News & Politics

Rant

Is The Republican War On Democracy Racist?

Posted 12 months ago|11 comments|504 views
Written by
Altruist
Eugene, OR
Republicans don't care much for democracy. Talk about our democratic government and they will be quick to assert that we do not live in a Democracy – we live in a Republic. They have even made it a policy never to mention the Democratic Party or the Democratic Congress – it is the Democrat party, it is a Democrat Congress. It sounds weird but suddenly every Republican is told to mangle the language so people don't associate Democrats with Democracy.

But it is more than semantics, it is their actions that are most instructive. As soon as the Republicans took over most of the state houses and the House of Representatives they went about making it more difficult for people to vote. They were fortunate that the 10 year re-districting of Congress occurred right after they won the vast majority of House seats. To consolidate their wins they gerrymandered the districts, crowding the Democratic leaning voters into fewer districts and maximizing the Republican votes. They reapportioned the districts so that if the public vote was evenly split 50/50 that the Republicans would win 62% -77% of the House seats. http://www.carolinajournal.com/exclusive...

The next priority of the Republicans was to disenfranchise minorities, seniors and students with a plethora of voter ID laws, even though there is absolutely no evidence that there was any cheating. Is it just a coincidence that the 5 million people who would loose their votes when the voter ID laws go into effect are almost all Democratic constituencies? http://crooksandliars.com/karoli/many-5-...

Another high priority once the Republicans took over, was to tell women that they are not competent enough to make informed decisions about their own bodies or their own health. They want to eliminate Planned Parenthood the main source for health care for poor women, they want to restrict access to birth control so the women will be forced to remain barefoot and pregnant. They have passed laws forcing doctors to tell women lies and forcing women to have unnecessary trans vaginal ultrasounds and then to have to pay for that outrage. The white males in Congress know what is best for the women of this country. http://pol.moveon.org/waronwomen/

The most egregious example of the war on Democracy is what the Republicans have done in Michigan. They have enacted the Emergency Manager Law which allows the Governor to appoint someone that can take over all functions in a city and disband all elected officials. Is it a coincidence that the cities that have lost their democratic privileges all happen to be majority black cities? In fact the emergency manager law would disenfranchise 50% of the blacks in the state. A handful of Republican cronies with no prior training or expertise are deemed more knowledgeable than millions of citizens. http://eclectablog.com/2011/12/66-electe...

Of course everyone got pissed off. People tend to resent their liberties and democratic privileges being taken away from them. They demand the right to self governance just as our forefathers did when they rebelled against the English tyrant. The people of Michigan have an initiative process and if enough people sign a petition they should be allowed to put a stop to the emergency manager law and put it up for a state vote.

The citizens of Michigan submitted 40,000 more signatures than was required to get the question on the ballot, but the Republicans on the Board of Canvassers denied the petition because, - (are you ready for this?) – Because the font in the petition was too small!! http://www.politicususa.com/synder-michi...

So the biggest question is, are the Republicans disenfranchising mostly minority voters because these minorities mostly vote for Democrats, or are they simply trying to disenfranchise all Democrats? The question can also be asked about the President. Do the Republicans hate him so viscerally simply because he is a Democrat, even though he is competent, doing a good conservative job despite the Republican obstructionism and enacting mostly Republican policies, or is it because they can't stand the fact that their commander in chief, their ultimate boss, the one in charge of running the country, is black?

There are people all over the South who are living in abysmal conditions in extreme poverty, running the country creates cognitive dissonance. They consider themselves better than ANY black man, so how can a black man be president? That is why most conservatives in the South don't recognize President Obama as legitimate and that is why all of the bizarre theories that he is really Kenyan and a Muslim are believed by so many. It is racism.

and the only reason that they are not protesting and demanding better conditions, is that they say to themselves at least I'm a step up from the blacks. The fact that a black man is

EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
12 months ago: Al.
I hate to rain on your parade, but every democracy throughout all human history has failed.
Bar none.

I guess you knowitalls with nosmellypoop, will figure it out.

You appear very foolish.
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
12 months ago: Every government throughout all human history has failed. (except those still going) That is like saying everyone dies.

By the way do you know that Franklin and Jefferson got the idea for our democracy from the Iroquois nation. The longest continuous democracy in the world (800 years)? http://www.ratical.org/many_worlds/6Nati...

The fact is that as the entire world becomes more civilized there are more and more democracies. There seems to be a correlation between democracy and freedom, so I am confused why conservatives like Red are always whining about people taking away their freedom and yet they want to turn our democratic nation into an autocratic fascist oligarchy which would actually take away most of the freedoms we now enjoy. There are now 89 full democracies in the world and another 58 that claim to be democratic but actually give the people little freedom. there are only 47 nations left in the world that don't aspire to be a democracy http://democraticpeace.wordpress.com/200...

Perhaps it is because the rise of democracies also decrease violence and wars, and the conservatives are all bought off by the military industrial complex and want eternal war.

Red I love it when you call me names. That indicates that your ignorance leaves you with no rational argument to counter the article.
12 months ago: Uh...er... you're right Al about every government throughout human history has failed. Correct.

HOWEVER, that is why America was such a grand and remarkable experiment.

Why do you think in a mere 2 centuries America became the strongest and best country ever in human history?

The founding fathers knew there were people like Obama, FDR, Stalin, Mao (say Dung), Hitler, etc., and they built a REPUBLIC that controlled people like that from taking over.....so what did we do? We changed from away from a republic.

Had we kept those checks and balances, our country would still be spreading liberty and freedom around the world.

Alas, we screwed it up.

BTW, to reiterate, you and Siempre can kiss my lilly white you know what for saying I am a racist.

Capiche?
12 months ago: "Red I love it when you call me names. That indicates that your ignorance leaves you with no rational argument to counter the article."

Give this racist a break for crying out loud.
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
12 months ago: There is a big difference between a democracy and liberty. America was founded on the principle of Liberty, not Democracy.

Ben Franklin, whom you mentioned above, stated:

"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."

"When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic. "
12 months ago: Congress is already voting money, they have it printed as needed to cover what they vote on to do. Going to be a reckoning soon.

I'm with the lamb, stay well armed and contest that which curtails your freedom/liberty.
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
12 months ago: Franklin never said that "quote". Widely attributed to Franklin on the Internet, sometimes without the second sentence. It is not found in any of his known writings, and the word "lunch" is not known to have appeared anywhere in English literature until the 1820s, decades after his death. The phrasing itself has a very modern tone and the second sentence especially might not even be as old as the internet.
http://www.r8ny.com/blog/barry_popik/lun...

So our liberty is threatened if not already stolen by the corporations who now own Congress. Are you both ready to take up arms against the corporations to restore our liberty and once again make a government of, by and for the people instead of for the corporations?

"The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it comes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is fascism - ownership of government by an individual, by a group," FDR
12 months ago: FDR?!?

You might as well quote a tree donkey.
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
12 months ago: I don't know. FDR was the most popular president ever and was the only president elected 4 times.

Liberty is essentially equated to Democracy. You can have no freedom unless you have some control over your government. When you turn over voting rights to the corporations and the rich it is not a Republic or a Democracy any more. It is a Fascist Oligarchy.

I really don't understand why conservatives deny that we are and always were a democracy and that is what our founders intended, although they just intended the landed gentry to have any rights or freedom.

The definition for a Republic is: a state in which the supreme power rests in the body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by representatives chosen directly or indirectly by them, in which the head of government is not a monarch or other hereditary head of state.

Democracy is defined as: government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system.

It is obvious that we are both. We are a representative Democracy and since the Constitution is a living evolving document it has been amended to give more and more of it's citizens the right to participate. It has expanded the body of citizens entitled to vote to everyone over the age of 18. First the Common man under Jackson, then the Blacks under Lincoln, then the women under Wilson. Now the Republicans are trying to roll back our rights and take away our freedom. They want to take us back 150 years to where only the white male landed gentry have any rights. Denying people the right to vote is the same thing as denying their freedom because then they are taxed and governed without representation and that was what our revolution was all about. The Republicans are unpatriotic in that sense.

They are denying the rights of 5 million with the voter ID laws, another 5 million former prisoners that have done their time and should have their rights restored. No one knows how many other people are being denied their proper representation because of the gerrymandering that gives the Republicans undue advantages.
12 months ago: In my state the poll workers are required to ask the voter to show ID, the voter is not required to show one. If no ID is shown the voter is still allowed to vote a regular ballot UNLESS the voter log (list of reqistered voters) has a notation that ID must be shown (indicating that they registered without showing one or some other reason for requireing it). If the voter must show ID due to this notation and still does not show one, the voter is allowed to vote via a provisional ballot (paper) that will be verified when turned in at the end of regualr voting (as in that same day prior to tabulating the elections votes).

No one is denied the right to vote, they just might have to work a little harder by filling out a paper ballot. Of course this doesn't give a convicted person who has served thier time back the right to vote, that is not handled at my level (site captain/poll worker).

To my knowledge only one person has been denied the right to vote at my polling station in the last five years and that was before I became site captain and if I had known what was occuring, I would have personaly insure that that person was allowed to vote a standard ballot as they were properly registered but did not have ID on them. Many people want voters to be forced to show an ID to vote but this country does not have any law that says every person shall have an ID on them at all times and if I have anything to say about it, it never will.
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
12 months ago: Thanks for working to help people vote. I think that should be the emphasis - trying to get more people to the polls - not discouraging them by making them jump through all kinds of hoops.

There are many older people who have consistently voted every election year but this year they will be denied because they never had a birth certificate. http://www.commondreams.org/further/2012...

In Oregon voters are allowed to vote by mail and because it is so easy, participation is up about 10%, yet there is little or no fraud. There are many different ways that voter participation could be increased. Basically you should do the opposite of what the Republicans are doing. They don't want minorities or students to vote because they mostly vote for Democrats. http://www.commoncause.org/site/pp.asp?c...

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.