News & Politics

Rant

Obama: Wrong on Harvard,Honduras

Posted 34 months ago|17 comments|1,473 views
Written by
Rudi Stettner
 Moderator
Does anyone remember back in 1971 during the Charles Manson trial? Charles Manson was on trial for the murder of Sharon Tate and seven other people. It was a case that captivated the nation. Richard Nixon, who was President at that time declared to reporters that Charles Manson was"guilty, directly or indirectly of eight murders." The country was in an uproar. For a sitting President to comment in front of a live microphone on a a case being tried was roundly condemned not only by pundits but by anyone with any legal expertise at all.

Charles Manson's defense team immediately demanded a mistrial and that the charges be dismissed. Manson himself sat in court holding up a newspaper with the headline "Manson Guilty, Nixon Declares." The judge quizzed the jury and then put one of the attorneys in jail for three days for leaving the newspaper within Manson's reach.

Fast forward to 2009. A Cambridge police officer, James Crowley might be facing charges for arresting a politically connected professor, Henry Louis Gates, who was spewing abuse at him. It turns out that the police officer who arrested the Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates was respected by both African American and white fellow officers. The New York Post reports as follows on his past record.



Cambridge Sgt. James Crowley has taught a class on racial profiling for five years at the Lowell Police Academy after being hand-picked for the job by former police Commissioner Ronny Watson, who is black, said Academy Director Thomas Fleming.


"The course, called "Racial Profiling," teaches about different cultures that officers could encounter in their community "and how you don't want to single people out because of their ethnic background or the culture they come from," Fleming said.

Meanwhile, Crowley disclosed in an interview with the Boston Herald that he gave mouth-to-mouth resuscitation to NBA star Reggie Lewis.

"I wasn't working on Reggie Lewis the basketball star. I wasn't working on a black man. I was working on another human being," Sgt. James Crowley, told the Boston Herald."





While it is true that the officer was in Professor Henry Louis Gates' home, ascertaining the full facts was made very difficult due to the lack of cooperation from Professor Gates. Although the Boston Globe has scrubbed its original article, the police report is available here.

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/Police%20report%20on%20Gates%20arrest.PDF

It seems that the arrest was indeed warranted. Unfortunately, Harvard University political clout , political expediency and a get out of jail free race card voided an arrest that was amply justified. At least Officer Crowley's superiors are standing behind him.

Professor Gates has indeed educated the public. He has shown the nation the low esteem in which our President holds law enforcement. The President of the United States has a lot of influence and an ability to command the attention of a nation and indeed the world. This carries with it major responsibility. As a lawyer, Barack Obama should be familiar with this.

Obama fell into the same trap as Nixon did, of running his mouth about a matter that is working its way through the courts.

The shrinking esteem in which Obama is held will probably limit the damage his ill considered remarks have had. Unfortunately, Mr. Obama has a place on the world stage as well. Manuel Zelaya, who was constitutionally removed from office under Honduran law enjoyed the benefits of Obama's ill advised support as he shamelessly clung to the doorknob of the Presidential palace. Had he spoken in favour of a rightist, the press would have condemned Obama as a Yankee imperialist. It seems that both Obama and Yankee imperialism are now in fashion among the Euro trash and the ditzerati.

We are likely to hear a lot more from Obama and his teleprompter during his period of on the job training. Hopefully nothing terrible will happen. The prospect of elder statesman Joe Biden offering his wisdom is not a heartening one.

The auto industry that President Obama is trying so desperately to save offers an irresistible frame of metaphor for advice Mr. Obama would do well to heed.

Don't shift your mouth into drive when your brain is in park.


Reprinted with permission from Rudistettner.com
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
34 months ago: No kidding. This continuing story just keeps smelling worse and worse. If you don't agree that it won't pass the smell test. Just use your imagination and reverse every color and apply the same actions. Would it then be laughable? It's sad that racism is acceptable in certian directions.
Billyberoo
Billyberoo
Cedar Park, TX
34 months ago: He is just plain wrong on a lot of things. I may be wrong, I was tired coming home from a long work night at 5:00 a.m., but I heard a radio report that he felt he let his emotions get the best of him and may have over reacted and invited the cop and Gates to the White House to "work things out over a beer." Now if true I realize it's a P.R. stunt, but being in the Bar biz for a while, I stopped a lot of fights just by buying the two parties a drink and having them sit down together for a few minutes to talk to each other, and not perform what each thought the crowd wanted to see. Just a thought.
34 months ago: Henry Louis Gates might or might not be guilty, President Obama did not comment.

The police might or might not talk with Henry Louis Gates in his own home, or anywhere else. President Obama did not comment.

What did Obama say? He said the police acted stupidly.

I agree, the police acted stupidly. About the rest, I've no idea.

The author of this rant, Rudi Stettner, seems unable to pry apart these two ideas.

1. A sitting president declares a man on trial is guilty.
2. A sitting president declares a man acted stupidly.

See any difference? I do, perhaps you don't.
34 months ago: I agree billy, however if a public attack is made and later you find more facts that don't support that public attack, would it not be fair to make a public retraction?

I don't quite follow how he can mediate without trust by one of the parties. The reason your plan worked is those people had no reason not to trust you.
Billyberoo
Billyberoo
Cedar Park, TX
34 months ago: 2. A sitting president declares a man acted stupidly.
That is a comment. An assumption, because he does not know local procedure.

Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
34 months ago: To whom it may concern
There is no difference between the Nixon example and the Obama examole.
A sitting president voiced his opinion about an active case in a state's lower court system, knowing full well that his stated opinion could affect the outcome of said case.

What you can't seem to pry apart is the
Federal Government and the State Government. They are not one and the same, and the President, of all people, should have the common sense to make the distinction.

Is he entitled to his opinion? By all means, yes.
Is he entitled to voice his opinion publicly about a State matter that is in due process? No.
Jabberwocky
Jabberwocky
Hollywood, FL
34 months ago: In the first place, the commenter has obviously not HEARD what the President said.

He said that he did not have any facts to say it was RACE related, however, the police acted stupidly in arresting a man once they had seen his ID and realized he was the owner.

This is not just about the black boy President sticking up for another black man.

WHY did the police arrest GATES if not to HUMILIATE him? We see this all the time. Whenever a black man in America becomes something MORE than the ghetto sterotype, the entire white race begins to plan HOW TO REDUCE HIM TO A LESSER BEING. They did it to Michael Jackson, inventing all manner of evil things about him- all taken back now, but too late. Now, a black professor who is irascible (is it only white artists that are entitled to eccentricity?) is HUMBLED and made to BOW down to WHITEY.

Thanks Cambridge police. AND THANK YOU GOD that I dont LIVE in the "land of the FREE" because obviously only "REAL" (read white) Americans are free there.
34 months ago: Jabberwocky, Did you even read the police report that is linked?

The man in his own words stated that the door could not be secured because of a previous break in. I for one would be grateful that any police person would be checking by on a 911 call from a concerned third party that saw someone using force to open my front door. It could have been a simple break in up to a home invasion. I'm having a hard time not thinking he is just pre-selling his next project with self made illusions.
JAK Gladney
JAK Gladney
Saint Albans, WV
34 months ago: What an echo chamber.

Zelaya was "constitutionally" removed, by Honduras' right-wing, School of the Americas'-tainted, Reagan-era- influenced military. The same military that has shot protesters. The same military that "heroically" thwarted a non-binding public consultation on rewriting the Honduran constitution.

See peaceful Honduran military in action:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qycd07aETe8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRS24Gy2zz4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRS24Gy2zz4

It amazes me, Rudi: you can see video like this, shot in Iran, celebrate clear video evidence of the democratic process on the march, and condemn Obama for not acting more aggressively in it's defense. Don't twist yourself into a pretzel reversing yourself here.

Does the thought ever cross your mind: there are mechanisms, in transparent, constitutional democracies, for holding and publicly trying officials accused of violating the constitution. So why was Zelaya sent into exile? We know that this military doesn't shy from public bloodletting.

Military aid to Latin American friendlies exploded under Bush administration patronage. U.S. Southern Command--SOUTHCOM--maintains a significant and aggressive military footprint throughout Latin America. And the American right's willingness to intervene on the side of American businesses in L.A. threatened by agrarian/labor reforms (the kind promised by Zelaya)--like Chiquita (formerly United Fruit Co.)--is well-documented.

Maybe it would help to study that history before condemning Obama's break with this shameful past. Zelaya's ouster has been universally condemned--not just by "Euro trash" or "the ditzerati". These are straw man arguments, and not supported by the facts.
JAK Gladney
JAK Gladney
Saint Albans, WV
34 months ago: Third link should be:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2rfo2_U4JY&NR=1
34 months ago: Strange how this has evolved, and it is a good thing.
To suggest that the people on the boarders MAINTAIN illegal immigration by paying higher local taxes caused by the lack of the "Federal Government" doing their job and blaming the ones below for the situation.
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
34 months ago: Anybody want to play race cards?


Go Fish!
34 months ago: Jabber:
Do you have chip on your shoulder or what?

JAK:
And talking about pretzels. It's amazing (and enlightening) how you libs see things.

For instance, your comment about Military Aid exploding under Bush. Do you deliberately ignore Chavez, Ortega's and other socialists' attempts at undermining the constitutional government of Honduras or can you not help yourself?
JAK Gladney
JAK Gladney
Saint Albans, WV
34 months ago: The constitutional argument is muddy. The Honduran constitution has no mechanism for amending term limits. It's been THOUGHT that Zelaya meant to address this question through a Constituent Assembly in November. As others have argued, winning that referendum was no guarantee that the Assembly would ever meet (the referendum was non-binding), or that it would address term limits if it did. The military "action" (though I don't know why we stop short of calling it a "coup"--even conservative writers have started using the term) puts an end to all this speculation.

Further complicating matters, the Honduran constitution has no impeachment provision. (It does, btw, demand insurrection as a remedy for taking office by military force).

Chavez is a convenient scapegoat (Evo Morales is another favorite). Pro-Venezuela/Chavez sentiments have been notably absent from the Zelaya demonstrations (this, again, is what the few agents of the free press still in Honduras say: the current media in Honduras is advancing the same conservative "White Propaganda" advanced throughout the 1980's, with Chavez playing the role of Communist stooge).
34 months ago: OOTB, I guess JAK does. "White Propaganda" go fish.

You were doing so well until you reverted.
JAK Gladney
JAK Gladney
Saint Albans, WV
34 months ago: "White Propaganda" has nothing to do with skin color or racial identity politics, TCG.

"White" (as opposed to "black" or "gray") propaganda refers to overt propaganda, so closely associated with a particular regime as to reflect an official viewpoint. The program, under Otto Reich, was actually called "Operation White Propaganda".
34 months ago: Thanks for the clarification JAK. "White Propaganda" is overt. I have to ask because of the open connotation. Is "Grey/Black" propaganda therefore covert?

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.