Culture & Lifestyle

Rant

Marijuana and SWAT Teams: The Fascist Law of Prohibition

Posted 21 months ago|18 comments|1,391 views
VIDEOS
Written by
ActiveInChange
Lafayette, LA
The Hemp Industries Association, Vote Hemp, several American manufacturers, and allied companies and organizations have declared May 17 to May 23 to be Hemp History Week. So with the up and coming commemoration on the horizon, I will take this time to reflect on the outright idiocy of marijuana laws and enforcement. Nobody who is against the use and cultivation of marijuana and industrial hemp should call themselves an American. Regulating someone's individual freedom while simultaneously oppressing an entire clean energy, clothing, paper, plastic, medicinal, and composite material industry is not only un-American, it is downright fascist. It is no wonder that the Constitution is under so much attack from today's bureaucrats; for it is written on hemp, the very enemy of the authoritarian personal liberty regulators. The attached video shows a SWAT team raiding a family's home. The father is thrown on the floor and beaten, the kids are taken, and their beloved family dog is brutally gunned down. This family was obviously a threat to society because they were in possession of a grinder, a pipe, and a small amount of marijuana. When will we realize that the enforcement of laws designed for victimless acts (aka personal choice) only hinders freedom and in fact creates a senseless string of victims as a side effect?

Never in the history of man has anyone, ever, died from marijuana. Even in studies involving lab animals that were given 100's of times more marijuana than a human could possibly intake, did they die. At any one time, 59,300 prisoners charged with or convicted of violating marijuana laws are behind bars. Of those, 17,000 are behind bars for possession ONLY, not trafficking. Enforcing marijuana laws costs an estimated $10-15 billion in direct costs alone. Not to mention the sustained costs of incarceration of the individual who has done nothing to harm anyone. It is estimated that the money spent enforcing useless marijuana laws is double what we spend on education in this country.

The prohibition of marijuana drives the black market for it. The laws that are in place to make it illegal actually CREATE CRIME by allowing criminals to profit from the underground, unregulated distribution. It in essence creates a monopoly for the ones willing to risk the cultivation. The exact same thing happened with the prohibition of alcohol in the early part of the 20th century. It allowed for organized crime to rise and prosper by supplying the demand for alcohol through underground transactions. The prohibition of alcohol was reversed and it was made legal again, so why hasn't this happened with marijuana?

Marinol is a pharmaceutical chemical drug produced by Solvay Pharmaceuticals Inc. It contains the exact molecular structure of the THC molecule and has the same effects of marijuana. However you cannot grow Marinol in your backyard. You cannot make obscene profits from the patent of a plant, because you cannot patent nature. The contradiction here is that you can make nature illegal, and then recreate nature in a lab using chemicals, put that illegal part of nature, available for profit, into a pill and make millions. Do you see the inconsistency here?

The hemp plant is quite possibly the most useful plant ever grown by mankind. There are literally hundreds of uses for the hemp plant ranging from paper to bio-fuel. The Declaration of Independence is written on hemp and is still in the same shape now as it was when the founders wrote on it over 200 years ago. Hemp is the strongest natural fiber known to man. Hemp hurds, the woody stalk, can be made into paper, fuels, and even plastics and far cleaner and safer for the environment than petroleum. Hemp would stop deforestation, provide renewable fuel, provide clean plastics, and highly nutrition foods. However, in the United States, you can purchase, import, export, wear, eat, sell, and use hemp, but it is completely illegal to grow. By the way industrialized hemp has no drug properties whatsoever, it CANNOT get you high. Does this make sense?

Marijuana has been proven over and over again NOT to cause any damage to brain, whatsoever. Never has anyone ever contracted lung cancer from marijuana smoking. It has benefits and uses that are extremely advantageous to mankind, from medicinal, to spiritual, to industrial, and it is ILLEGAL. We must ask ourselves why. Why, since the inception of the "war on drugs" has the prison system become privatized and increased almost 1000 percent? Why does this country have 5 percent of the world's population, and 25 percent of the world's prison population? Why is it legal for pharmaceutical companies to sell mind altering dangerous chemicals, yet we cannot grow a plant in our backyards? Why is it that cigarette related deaths top 400,000, pharmaceutical deaths top 100,000 annually, and they are completely legal, while marijuana has never ever ever killed anyone ever? Why?

-Matt Savoy - Domestic Terrorist


Annual Causes of Death in the United States

Tobacco 435,000
Poor Diet and Physical Inactivity 365,000
Alcohol 85,000
Microbial Agents 75,000
Toxic Agents 55,000
Motor Vehicle Crashes 26,347
Adverse Reactions to Prescription Drugs 32,000
Suicide 30,622
Incidents Involving Firearms 29,000
Homicide 20,308
Sexual Behaviors 20,000
All Illicit Drug Use, Direct and Indirect 17,000
Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Such As Aspirin 7,600
Marijuana 0

Doesn't it make complete since that marijuana is illegal?
UPDATE - 21 months ago
Please excuse the typos, as I wrote this post extremely fast.
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
21 months ago: Americans for SWAT Reform has the answer: http://www.swatreform.org/index.shtml
21 months ago: The problem I have with legalizing pot as well as the whole Marijuana vs alcohol argument is 1) As far as I know there is no test that can tell if a person has used the drug within the last few hours which makes me very uncomfortable when you think about the cab drivers and airline pilots that could be operating under the influence. 2) Most responsible people are capable of drinking socially. Not every person who drinks is drinking to get drunk, while every person who smoked marijuana is doing so specifically to get high. I may only be speaking for myself here when I say that I cannot deal with that many stupid people all at once.
THE RONBOT HUNTER
THE RONBOT HUNTER
21 months ago:
When you are taken prisoner, the Federal Government removes the funds estimated by your sentence from your Cusip Bond.

The Feds created a system to use you as a fictitious entity, with bonds that were sold as a negotiable instrument at the time of the creation of your birthday bond.

It is the same when you buy a house, the funds are removed immediately and the house was paid for.

But the Feds and banks never told you, that with your signature, you already paid for your own house.

Then they continued to rob you for the next 30 years.

When a soldier is killed, they take about 10 million or more from his cusip bond, and never give it to your family.

The Feds have made hundreds of trillions of dollars from us and we never saw a cent.

ActiveInChange from Lafayette, LA, has some of the facts, but since I am an expert on the scams and frauds of the Federal Government and the Godless Cult of Scientology, which are both associated and working as partners in crime.

I have access to what he yet lacks.

The Feds have exceeded their limits under the Constitution and have sold out our Country.

But pot, prisoners, soldiers and war issues are all part of the same scam, fraud and treason that we must learn about.

None are as blind as those that refuse to see what is right in front of them.

READ THIS AND PREPARE FOR WHAT IS COMING.

http://freedom-school.com/keating/how-a-...

I tell it like it is, I pull no punches, tell no lies, and I am as I am

THE ONE AND ONLY RONBOT HUNTER
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
21 months ago: Anyone ever notice that the US constitution says insure domestic tranquility? But all prohibition corrupts law enforcement. Seems inconsistent to me to expect corrupt people to insure domestic tranquility. I would say it's a recipe for disaster. 10,000 murders each year does not seem very tranquil.
ActiveInChange
ActiveInChange
Lafayette, LA
21 months ago: Chester that is an interesting link thanks.

Harshaw, who cares about being able to test for something. We are talking about personal responsibility here. It is already illegal to drive under the influence of any mind altering substance. You sound exactly like the societal controllers in DC. They act like it is somehow their responsibility to make sure no one does anything that they deem inappropriate. The lawmakers see marijuana as a problem and not the Federal Reserve monetizing debt creating a black hole of bankruptcy and deficits. It is completely backwards, if someone wants to freebase meth until they have a heart attack, by all means let them as long as no one else is harmed the rest of society should not care. This may sound harsh but as long as government steps in and defines right and wrong humanity will never have a chance because they will never learn the definition nor the act of, responsibility.

RONBOT I would be interested to know some information that you think I lack. I am always on the hunt for more information and value all sources, viable or not.

Endunemployment, what a great perspective. Creating a black market for anything is not at all tranquil. LEGALIZE FREEDOM!!!
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
21 months ago: "if someone wants to freebase meth until they have a heart attack, by all means let them as long as no one else is harmed"

and give citizens the right to take their drug-crazed self out. That's what is the problem. Personal responsibility will not go far to keep intoxicated drivers off the road, whether they be dope heads, alcoholics, or free basers.

How about this, we legalize all drugs, and if the drugs or alcohol contribute to an accident or another non-drug crime, we get to pull the intoxicated one into the street and rip them limb from limb.
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
21 months ago: I personally think that there should be facilities set up for chronic drug abusers and alcoholics, in which they can get an unlimited supply of the drug of his or her choice, where they cannot escape and cause harm to others. They will sooner than later kill themselves with the drug, and that particular defect will be eliminated from the gene pool. Five or six generations from now, the need to use drugs to be happy will be practically bred out of our species. Ten generations tops, I would think that drug abuse would be a thing of the past. I know it sounds harsh, but unleashing a horde of chemically altered zombies on the world would be much more expensive than the war on drugs ever was.
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
21 months ago: Prohibition didn't work too well for alcohol. The 18th amendment to the Constitution was the only one that regulated the behavior of the citizens and it was the only one that was repealed.

In California Weed may soon be legalized so taxes on it can help pay off the State deficit. Before prohibition most of the government revenue was from excise taxes mostly on alcohol. Now excise taxes are at record low, maybe excise taxes on Grass will help pay off our National Debt. It would also save money by not filling up courts and prisons with users while the serious criminals are released.
ActiveInChange
ActiveInChange
Lafayette, LA
21 months ago: OOTB, maybe you haven't heard but man has been using intoxicants for a few millennium and responsibly too. Maybe you have heard of Marco Polo. Yeah. He circumnavigated the entire globe all the while smoking hashish. The easterners have been using things that are illegal here for thousands of years as very effective medicines. I guess you think we should rely solely on the pharmaceutical company's chemical cocktails for our medicine because the government allows that. Not until government steps in and makes something illegal do people start using it in irresponsible manners. By the way creating irresponsible users is not the only thing that is created when the government outlaws drugs, they also create a monopoly for themselves. Are you familiar with Iran Contra and how the CIA funded black ops in south America with cocaine money that they made smuggling it into the US. This monopolistic money cartel would not have been possible if the government didn't create their own monopoly.

Altruist, I am glad that we have found something to agree upon.

ActiveInChange
ActiveInChange
Lafayette, LA
21 months ago: OOTB, do not get me wrong, I am not condoning drug use or abuse. I am simply stating the FACT that government trying to control it only creates more problems.

Example: Do you remember when crack was discovered on the streets? First of all not one single crack dealer on the streets has an airplane to go get the cocaine to make crack. It is flown into this country by the very people that make it illegal. DEA planes are constantly being found full of drugs by honest agents. Anyway when crack came out the government launched an ostensibly negative campaign against it but it was quite the opposite. Remember the news and the PSA's? They all beat the same message into society. CRACK IS STRONG AND CRACK IS CHEAP. It was an advertising campaign for their own imported product.

Why do you think we are protecting the poppy fields in Afghanistan right now? Before the US invaded they produced less than 10 percent of the world's opiate supply, now they produce 90 percent. This is not a coincidence. Our CIA deals drugs, plain and simple.
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
21 months ago: http://wings.buffalo.edu/aru/preprohibition.htm


As for Marco Polo, maybe you are speaking of Ferdinand Magellan. who was the first man credited with going around the world, over 200 years after Marco Polo was alive.

"Much of the current lore surrounding the Assassins (Hashshashan) roots from Marco Polo, who claimed to have visited Alamut in 1273 during his journey east (a visit widely considered fictional since the stronghold had been destroyed by the Mongols in 1256). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hashshashin

"Not until government steps in and makes something illegal do people start using it in irresponsible manners."

What? I know many, many people who legally buy alcohol every day, and get drunk and act irresponsibly. I know man, many people who get their prescriptions filled, and proceed to get bombed out of their gourds, while supposedly caring for their children, and driving on public thoroughfares.


Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
21 months ago: "DEA planes are constantly being found full of drugs by honest agents."

You do have documentation to back this up?
ActiveInChange
ActiveInChange
Lafayette, LA
21 months ago: OOTB, eeesh, I must apologize for my quick typing and mixed facts. I really did not mean to say that Marco Polo circumnavigated the globe. Doght!!!

Anyway here is a good story about a CIA drug plane filled with cocaine.
http://www.madcowprod.com/10092007.html

Here is another about the CIA paying the brother of Hamid Karzai, Ahmad, who is a known drug trafficker in Afghanistan.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/28/world/...

"I know many, many people who legally buy alcohol every day, and get drunk and act irresponsibly. "

When government steps in it creates the black market, which directly causes crime, which directly affects innocent people, REGARDLESS of whether or not the person committing the crime is on drugs or not. WAY more people died as a result of alcohol being illegal than it being legal. WAY more public servants can be corrupted when something like this is illegal.

The only point I am trying to get across with this article is that drugs and their users have been around for thousands of years. The interference of government in on these transactions breeds corruption and crime and irresponsibility. What is your solution? Outlawing everything? being a little overweight could be deemed dangerous too, maybe our diets should be monitored and regulated too. For that matter people get into accidents without being under the influence, maybe driving should only be allowed by government agents. Hell, maybe society should just be bussed to work and back home everyday and fed their government rations and pharmaceuticals. We should not question this godly state, for it truly knows what is best for us.

Can you see where I am going with this? I am not making fun, I am just giving my satirical representation of government intrusion into our lives.

Liberty is the mother of order, not the daughter.

Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
21 months ago: I can definitely see where you are coming from on this, and I partially agree. However, human nature being what it is, corruption is going to exist where ever laws exist, even if it is as simple as getting a cop buddy to fix a speeding ticket.

On the flip side of the coin you demonstrated, what would be your solution? Legalizing everything? Maybe some people like snort coke. Some people like to have sex after snorting coke. Some people, after snorting coke, might like to have sex in an elementary school parking lot. Maybe they could snort a line of coke off each other's bodies so they could go for hours. They aren't hurting anyone, and some of the school kids might actually enjoy watching it. For that matter, the kids that wanted to could join right in. Now that's liberty.

Now, as an intelligent person, you would think that no one today would fall for the tricks pulled in the early 20th century by the elixir companies, namely packaging opiates and narcotics in cure-alls. But not everyone is as learned as you, and half the people being churned out of our failed public education system couldn't read a label even if the ingredients were there. The reason for the Pure Food and Drug Act was the rising numbers of junkies during the snake oil era.

But in general, I think the laws should be reformed to more closely mirror our current state in the progression of our collective ability to handle mind altering substances. And I believe that marijuana laws should more closely resemble the laws in place for alcohol. No driving under the influence, no smoking in public, etc.
ActiveInChange
ActiveInChange
Lafayette, LA
21 months ago: OOTB, I can see that we have more common ground on this argument than we have different. I think that we just see human nature differently. Corruption, I believe, is only inherent in a populace when their leaders exhibit this corrupt premise. I think that true liberty, which has never existed, is the only answer to humanity's socalled "inherit corruption." I think that the founders, and I know they were flawed, were on to something when they came up with the constitution. It was the most evolved form of government that humanity has ever seen and because of that, it has led to a level of equality amongst humans that has never really existed. However since the inception of the "controllers" we are losing ground with this evolution and in fact devolving into a type of scientific serfdom or dictatorship.
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
21 months ago: "... true liberty, which has never existed, is the only answer to humanity's socalled "inherit corruption."..."

Ever since the first human that discovered, or reasoned, that he could hoard away a stock of food to get him through the lean times, or that he could simply take the food gotten by another, or that he could barter strength and protection for food and shelter, humans have not been truly free. When he discovered that a well placed club on his rival's head got him the best female, we were done with freedom. As long as we have a flesh and bone body that needs maintenance, we cannot be free. And I would dare to make the case that there have always been evil people and good people. Most laws are designed to protect the good people from the evil people, and some laws are designed to protect people from themselves. My opinions on the latter, at least where drugs are concerned, I have made known above.

What I see as paradox, or at least irony, is the sameness of ideals driving libertarianism and communism. They just operate from different ends of the equation.
ActiveInChange
ActiveInChange
Lafayette, LA
21 months ago: I see the same paradox, I have heard reasoning as to how Statists are similar to libertarians because they see the state as the people and this is self governing, etc. etc.

I am talking about something a little different here though. I am not talking about a governmental set of rules. I see the entire social fabric of man as corrupt but where I will disagree with most is that I believe that this societal corruption as being a learned behavior. Sure 10,000 years ago clubbing someone over the head for a chicken seemed logical. But now we as humans have worked past these certain instances of violence brought on through scarcity. Basically we have the ability right now to feed, cloth, and provide shelter for all of humanity but the learned culture of society prevents this. One must make a monetary profit and this is accomplished through fabricating a perceived scarcity. The very base on which our society operates breeds corruption. Take labor for instance, the employee tries to deceive the employer in order to get the most amount of money from the employer with the least amount of work. The employer tries to get the most amount of work out of the employee for the least amount of money. This is a foot stone for corruption and it is all brought on through scarcity. There is no need to horde if one can realize that scarcity in this modern age is a propagated falsehood designed to keep society reliant on corrupt government and multinational corporations. Thus the welfare warfare state.

Before I digress too much, I think that the way to progress humanity through this perceived "inherent" corruption or aberrant behavior is less laws, not more. Which is why I wrote the article.
THE RONBOT HUNTER
THE RONBOT HUNTER
21 months ago: ActiveInChange
Lafayette,

"RONBOT I would be interested to know some information that you think I lack. I am always on the hunt for more information and value all sources, viable or not."

By the way, the word "Ronbot" is an insult.

I am the Ronbot "HUNTER".

A dog catcher is not the dog--understand?

What I saw and have read so far, is that your knowledge in the way that this country is run under admiralty law upon the land, is not known to you.

Plus I think that you may be a Sovereign at heart, but have no knowledge of these issues.

We are both against corruption in Government, and both want less bad control from them.

You are a great writer and are doing a good job.

Looking forward to reading more.

I tell it like it is, I pull no punches, tell no lies, and I am as I am

THE ONE AND ONLY RONBOT HUNTER
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

http://freedom-school.com/keating/how-a-...

http://freedom-school.com/law/prison_tre...

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.