious that the heat has been turned up since Anti-life Planned Parenthood had some of their funding turned down!


UPDATE - 2 months ago
The complete Free Online PDF Book download... "Don't waste your life"
http://dwynrhh6bluza.cloudfront.net/reso...
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
6 months ago: Holy Moly! Or, is it Holy Abortion?
6 months ago: " leaving many wondering if Planned Parenthood has stooped to planting phony clergy at speaking engagements to sway votes "

Wouldn't surprise me at all. Those scuzz bags are capable of anything.
6 months ago: Is it just me or does he look like the model for the OccuPIE (Fawkes) mask?
6 months ago: Yeah... darken the hair... Who knew?
Perfect Horizon
Perfect Horizon
Chicago, IL
6 months ago: Mississippi has rejected the personhood act. I for one am pretty shocked that it failed in a state like Mississippi, I doubt it will pass anywhere now.

As for this guy, are you really so desperate that you will attack anybody who doesn't agree with your particular dogmatic, oppressive religious views? I just don't get why you religious people cannot understand the concept that IT IS NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS what people do with their bodies.

http://tinyurl.com/bpzx8q8
Perfect Horizon
Perfect Horizon
Chicago, IL
6 months ago: When you read the link you can replace "homosexuality" and "heterosexuality" with the words "Pro-Choice" and "Pro-Life"
6 months ago: PH,

I guess we are equally stumped at... why you "non-religious" people cannot understand the concept that IT IS EVERYONE'S BUSINESS what people do with SOMEONE ELSE'S body (the unborn child).
Perfect Horizon
Perfect Horizon
Chicago, IL
6 months ago: What you seem to not understand is that abortion is legal. The argument comes down to when life begins, which the opinion differs on and since you cannot PROVE that your opinion is right there is no way to reconcile the argument.

Further, any attempt to make abortion illegal has been based out of religious arguments of morality...these arguments for making/changing laws are unConstitutional. You are have no right to govern based on YOUR religious view. If a state wants to pass a law making abortion illegal then that is fine...(didn't work very well since Mississippi couldn't even pass it and the state is 95% bible thumping right wing whackjobs). At a federal level you have no say...if you don't like abortion then don't get one.
6 months ago: PH -

"any attempt to make abortion illegal has been based out of religious arguments of morality."

Accodring to your statement the only moral people are religious? Thanks fot that.

"If a state wants to pass a law making abortion illegal then that is fine."

So it does not matter what reality is? It does not matter what is right or wrong? The only thing that matters is what the government says or mandates?

Wow.

I can't get to that. Never will either.
Perfect Horizon
Perfect Horizon
Chicago, IL
6 months ago: "Accodring to your statement the only moral people are religious? Thanks fot that."

~where do I say that only the religious are moral? I said that they are making arguments based on their picture of morality which is based in their religion.

"So it does not matter what reality is? It does not matter what is right or wrong? The only thing that matters is what the government says or mandates?"

~Right or wrong is not determined by you. I have no issue with first trimester abortion. In my opinion it is not wrong. Why does your opinion matter? The government does not make laws based on any particular brand of religion. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it is wrong...it means it is wrong for you. Once again...you don't like abortion...don't get one.
6 months ago: PH? Seriously. You said, "Once again...you don't like abortion...don't get one."

Everyone will agree that is an appropriate statement.

I ask. Does that include my being able to opt out my tax dollars that fund abortions by government mandate?
Perfect Horizon
Perfect Horizon
Chicago, IL
6 months ago: Why is it inappropriate? Maybe I think it's inappropriate for you to try and tell other people that they should live by your oppressive religious moral code.

Prove that your personal tax dollar paid for any abortion.
6 months ago: PH,

Certain abortions may be legal... however Planned (Genocide) Parenthood is doing some very illegal things and putting many in danger. This post is about some wannabe Bible thumping impostor, who can't get a real job so he has to deceive people in the name of God. If guys like us weren't making a difference in public opinion on this issue, guys like you wouldn't have much to say !:]
6 months ago: Did I say inappropriate?
6 months ago: Even if it is a single tax penny?
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
6 months ago: It's perfectly legal for a corporation to send American jobs overseas. It's perfectly legal for banks to charge exorbitant fees. It's perfectly legal for lobbyists to bribe lawmakers with perks and promises of financial contributions.

There are hundreds of things that are legal that are immoral.
Perfect Horizon
Perfect Horizon
Chicago, IL
6 months ago: Yes, prove that one penny of YOUR tax money paid for an abortion.
Perfect Horizon
Perfect Horizon
Chicago, IL
6 months ago: OOTB: Again, you have no right to tell me what should be immoral to me. You have your definition (based mostly/entirely in dogmatic religious beliefs) and that is fine...but according to the Constitution of the United States of America you have ZERO right to try and tell me to live by the same code. Christians are not the morals police of this country, live by your moral code, nobody can stop you...but stay out of my life with your god fearing belief system.
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
6 months ago: Ah, so noted. For future reference, you also have no right to tell me I have to pay a higher rate in taxes than someone less advantaged than I, just because your moral code says that I should. And corporations should be free to fleece the general public, because their morality is not the same definition as yours.

And along those lines, I guess you would not be opposed to someone having sex with a willing minor child, because religious morality and taboos about sex should not be the deciding factor in our laws.

One man's morality is another man's prison.
Perfect Horizon
Perfect Horizon
Chicago, IL
6 months ago: A much expected response given your position and beliefs.

You are trying to apply different standards of morality to different areas of life. Corporations lying/stealing are not the same as abortion. Stealing is not something that is bound by Christian beliefs as wrong. I'm an atheist and I think stealing is wrong...so do Muslims, Jews, Christians, Catholics, Hindus, Buddhists, Atheists, Agnostics, Wiccans, Pagans, Pantheists, Druids, it is not a religious argument as to whether stealing is wrong. Abortion is a separate issue, you believe it is ending a human life. I believe if it is done in the first trimester it is the removal of a parasitic cell with no resemblance to human life (human life requires self awareness which requires consciousnesses which requires a fully functional brain). You believe that life begins at conception (a common christian belief). There is a difference between this argument which is directly related to your religious beliefs and the argument that stealing is wrong (a common HUMAN belief).

As for the minor child thing...Doug Hutchinson and Courtney Stodden got married not too long ago...oh...did I mention that he is 50 and she is 16 (Parental consent laws are fun..) As for taboos about sex...America is insanely uptight, in Europe things are much more relaxed and people don't have a fit and call the FCC over everything.

I don't think you should have to pay higher taxes than anyone else. I am a strong proponent of eliminating the income tax all together and instead using a national sales tax.
6 months ago: Right or wrong is not ultimately determined by government mandate. That's what you need to understand.

Also, you are correct in that right or wrong is not determined by me. It is not determined by you either nor is it arbitrary or relative.
6 months ago: Perfect H (Altruist)

You sound like 'Al' any thing the Democrazies want is good enough for you? What ever is legal is good... just don't cry when your retirement is flushed or your jobs are out-sourced and your paper money isn't worth toilet tissue!
6 months ago: Truthie, welcome back into the gutter of GOD. I was wondering when you would have had enough.

God keeps a list...forever... 1 star for Truthie...

Sometimes you have to get down in the trench to fight the sh|t.
6 months ago: Just a F.Y.I. Truthie...toilets don't scrub themselves...
Perfect Horizon
Perfect Horizon
Chicago, IL
6 months ago: What is a Democrazies? Did you perhaps mean Democrat but decided to be stupid on purpose? If so, the answer is: NO!. I don't like a whole lot of anything that either party is trying to do. A few things however are "good enough" for me from both parties:

Republicans: I like that they tend to defend the 2nd Amendment. I also think that a few of the Republicans are smart enough to try and not overstep the bounds of the Constitution in terms of having the federal government manage things that should be handled by the states.

Democrats: They support liberty and freedom for American citizens more than Republicans and take seriously the whole "All men are created equal" part (this means the legality of Gay Marriage) and that they tend to not try to govern based on their own oppressive religious code (abortion rights for example).
6 months ago: PH,

"Stupid on purpose?" That's the only way we are stupid... like your statement "stealing is wrong" ...seriously? Maybe you mean Corporate takeovers and bankruptcies, out-sourcing, govt subsidy and GMO's aren't stealing?? Just because someone paid someone to make something legal doesn't mean it is right. And... just because people have been brainwashed to believe killing a premature child is OK because it is legal... is even sicker than serial killers who own it!
Perfect Horizon
Perfect Horizon
Chicago, IL
6 months ago: Stealing is stealing. I don't think it is anybodies right to tell a business that they don't have the right to produce their goods wherever they want.

I'm not brainwashed. Human life does not exist during the first trimester of a pregnancy. If you don't like abortion...don't get one...your oppressive religious beliefs have no bearing on my life or anybody else's.
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
6 months ago: Stealing is stealing. Is it always morally wrong? Is it wrong for a father to steal if that was the only way he could feed his hungry children? Is it wrong for him to steal medicine that he cannot afford to buy, to treat his sick child? Or is it all relative?

Murder is murder. Is it wrong to euthanize an old person?
Is it wrong to kill a severely handicapped or vegetative person who is living a life of constant pain?
Is it wrong to kill your two year old child if he were inevitably about to be kidnapped by torturous sex-slavers, or torn apart by ravenous wolves, thus saving him untold pain and suffering?
Is it wrong to kill your newborn, because you didn't think you could provide for it?
Is it wrong to destroy a potential life that you created through a deliberate physical act, just because you __________________?
6 months ago: "Stealing is stealing"... Did you or do you support Robinhood?
sunny2
sunny2
6 months ago: Box it is on an upswing in grocery stores to see these famished children. They wander around the stores and put food into their mouths. I saw one young woman put twinkies in her mouth another ice pops. They go for the sweets ans sugary things. Most people turn the other way. Even the stores, don't seem to follow them around and prosecuting them. It is the people who rob your puse when you turn your back that I'm more concerned with. Crime is getting to be more and more and people leaving their homes are not safe any more to go out in public without keeping an eye open for trouble. I almost expect it when I go out because of the heavy crime across the country.
sunny2
sunny2
6 months ago: You can look at him and know he is a sicko.
This kind is running loose and having an influence on society?
sunny2
sunny2
6 months ago: Until either side does something to benefit the people, both are no good.
sunny2
sunny2
6 months ago: I'll say it again a 1000 times if I have to. A fetus instinctively get its sustenance from the mother to live. Once it has grown full term, it fights it's way to a doorway to its life. You have to know that feeling of being kicked from the inside, morning sickness, carrying that little person, and giving birth to know that child knows it has a place in life. Once it has entered, it is aggressive to fulfill its purpose in life. It can't do anything for itself, so it becomes demanding. So, nobody is going to tell me that little squiggly person doesn't have a soul from the beginning because it does what it has to do. A baby can cry all night and keeps you up all night, and at the same time can bring ultimate joy. When you look into that babies eyes at birth, you know who it is. Just because it starts out small, doesn't mean that it is anything else but a living being with a heart and soul. I think everything is born to bring love and carry on to do their part. We start saying that the fetus is nothing that could mean the end of civilization.
Perfect Horizon
Perfect Horizon
Chicago, IL
6 months ago: Sunny, After a child is born then it is certainly a person...The argument I make is based on the first trimester (12-13 weeks). During this time a functional brain is not present, personhood requires self awareness, which requires consciousness which requires a fully functional brain (typically the brain is fully functional and developed around week 24-25 of pregnancy). This is my opinion on the matter, again I respect your opinion and if you and people with the same mindset feel the need to not have abortions then that is great, but if other people feel that abortion is the right choice for them, and that choice is made during the first trimester then I really think that the liberty of choice of that woman is paramount.
sunny2
sunny2
6 months ago: Everyone can do what they want. I can't tell people what to do or think, and you have a right to your opinion. But, of course, I'm against it. If there is a medical reason, then that is different because it can't be avoided. I was arguing the point that a fetus is alive and functions because it has to begin some where, and it knows what to do to survive even at that stage. It doesn't have its skeletal system either, but it doesn't mean that it won't and that it is not preparing for it. Everything begins with a seed. So, why can't the beginning be as important as the end. If I kill the fetus, I'm not allowing it to live when it had an opportunity to. So, who is guilty. I would be a murderer. I don't think when it comes to a normal pregnancy, and nothing is wrong, that the woman is paramount and she comes first. That's why we are called mothers. The child is first. It is what we were designed to do. That's the way I feel.
6 months ago: I don't know how I missed this before.

Beautifully said Sunny. Beautiful.
sunny2
sunny2
6 months ago: Thank you Huey. I'm a mother and that is what comes first always and forever.
Father's, too.
6 months ago: ??? "Stealing is stealing. Is it always morally wrong? Is it wrong for a father to steal if that was the only way he could feed his hungry children? Is it wrong for him to steal medicine that he cannot afford to buy, to treat his sick child? Or is it all relative?"

That must apply to those other 57 states...uh 56...not in Texas if you can prove it.
sunny2
sunny2
6 months ago: It's wrong for people to lie in Court Rooms and swear to the truth with their hand on the Bible. That's stealing, too, they are stealing from their character for gain. There are all forms of stealing.
sunny2
sunny2
2 months ago: Words from the link: "If you live gladly to make others glad in
God, your life will be hard, your risks will be high, and your joy
will be full. This is not a book about how to avoid a wounded
life, but how to avoid a wasted life. Some of you will die in the
service of Christ. That will not be a tragedy. Treasuring life
above Christ is a tragedy."

Lots of truth in that statement.
sunny2
sunny2
2 months ago: No one replied to "Stealing is Stealing" .
I think when a situation comes to feeding a child or getting medicine for that child a parent will do anything they have to do. I don't think you can pass judgment harshly.
I often recall that same concept being brought up in the early years of school.
The teacher told a story of how a man in ancient times in Rome stole bread to feed his family and was arrested and tortured for it. When you are a child your mind is free from obstacles and uncluttered in your thinking because you are dependent on your own parents to keep you safe and secure. That's all you can see clearly. I remember at that time thinking it was wrong for that person to be punished just for taking a loaf of bread.
I believe today circumstances that may provoke that action are taken into consideration and the law wouldn't be that cruel.
Although, I don't know about other countries where their cultures are still uncivilized and barbaric.
Then, of course, we still have State agencies that will help or present themselves as such. We think they will anyway, until they tell you to empty your pockets to see if you have any money on you because you have to be completely without a dime to get help. Look at all the red tape you have to go through waiting while your family may starve to death or die waiting for medical treatment. I don't think it is always a moral issue.
sunny2
sunny2
Content Removed by sunny2
sunny2
sunny2
2 months ago: I like to add there are limits to everything.
Food is one thing when there is desperation, but not robbing people, committing serious crimes, or hurting others. That is morally wrong and can't be justified for whatever reason.
As I said before, kids are walking around food stores grabbing anything they can to feed themselves, the people look the other way many times. How do you judge them? You can't. Is it morally wrong was the question? Probably, but there is reason.

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.