News & Politics

Rant

Michele Bachmann, Census Resister

Posted 35 months ago|10 comments|1,453 views
Written by
JAK Gladney
Saint Albans, WV
Michele Bachmann is at it again.

In anticipation of the 2010 census, the Minnesota congresswoman told the Washington Times that her family “won’t be answering any information beyond” how many people live in the Bachmann household.

Bachmann called the census “the mother lode of all data information,” arguing that the questionnaire is “very intricate” and “personal.” I’d wager that most supermarket discount cards are more comprehensive.

Helpfully, the U.S. Census Bureau released a sample questionnaire—complete with explanations on why the particular question is useful, as well as each question’s pedigree (“Race”, asked since 1790 census; “Marital Status , asked since 1880 census, “Fertility”, asked since 1900 census, etc.).

I see documents like this as bunker-busters –they dislodge the most entrenched conspiracy theories. I’ve added a link to the sample survey (2nd link).

I only hope Bachman’s bunker has internet access.
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
35 months ago: So, I guessing you will answer all the questions?
The Census is a tax count right?
35 months ago: Those of you that really want to screw up the system need to send about a hundred letters to your home address with bogus first names (use your real last name in the addressed to)

joe Smith
joey Smith
john Smith

It's all tied together.
Think not?
JAK Gladney
JAK Gladney
Saint Albans, WV
35 months ago: This is the amazing thing to me: that conspiracy theories persist, even when you're given real, black-and-white explanations for the questions. You don't have to speculate--it's right there!!!

I generally like your posts, Cypress, but I'm starting to think you represent Phil Hendrie's key demographic.
35 months ago: You mistake me for more than I am. I just like to stir the pot and keep everyone else on their toes. Don't take it to heart. It's is meant to keep the pot boiling.
YammeringBuoy
YammeringBuoy
35 months ago: Yup, that barb bachman...pfft.
Artaqq
Artaqq
Fairfax, IA
35 months ago: I think that my comfort level would be a little higher if ACORN did not have such a prominent roll in the Census and the control of the Census was not put under White House jurisdiction. ie; "Obama angered Republicans in February with a decision to bring the U.S. Census Bureau, which is part of the Commerce Department, under closer White House jurisdiction.
Lawmakers accused Obama of making a partisan political decision ahead of the 2010 census, which will form the basis for redrawing electoral district boundaries."
This is concerning to Republicans and, if the shoe was on the other foot, there would be equal, justified concern. Additionally, the Nationalization of Private Industry and now Health Care gives the appearance of a huge, bureaucratic power grab. The emphasis on 'Community Organizing' and some of the propaganda that exists, with too many one-sided decisions being made is unsettling, to me. I'm no Bush apologist, by any means, he made a number of mistakes and the big one with approving the initial bail outs, through TARP, just opened the flood gates to all of this mad dash we're seeing. Sometimes it's better to do nothing right, than something wrong. I would like to see the Census for myself, before I cast any dispersions on the Governor. I guess, if the intent is a head count, (which it is), let it be a head count. I have heard that there are questions about what time you leave for work and some other questions that don't belong here. Just my opinion. Thank you and have a great Weekend. happy Father's Day, all youz' dads!
JAK Gladney
JAK Gladney
Saint Albans, WV
35 months ago: My apologies, Cypress. It's hard to guess tone on the internet.
35 months ago: Go girl!
She is exactly right.
35 months ago: Go girl!
She is exactly right.
Byron Watson
Byron Watson
Petal, MS
35 months ago: But why Acorn administering the census? Do you know that their federal funding increased from $53 million in the past 15 years to $8.5 buh buh buh billion under Obama? Isn't this the same old cronyism all over again?
Is our government not capable of even counting the people that live here? Or do they want results that might differ from those they get by traditional means?

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.