Economy

Rant

Left Behind

Posted 8 months ago|9 comments|225 views
From Movie Left Behind - World At War
Written by
Altruist
Eugene, OR
The most popular series of Christian books is by Tim LaHaye and Jerry B. Jenkins. The series of 11 books and 3 movies starts out with all of the virtuous being Raptured up into heaven. The remaining books are about the struggles between those who have been Born Again (the Tribulation Forces) and the forces of the AntiChrist.

There is no doubt that many on the right are inspired by this series. They probably see themselves as Christian soldiers fighting the forces of Obama who they see as the Anti Christ.

They imagine epic battles between virtuous red state forces with the Tea Party in the lead, and the Blue state forces with the government forces and the unions, doing the bidding of the evil one.

In this apocalyptic, end of days fairy tale, who do they think are the ones that are raptured up into heaven?

We live in a world of the haves and the have-nots. The richest 20% of the people in the country control 85% of the money and the other 80% have to scrape by on the other 15%.

They say that the recession ended a couple of years ago, but to make that determination they averaged how the rich are doing, and how the rest of the poor peons and serfs are doing. It is sort of like if you had a dozen homeless, unemployed people in a room, and Bill Gates walks in. Suddenly if you averaged their incomes, every person in the room would be a millionaire.

The rich are not suffering like the rest of us. They live in their own world of luxury and opulence. They don't have to work, they hire other people to do the work and the thinking for them. They don't have to worry about the housing crisis, they take advantage of it. When the poor loose their homes because they lost their jobs and can't make the payments, or they walk away from their long time home because they owe more on the mortgage than the house is worth, the rich snap up the resulting bargains. More than 30% of the homes purchased today are paid for with cash. That makes it harder for the rest of us to buy a house because the banks have tightened up the credit. http://newsgeni.us/?p=88441

The rich don't have to worry about health care, they can afford the best care in the world. They don't even have to worry about the law. They can hire the best lawyers and get away with murder. Not one person was arrested and charged for causing the economic meltdown.

The rich don't have to worry about paying taxes. They can afford to hire tax accountants to find all of the loopholes. They can squirrel their money away in offshore accounts. As much as $100 billion a year is stolen from the IRS this way and the rest of us have to pay more taxes to make up for this lost revenue. http://www.uspirg.org/home/reports/repor...

Fifty years ago the rich had a top tax rate of 91% of their income, and corporate taxes made up 20% of revenue. Now even if they don't cheat, the rich are only paying 16.6% of their income as taxes, and 2/3rds of the corporations pay no taxes at all. The burden of taxes has shifted to the middle class. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/con...

Money is power, and the rich and the corporations have changed the tax laws because they have all of the power. The rich own the media, the lawmakers and the judges. Now the decks are stacked so the rich can spend unlimited amounts of money to buy elections, or bribe politicians and they don't have to disclose anything. They were able to purchase an entire party which vowed never to raise taxes on the rich for any reason. They voted to make the Ryan Roadmap, the official budget plan of the Republican Party. This plan would lower taxes on the rich even more, which according to the non partisan Tax Policy Center, would shift the tax burden for the richest 1% from 25% down to 13.5%. The tax burden of bottom 80% of taxpayers would increase from 35% to 42%. http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/412046_...

The Christian church has been used for centuries to keep the poor in their place. The poor were told that their reward would be in heaven so they wouldn't try to overthrow their royal overlords.

Even though Jesus said that it was harder for a rich man to enter heaven than it was for a camel to fit through the eye of a needle, in today's looking glass world, up is down, black is white, and the rich are considered morally superior.

The rich are considered the virtuous, who will be raptured up into heaven, but perhaps because of Jesus's condemnation of the rich, they are not taking a chance on waiting for their rewards they are creating their own version of heaven, while the rest of us are left behind to suffer and fight over the spoils.
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
8 months ago: I really do not know why you think that only one party cuts the taxes for the rich?

Obama cut the estate tax - a tax paid by only a very few super-wealthy, massive estates - by $65 billion.

Actually, during his first term, Bush enacted tax cuts that reduced revenue for $474 billion ($574 billion in today's dollars). Obama managed to enact new tax cuts amounting to more than $900 billion from 2009 through 2012. It's close to double the size of the tax cuts in President Bush's first term.
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
8 months ago: YES, YES, YES!!!! Finally someone got it right.

"The rich ...don't have to work, they hire other people to do the work and the thinking for them."

That was Henry Ford's philosophy too, and when challenged on his lack of vocabulary and knowledge of the mundane aspects of his business.

"I don't know the answers because I do not need to clutter my head with the answers you seek. I hire smart young people from your schools who have memorized information that you think is intelligence. My job is to keep my head clear of such clutter and trivial facts so that I can think."

And besides, there are just as many rich atheists and Democrats as there are evangelicals and Republicans.
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
8 months ago: You are correct Dr. Darko Obama enacted more tax cuts than Bush did in an attempt to stop the economic decline and provide jobs. Much of that was because of pressure from the Republicans or as inducements for Republican support.

As I said, the rich have bribed and bought lawmakers on both sides of the isle. The "dozen members of the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction have accumulated altogether around $64 million in campaign contributions from special interest lobbyists during the last ten years; donations from legal firm lobbyists and Wall Street alone have totaled to around $42 million of those big bucks." http://rt.com/usa/news/super-committee-d...

The point is that Tax cuts are not working. The rich and the corporations already have lots of tax cuts, are sitting on $2 trillion in cash, and are not creating jobs.

The differences in the two parties is that the Democrats at least try to do something about the income inequality by targeting the tax cuts to those who need them the most. The Republicans target their tax cuts to the rich in the futile hope that they will start small businesses and hire people.

Obama has the right approach to the new tax cuts, instead of just throwing money at the rich, the tax cuts are targeted to small businesses and corporations that actually hire people.

It is time to hire people directly. Tax cuts do nothing to train and give education and experience to the chronically unemployed. It is time to do something like reinstating the WPA. It is time to help those Left Behind, to help themselves.
8 months ago: One question Al, did you even watch the Left Behind series?
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
8 months ago: I read a couple of the books then got bored.

The Austerity programs targeted just at the "Left Behind" in Europe, now appears to be dead. In Europe people took to the streets (and sometimes burned down districts) to bring this about. Europe is looking towards a Robin Hood tax on bankers and hedge fund managers to help their deficits, saying they caused the problem, they should help solve it. Britain is opposed but 80% of the English people are in favor. http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-st...

Perhaps the "Left Behind" here should visit the home of the "raptured" to get their message across. Oh They Are! http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/...
8 months ago: Which "Left Behind" books Al....
sunny2
sunny2
8 months ago: I don't believe any of the books cover more information than what you guys say. From the time I first voted, I knew the Republicans were for big business and the Democrats for the people. The only thing I go by anymore is what is happening globally.
It looks as if no one cares what happens to the people. Appears we are an afterthought. I don't like being used either. These people gain yardage and don't fight for the people once they get what they want. Everything will remain the same unless the Democrats mean what they say and are willing to fight. Talk is cheap. Looks like another battle ahead to preserve some of the entitlements, such as social security and medicare. The Republicans won't stop until they get what they want. Obama has a lot to do.
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
8 months ago: TB Left behind and Tribulation Force.

Sunny I think you are right. As long as they can filibuster and use hundreds of procedural hurdles to block and slow down everything, the Republicans can prove that government doesn't work.

The only way to get the government working for the people again is to change the legislative procedures so they are geared to get something done instead of being geared to continue the status quo as it is now.

The best way to do that, is to have a straight up and down vote on whether something needs to be done. Then at least three bills should be written up, one from the left one from the right, and one from independent experts selected for their knowledge of the issue at hand. Then preference voting would be used to record first (3 pts), second (2 pts.) and third priorities (1 pt.)

The one with the most points would win. Generally that would be the centrist (expert) bill, but as lawmakers got used to the process they would cooperate with the experts trying to get the best most popular parts into their bill.

Then what is best for the people would always win out and the cooperation would replace the deadly competition that we have now where winning (or making Obama loose) is more important than what is best for the nation.

It would mean a return to civility and a return of trust in government.
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
8 months ago: Republicans are for business, Democrats are for the government, both parties are for the rich and powerful.

Al, I don't follow your reasoning that the centrist position is necessarily the expert position. I also don't agree that the most popular course of action is the best. Doing what is most popular is not in the best interests of the people. That is why the country is not set up as a pure democracy , and instead is a democratic republic.

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.