News & Politics

Rant

Is the Truth Out There? What Motivates the Newsmakers

Posted 13 months ago|13 comments|431 views
Written by
Coloranter Raver
Denver, CO
Today, on a day when I raved about the FBI's new online, fully-searchable information data base with thousands of their files and field notes on every imaginable thing they've investigated in the past six decades or more (it's called The Vault) I thought it might make an interesting topic to write about a matter of concern especially based on reading so many comments posted on Rants and Raves over the past 24 hours since my return to the fold.

The topic is motivation. No not that which inspires us to exercise or commit to a goal, but rather that which encourages some people to put out information and others to subsequently buy into that information. Breaking it down, I contend that most informed adults are well aware that historically used car salesmen will tell a buyer what needs to be told in order to make the sale. This is not to say that any or even a large percent are slimy as the trite jokes maintain. Rather, this is to say that there are methods, some quite sophisticated, to tell people either what they want or need to hear in order to persuade them to do something or believe something that have been perfected by salespeople in general. In the information age, it seems important to recognize and understand the equivalency in that the members of the media are information salespeople. Now a used car salesperson's motivation for telling a potential buyer things that are 'true' about a particular vehicle is to close the deal and make his or her commission. Likewise, the motivation of a newscaster, reporter, or writer in the media has a similar motivation, to sell the information. Most tend not to notice or think about this because, especially in today's world where most news comes to our sphere via media source we perceive to be free. Are you paying to read this? Did you pay to watch the nightly news last evening? You may or may not have paid for yesterday's newspaper – if you did, congrats you are officially a dinosaur. Most of us are growing more and more used to getting our news from free sources. If you live long enough, you will know in no uncertain terms that nothing but the air we breathe and sunlight is free anymore, and there's little doubt someone will figure out how to charge us for those in the near future. All these 'free' sources of news and information are being funded by a variety of sources usually people trying to market products to us who pay for those tiny little ads on web sites, product placements in the background, and so on. Back in the "pay for a newspaper" days, journalists could honor their traditions and ethics more prominently because that was partly what people were buying when they bought the newspaper. In a free news world, however, there's a blurring of that responsibility visible in the growing propensity of broadcasters to drop cardinal rule of journalism number one when it comes to reporting the news and that is plain old objectivity and reluctance to editorialize. The levels of editorializing, however, has skyrocketed to the point of some networks putting on entire broadcasts that are nothing but the opinions of the people speaking. There is actually very little, if any, real news reporting. For older generations, this prompts confusion because they grew up in a world where when Walter Cronkite said something, it was a fact. He did not go on the evening news and state his opinions about matters, unless he made it very clear it was just his opinion. Today, however, time and again you will hear the daily newscasters tossing in their opinion about anything and everything. This is not the objective way to deliver the news. The very worst of it in print and online media comes in the form of sensationalistic headlines that are editorials in and of themselves designed to mislead and cause you to click to read. How many times have you been disappointed that the story did not deliver? But the online print media sites don't care, they just earned money because another page of their site was viewed. So, it goes to the point of motivation.

Motivation becomes the key to understanding what is happening in the world and opens a month's worth of rants and raves to be sure. When one receives information from somewhere, the first question should be is it true or not. The question should be who is motivated to give this information to me and why. The truth is there is no truth. In a corollary to Einstein's paradoxical law of special relativity, it turns out there is no such thing as truth. Truth is all a matter of perspective based on point of view. We like to think there is truth. Children are taught to tell it. The fact of the matter is it cannot be ascertained. However, motivation can be discerned. People are motivated to tell us one thing and withhold another for a reason. Discovering that reason is generally far more powerful than the whatever we do or do not believe to be the truth anyway.

Try it out on these questions...

(a) Why is Donald Trump motivated to spend his own money on a team of investigators to determine if Barack Obama was born in Hawai'i?

(b) Why is Scott Walker motivated to break the government unions in Wisconsin?

(c) Why is an Australian billionaire motivated to broadcast FOXNews to every home in America 24 hours a day 365 days a year?

(d) Why is the Westboro Baptist Church motivated to picket the funerals of American servicemen and women?

(e) Why is the GOP motivated to stop funding for women's health issues?

(f) Why was Fox motivated to help Glenn Beck move on?
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
13 months ago: Hello, my fellow liberal. I just have to say how refreshing it is to read a piece by someone who can see beyond all the clutter and misinformation, and see who is telling the truth and who is "selling" their so-called (FOX) news.

I tried it out on your questions above, and was shocked at the revelations.

(a) Why is Donald Trump motivated to spend his own money on a team of investigators to determine if Barack Obama was born in Hawai'i?

Because he obviously has a misplaced loyalty to this country, and regardless of how wonderful a president Obama is, if there is even the slightest chance that he was elected fraudulently, Trump wants him out of office. (That, and the fact it will score him some big brownie points with the birthers.)

(b) Why is Scott Walker motivated to break the government unions in Wisconsin?
Because he is a fascist pig who puts the welfare of the entire state above that of the hard-working teachers and public servants. He only managed to bust up their ability to bargain on benefits, though. They can still negotiate their own salaries and schedules. (See how reporting half the story comes into play here?)

(c) Why is an Australian billionaire motivated to broadcast FOXNews to every home in America 24 hours a day 365 days a year?

To make billions of his filthy dollars. Probably the same reason that Evan Montvel-Cohen, a Guam media executive, co-founded the liberal national radio network Air America.

(d) Why is the Westboro Baptist Church motivated to picket the funerals of American servicemen and women?

I hate to say it, but they are typical of the Democrat Party, to which they also belong. They are very vocal against anything they disagree with.

(e) Why is the GOP motivated to stop funding for women's health issues?

Only for Planned Parenthood, as far as this humble liberal can tell. Planned Parenthood has been implicated in ongoing criminal activities and fraud. As a responsible liberal, I would hope they are defunded until a thorough investigation and housecleaning has been implemented.

(f) Why was Fox motivated to help Glenn Beck move on?

Because they couldn't control him. He doesn't need FOXNews to get his hateful "truth" out there, unlike Olberman, who just faded away. Beck already has one of the most successful media ventures in Mercury Radio Productions, which will continue to work with FOXNews, according to Murdoch. But Beck is too much a loose cannon, and not in tune with the directives that are in place to bring about world peace through destruction and domination.

Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
13 months ago: Oh, I forgot part of (e)

"Women's health issues" and "abortion on demand" are not synonymous.
Coloranter Raver
Coloranter Raver
Denver, CO
13 months ago: OotB,
Oh! And here I thought the motivations were more basal and primal...
A, B, C, E, and F...are all for money and / or power.
D ... Plain old publicity.
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
13 months ago: You must be right. And I will sleep better tonight knowing it can all be simplified down to three things.
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
13 months ago: Basically it all comes down to one thing and that's power. Fame and fortune can both be parlayed.
Coloranter Raver
Coloranter Raver
Denver, CO
13 months ago: Bravo!
13 months ago: Jessie Jackson, Al Sharpton, Louis Farrakhan, The New Black Panthers? Did you miss those that are out to make money or do you just just consider them to be civic leaders?
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
13 months ago: Don't forget Al Gore, Ariana Huffington, Michael Moore, the Weather Underground, Code Pink, Time-Warner, and Gary Coleman. Ok, you can forget Gary Coleman.
13 months ago: Uh? Daily KOS, Move-On dot Org, Fact check dot org, Ted Turner and Bill Gates?
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
13 months ago: And don't forget Barack Obama. He had two books published (not saying that he actually wrote them) just prior to being swept into office. What was the motivation there? He had to have some of his own walking around money if he was going to hang out with the big boys.
13 months ago: ...and his Minions gobbled them up by the millions.....was that a prepayment plan?
13 months ago: minons huh? and you have recipts showing that or maybe just another educated guess?
Coloranter Raver
Coloranter Raver
Denver, CO
13 months ago: Actually, to refocus, I was not really attempting to reduce every motivation down to money and power, or simply power. I was trying to provoke genuine thoughts as to what motivates people to do what they do. This is partly because I've been around long enough, and not just debated enough on RR, I mean really around long enough to know that in these current times, if I write "Barack Obama is not responsible for the current US federal deficit" someone else will write, "Oh Yes he is." I can then post back all the facts from legitimate news sources and the General Accounting Office and be told, it's all liberal bias and the lamestream media.

I was trying to goad people into two acknowledgments:
(a) This is not a legitimate way, though it's the Sarah Palin / Newt Gingrich method du jour to debate. If you don't like a person's point, you have to counter it with a legitimate point not a meaningless sound bite (ergo lamestream media). In my example, above no one can provide facts that Barack Obama is responsible for the federal deficit because everyone knows the deficit has been growing for decades and began before he was born. Meanwhile, right and left-leaning information sources will all agree that George W. Bush contributed far more to the deficit than Obama has in equivalent periods in office. So, "lamestream media" becomes the counterpoint.
(b) If we cannot have legitimate styles of debate engaged here, and no one is willing to agree with anyone, maybe it's more useful and functional to analyze the motivations of people rather than even trying to get at the truth.

But, rather than that, instead, we have a whole bunch of people being summarized by greed.

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.