Sports

Rant

NFL & Players Lawsuits Galore:I banged my head I sue you for

Posted 3 months ago|10 comments|352 views
Written by
I certainly do have some sympathy for anyone who has ever had a concussion having had one in my teen years. However, concerning the legal struggles between the NFL and former players over the concussions going on now leaves me with a bad taste in my mouth. Having heard the report recently on ESPN I was not that impressed by the arguments brought about by some of the players in question.
Some of the players I saw on television do clearly have issues with memory, etc. but that being said they were also paid quite well for their efforts while in the league, which I believe, was done due to the physical risks involved. As Deacon Jones said last week on "Mike & Mike in the Morning" on ESPN, "They really don't know when their concussions started could have been in college or high school."

He is right exactly why they are only suing the NFL other than about the amount of money the league is worth. They should be suing every league they ever played in at all levels as well as any coaches who showed them how to duck their heads to avoid a tackle.

They were paid more than most people make in a lifetime to play a kids game where the risks involved are broken fingers, legs, arms for life. Men who worked unknowingly on Navy ships near asbestos took more risks unknowingly and for football players many of which claimed they were intelligent people to now claim that the league misled them with regards to the risks due to concussions are not fooling me at all. Many of the former players have college degrees of some kind and now we are supposed to believe that they did not have a grasp of the risks on their own.

They were in a big hurry to get into the league for the "big payday" so many other players got and were not worried about any issues past that point for so long now they want more money to cover their own mistakes financially. Failure to plan for their own life after football is their own mistakes and choices in life come with consequences or at least that's what I keep being told for my choices why should this be any different for former athletes who now have health issues?

My concussion may have left me with issues myself but I find it hard to blame anyone else for my decision to get on the wrestling mat and take that chance. Just as these players to include, the likes of Jim McMahon (Chicago Bears QB) who often played with reckless abandon are now having serious mental issues in their later years of life. That does not mean we all need to pay more than we do now for tickets, stadiums (let's face it they are worth millions that in most cases are paid for by public funds), jerseys and the like. More than likely the only thing that will come from a lawsuit in favor of the plaintiffs will result in the bankruptcy of the league and nothing else.

The league in my opinion is clearly holding back as they have been studying the use of impact measuring devices in helmets since I believe 2010 with no further action taken in the matter thus far. Clearly, their recent talk is nothing more than a PR action to test the waters and avoid the public reaction to their lack of better quality testing for the helmet companies who provide their helmets to keep costs down. For all we know they are reusing the NFL helmets at schools that receive donated athletic gear in the inner cities.

I believe that I have covered both sides and my reasons for disliking the lawsuits involving concussions and former NFL players. The risks they take to play a kid's game are theirs to choose to do or not regardless of their impact of those choices later in life with no one else to blame.

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=7536645...

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d81...

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/sto...

EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
3 months ago: Here is the counter point JLK. Football is an aggressive sport. It seems almost ridiculous to think that anyone taking up the sport professionally wouldn't know the risks involved but the hard facts are there in the lives of countless former professional athletes who now suffer from debilitating neurological disorders that stem from the repeated injuries they received to the head. The only other sport where such a runaway cases of brain injuries are seen is boxing and there is no disputing there that blows to the head is what caused these disorders. Should athletes sue? They shouldn't have to. The NFL much like Tobacco companies should own up to the hazards of their industry and be proactive about minimizing the dangers. Unlike Tobacco which is by its very nature a carcinogen and not a safe product, sports can be made safe. If it takes law suits to bring this about then so be it!
3 months ago: Here is the fix: ban the sport. That is what they do to other dangerous activities, just ask my state on which public body of water you can kite tube on. A few people get injured or killed and they banned it statewide. They can do the same for American style football, just takes a few minutes of the legislatures time and it's done. No more head injuries caused by deliberately smashing your head into someone else or the ground.

Should the even be allowed to sue? Probably not. They knew going into the sport that it could cause injuries that could be lifelong. If the coaches or others in charge deliberately smashed them over the head with a chair, then they have a case, against the person who wacked them, otherwise it is a baseless lawsuit in my opinion.
3 months ago: As I said in the article...They are paid for their talents and willingly sign the contract putting themselves in harms way. They are grown men who must take some responsibility for their choices including playing football.
3 months ago: People join the army knowing full well they may see combat and potentially die. Does that mean that service people who come out injured should not receive medical benefits for their injuries or that they should not receive better gear while in combat to protect them? Why, because they knew what they were getting into? Shouldn't they sue if they don't get the help they deserved?

The same logic applies to professional sports. Any participant in a combative engagement whether for entertainment or political gain should be protected to the best of the ability of those that authorized that engagement. It is not enough to say, "Tough luck buddy, you knew the risks!"

Whether you like sports or not, whether you agree with a war or not. These are our hero's. They are our legends and regardless if they know the risks or not they do not deserve to be discarded like yesterday's trash just because they were braver, more foolish or more talented than the rest of us.
3 months ago: Once you join the military you lose the right to sue for injuries caused by your service. There are exceptions but they are usually brought against an individual who oversteped their authority and the fault lies with them rather than the branch of service or government.

"Our hero's"????? Not hardly. They are sports figures, hero status is not something they can obtain. Might admire some of them for their abilities but they will never be hero's.
3 months ago: I'm sorry but I served in the Army and I don't remember being paid six figures. I also don't remember being offered an incentive package based upon playing time, receptions, total yardage, etc... The men and women who join the service often aren't making that kind of money and are serving a higher purpose in life knowing they will be able to possibly retire with benefits. Professional athletes are offered some kind of pension and benefits with "less time in service." Many players believe that their failure to get into the Pro's is an end to their lives as they know it. They push themselves and are pushed by family demands to make the "big money" with little to no regards to their health and welfare at that time.

The choice is theirs to risk their lives and career in sports knowing the risks and are rewarded for their hard work by at least a six figure income that soldiers don't make.
3 months ago: So a juicer contract means their lives are expendable? What about the run of the mill players that don't get endorsement deals? What about them? Should we throw them under the bus too? There is no excuse for inadequate safety measures.
3 months ago: I'm sorry but they also have a UNION they pay dues to that is supposedly in agreement with the NFL about safety issues why aren't they suing their own union as well.

Players have a choice from the moment they go to the combine, till the moment they retire if they fell their lives are in jeopardy or not being properly protected they can walk away. They chose to stay, play and to lie to coaching staff to get back on the field...
1 month ago: www.washingtonpost.com/sports/redskins/m...

Another player that was a lifetime of playing QB who probably had taken shots to his head since the first day he put on his pads..blaming the league alone because it has the money.
jenifa
jenifa
Port Orange, FL
13 days ago: thanks for good article

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.