Science & Technology

Rant

Origin of the Moon

Posted 13 months ago|14 comments|684 views
Creation or Collision
VIDEOS
Written by
ON my way to work today I walked for about a quarter mile... all the while looking up into the morning sky at the Moon. An amazing neighbor so close... sometimes you would think you could touch it. I was thinking what would we do without the moon... would our oceans be huge stagnant sloughs without the tides from the moon? SO I thought I would look up some interesting facts and theories for it's origin and it's purpose...
...and can we live without it?

My first exploration took me on a quandary through the National Geographic's version of the origin of the Moon... and I found a glossy layout, of how the Moon originated as a result of a major collision the Earth had with a Mars size planet. It read so "matter of fact" that one would assume that they were there taking the pictures as it happened...

"The impact was at just the right angle to almost bounce off, but to be captured and swallowed by the Earth. The highly oblique impact struck a glancing blow to the Earth's surface and set up giant shock waves that spalled material into space. The surface of the Earth was heated and may have begun to boil --not just the Oceans, but the rock itself!"
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/life-01x1...

...as echoed in this feature in Space Daily, it seems a done deal as to how the Moon got up there in the first place... but is it logical? I mean it doesn't matter how it got there, we can still enjoy it's magnificence... it just seem so tidy and picture perfect, could it really be as a result of a catastrophic collision? WHERE is all the debris, wouldn't there be rings of debris like Saturn? Looking deeper it wasn't just the lack of debris that was the problem with the theory... but lack of facts.

"Evolutionary astronomers have great trouble accounting for the origin of the moon. There have generally been three competing hypotheses, but they all have serious physical problems..."
http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v14/i...

It would seem that every 10 years or so comes along another Moon origin theory... postulated in grandeur as if it was recorded in real-time on high-def ...only to be debunked along with all the other "scientific" facts. But, what is the alternative? Surely not Creation... even if all the evidence points to a tidy placing of the Moon, we have come too far to recess back into the Dark Ages with mere faith?!? THE thing about true science is that it is observable, not only that is that it accepts evidence not based on bias or popular belief. It is on this basis I forward the following videos that debunk "scientific" theory and postulation.

Our Created Moon, Parts 1-3
http://www.answersingenesis.org/media/vi...

There is no Moon like it that we know of... sitting up there equally life preserving as the Sun is life giving. As dependents on the Sun we are also dependents of the Moon, without it life on Earth would cease. Consider timing, orbit, speed and balance... everything including the origin of man, needed to come together in perfect harmony at the same time for it all to work. Just look up and observe
...what the prophets of old have declared from the beginning...

"The heavens declare the glory of God, and the sky above proclaims his handiwork. Day to day pours out speech, and night to night reveals knowledge. There is no speech, nor are there words, whose voice is not heard." (Psalm 19:1-3)

Truth it would seem, can hardly compete with Holly Wood productions and great documentaries that give you play-by-play "as it happens" on the formation of he world or the Moon. There is NO remaining evidence to support any collision theory, let alone any other theory that has fallen by the wayside... and the more evidence that debunks them,
it would seem less reason to remove them from the textbooks.

The facts don't seem to play as big a part as one would think in modern "science", grants and funding play a huge part with the results, and movie production seems to make up for any lack in substantial evidence.
I as others enjoy a good movie, but there is no substitute for observation...
So, enjoy the Creation first-hand, do your own science experiment... and observe.

UPDATE - 1 month ago
"Don't Waste Your Life" by John Piper
http://dwynrhh6bluza.cloudfront.net/reso...
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
13 months ago: Origin of the Moon? The split from the Gulf of Mexico....
13 months ago: Btw, a single tweet for a post is effective. Unless your ego tells you that 30 retweets for top site points as ego-needed.
13 months ago: I think I got it, not interested in spots or proceeds... just getting the word out.
13 months ago: Every seven minutes for the same post? Not likely to get too many readers using the bully pulpit tweets. Tweet it once and see if it takes. Otherwise, tweet it 100 times to keep your position in the top rankings. No? HUmmmmmm....ego....
13 months ago: Like I said. While we are looking up at the moon and wondering. Is there a reason you blocked me on twitter?
13 months ago: Yeah TCG,

Because of this, I am writing a post of something worth talking or fighting about and you call me out on twitter? Doesn't make sense. If you want to message me, great, it just didn't seem fitting. Oh well.
13 months ago: Funny. I think I mentioned it to you several times in the past with no change in behavior in over tweeting your posts for points. You wonder why I have not tweeted any of your posts? Maybe because you seem to over tweet them already. You can call it getting the word out if you like. It is only one step below what SmartyGirl was doing. Yeah, oh well. Truth or not?
13 months ago: and, before you accuse me of spamming twitter I suggest you take a hard look at the tweets. They are from many authors. Such as Tom, Amish, Coloranter, Altruist, OOTB, RSG, Perfect and yes myself among others. Your rantrave tweets include a list of one.
13 months ago: TCG,

Keep'm coming, if you fill the comment section everyday... I'll be sure to get the top Rant soon enough !:] And you know us spammers, we'll take what we can get !:]
13 months ago: IT would seem that both the Earth and the Moon have been co-dependent on each other from the start... such a tidy and neat match... one would think they were created for each other !:]
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
13 months ago: I think before we consider the origin of the moon we should consider the process by which the entire solar system was created. It started as a blob of hydrogen gas which coalesced and compacted until pressures and temperatures allowed fusion and that process then spewed out the heavier elements. These in turn flew around bumping into each other in a process that formed the planets and the moons orbiting them. One large moon indicates that it had the gravitational pull to clean up all of the rest of the debris around the planet.

The rings around saturn might have formed when two moons collided and disintegrated.
13 months ago: Altruist,

The gravity on Saturn is similar to Earth and it has rings of debris... and the Moon has a sixth of the Earth's gravity... so if the Earth didn't pull in all the debris... the Moon sure wouldn't if there had been a history of a planetary collision.

"A collision which would have ejected material less than the Roche limit would have formed only rings around the earth..."
http://www.godandscience.org/love/sld027...
13 months ago: The biggest mistake in the origin of the Earth and Moon story is that it started out as a fire ball... with the intense heat of molten lava... where did we get all this water? IF one says that water just appeared after the earth cooled down... it just isn't logical.

Here is some great links for other Creation questions...
http://www.nwcreation.net/geologylinks.h...


Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.