News & Politics

Rant

Obama Sends Troops to Australia, "Not afraid of China"

Posted 18 months ago|20 comments|936 views
Written by
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
Obama has announced his intention to send 2500 troops to Australia, to offset what is perceived as China's increasing aggression in the region. "The notion that we fear China is mistaken" quipped Obama, at a news conference on Wednesday.

What strikes me odd is that all the campaign speeches about reasoning with our competitors on the world stage have come to naught. His Peace prize, handed out for what he said he was going to do, and not for what he actually had done, languishes on whatever shelf he undoubtedly proudly displays it.

Iran, now the subject of even harsher sanctions, imposed by Obama, has not been impressed with his rhetoric and posturing. After all, he called them a "tiny country, no threat at all." Obama's rhetoric seems to have come to nothing, except to strengthen Iran's resolve.

Now, can Obama with a straight face expect anyone to believe that he's going to get tough with a huge country, to whom we owe over a trillion dollars? The same country that he will no doubt need to borrow from again?


But the thing that makes me really ponder, considering China's armed forces consists of over 2,300,000 combat ready soldiers. Is Obama sending the message that he thinks one American soldier is worth 1000 Chinese soldiers?
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
18 months ago: Check mate in two...
18 months ago: Is that how it is... start a war with someone you don't want to pay back? Isn't that what the US was accused of with Iraq and Libya... better get another mode of operation before everyone gets killed.
18 months ago: 2.3 million combat ready soldiers sounds to Obama like a fire ant mound. Just a nuisance (until it splits and splits and splits...)

I wonder if he has ever stepped on one. He had best learn that you need to kill the queen to kill the mound.

Oh yeah. He tried that...several times with no success...
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
18 months ago: Bush was a master of the foolish stupid use of power. He tried to use force to coerce or steal resources in the old imperialistic manner. That doesn't work too well as Iraq has shown us.

China is using "Soft Power" . Essentially they help the nations in return for it's resources. For that reason they are not a direct threat militarily. http://csis.org/files/media/csis/pubs/09...

America under Obama has learned from it's mistakes and is now using "Smart Power" to counter China's growing might.

So far everything "Smart power" has worked out pretty well. Got Osama and Ghaddafi, and the troops are coming home from Iraq. http://csis.org/program/smart-power-init...

The no nothings on the other side of the hill insist of simple solutions to complex problems which are invariably wrong. They would have us in another war if elected.

They don't realize that war with Iran would be twice as hard as war with Iraq.
18 months ago: Really? Your time frame for everything working out is the last two days?

"So far everything "Smart power" has worked out pretty well. Got Osama and Ghaddafi, and the troops are coming home from Iraq."

Let me explain it to you....

Al Qaeda is still active in planning to kill you, your children and your grandchildren...

Even though Obama killed Bin Laden (with Bush era intelligence).

Yep. Gadaffi really got a good Obama up his rear before the final Obama to the head. Was that to show the world the Obama assassination plan?

Troops are coming home from Iraq? Why? Tell the truth...

Because of an Obama screw up in not getting what he requested from the Iraqi government to retain the troops in Iraq after December 31, 2011.

Please, go defecate on some other curb with your OWS butties.
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
18 months ago: Yes, that makes how many? Two so far, unarmed and defenseless old men whose deaths Obama takes credit for.

They talk out of both sides of their mouths. First, Obama was just a minor player in Libya, then he gets full credit for assassinating Ghaddafi, the leader of a a sovereign nation.

And also, at first, they said bin Laden was justified in his attacks on the US because of our imperialistic meddling in their countries affairs. Then, when Navy Seals burst in on an unarmed, frail and sick bin Laden, killing him without giving him the chance to surrender, and then allegedly dumping his body into the ocean before anyone could investigate, Obama was a hero.

I guess you CAN have it both ways.
sunny2
sunny2
18 months ago: I have no sympathy for terrorists who became sick and frail, and we should of treated with kid gloves. They were just as evil then as they were when they bought the farm. They killed their own people. Did they look at the youth and the sick and frail and have any sympathy for them? No. They killed with cold-blooded hearts.
As far as Obama he has an air about him that just does not cut it with me. Even if he brings the troops home as promised, where are the jobs. They will be treated with indifference. They make a big thing about starting some little campaign about getting the military jobs and back into the circuit, just to make themselves look good before an election. He walks in and takes credit for almost everything that he didn't orchestrate himself. I don't see any future in his Administration.
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
18 months ago: No sympathy for terrorists, just a respect for international law. Obama sent a military force into a sovereign country, without permission, to perform an assassination which could have just as easily been an arrest. Osama bin Ladin was responsible for not nearly as many deaths as Saddam Hussein, yet Hussein was given his day in court, and bin Laden was turned into fish food before anyone could even see that it was even really him.

And Gaddafi was murdered, captured, unarmed, and defenseless on the side of a dusty road. If Obama gets credit for taking out Gaddafi, then he is responsible for violating international law concerning ethical treatment of POWs.
sunny2
sunny2
18 months ago: Box, I don't like what our country does either. Nobody is innocent. I've never seen it so openly bad.
I've said many times I wonder about some of the things Obama has done and then waltzes in and takes credit. It is so obvious.
I just can't say that I care in the slightest about the people who are the Devil's advocates. They think we are fools because they already think we are weak. They don't care about killing you or me or our families.
I'm not saying it is right to kill such as an eye for an eye or a tooth for a tooth. I don't agree with that. I'm saying I don't have sympathy. I saw the Towers burn in front of me. I'm not going to care two cents about them. Innocent people with a lot of talent died that day from the likes of those devils.
18 months ago: "Nobody is innocent" Sunny? Ok. How about they get their day in court before getting a bayonette shoved up their rear end just before a bullet to the head?

Fair enough? Captured Alive and Murdered.

You miss the point. Saddam was captured by the U.S. Soldiers and treated as a POW. Allowed a trial before his own people and then sent on his way.

Obama had a chance to capture Bin Laden and haul his rear out alive. No?
Your telling me a Seal team could not take him alive. Really? It took multiple Seal shots to the body and eyeball to take him? The order came from above. Dead, dead, dead.

Just like Obama wants to say that the U.S. had no functional military froces in Libya. Then we see Hillary laughing on video saying...

"We came, we saw, he's dead" while laughing.

Yeah. Makes me real proud of our President and his Administration.
18 months ago: BTW Sunny. Ain't it real strange that all of those Seals are now dead, dead, dead?
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
18 months ago: Obama may not be perfect, I think he shouldn't have increased troops in Afghanistan and should have eliminated all the mercenaries, and should shut down about half the foreign bases and cut the military spending in half. But the foreign policy of the Republicans is simply the opposite of what Obama would do, which is incredibly stupid.

Bush had either given up on Osama Bin Laden or was intentionally protecting him (Tora Bora). Bush was the one that set the date for withdrawal from Iraq, but Obama had the guts to do it. The right said we should go into Libya till Obama did, than they said we shouldn't have.

If you want to watch a real comedy watch the next republican Debate which is supposed to be about foreign policy. The only one that has a clue is Huntsman but he doesn't have a chance because he is rational and actually worked for Obama.

Romney has been on every side of every issue, Cain and Perry would both flunk grade school geography. Rand is OK with foreign policy because he would end the wars, shut down all foreign bases, and bring everyone home, he is just nuts in every other area.

Many of them would have us in yet a third unnecessary war, not realizing that war with Iran would be twice as hard as Iraq.

Something the Right doesn't understand is that 94% of terrorists are not Muslim. http://www.loonwatch.com/2010/01/not-all...
sunny2
sunny2
18 months ago: You wrote: Something the Right doesn't understand is that 94% of terrorists are not Muslim
HUFF POST New York
NEW YORK — An "al-Qaida sympathizer" who plotted to bomb police and post offices in New York City as well as U.S. troops returning home has been arrested on numerous terrorism-related charges, city officials said Sunday.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg announced at a news conference the Saturday arrest of Jose Pimentel of Manhattan, "a 27-year-old al-Qaida sympathizer" who the mayor said was motivated by terrorist propaganda and resentment of U.S. troops in Afghanistan and Iraq.
The mayor said Pimentel, a U.S. citizen originally from the Dominican Republic, was "plotting to bomb police patrol cars and also postal facilities as well as targeted members of our armed services returning from abroad."

18 months ago: Will you eat these words when you find out that Jose Pimentel converted to Islam?
sunny2
sunny2
18 months ago: Al did you see this. Caitlin.Frazier@mail.house.gov
Last week the Congressional Progressive Caucus held an ad hoc hearing on the American people's top priority: job creation. The CPC has called on the so-called Super Committee to hold public hearings with expert testimony on how best to fix the economy. Since the committee failed to do so, we decided to hold our own. We even invited the Super Committee to join. We heard from Prof. Jeffrey Sachs of Columbia University, Dr. Julianne Malveaux of Bennett College for Women, Dr. John Irons with the Economic Policy Institute, Robert Borosage, co-director of the Campaign for America's Future, Dr. Rob Johnson of the Roosevelt Institute and Patriotic Millionaires, and Garrett Gruener, founder of Ask.com and a member of Patriotic Millionaires.
Dr. Sachs touted The People's Budget, stating that "it is the only [budget] that respects the needs of the American people." Mr. Gruener told Caucus members "Be firm in raising our taxes" regarding millionaires like him. Each witness presented economic and historic evidence that the best way to eliminate the nation's debt is by creating good-paying middle class jobs, ensuring that all Americans pay their fair share, and protecting Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security.
Last week, we also worked to curb Republican schemes to destroy 15 million American jobs, cut benefits for our nation's veterans and decimate Social Security and Medicare for our seniors through the so-called "Balanced Budget Amendment."
There's a lot of work going on in the Congressional Progressive Caucus to put America back to work and put the American dream back in reach for the 99%. Watch for more updates from the CPC soon.


18 months ago: I wonder why..."Mr. Gruener told Caucus members "Be firm in raising our taxes" regarding millionaires like him."...

Does he not know he can pay more than his minimum tax if he feels so guilty?
sunny2
sunny2
18 months ago: We have to wait and hope for the best even though we disagree on a lot of what is going on.
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
18 months ago: Sunny

"Waiting and hoping for the best" is what got us into this mess. It's time to pick a side.
sunny2
sunny2
18 months ago: I vote for the best person with the best character, if there is such a thing.
Nobody has answers. I did pick a side. I am always for the people and a Leader who at least cares about his Country and the people.
Box, what side did you pick? The people aren't waiting. They are trying to do something. There is no argument that will resolve the issues only action.
18 months ago: Funny.

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.