Economy

Rant

Financial Terrorists Enslaved US Via Debt Limit Increase

Posted 9 months ago|23 comments|356 views
Written by
Financial Terrorists Enslaved US Via Debt Limit Increase


President Obombasta, Speaker of the Louse Boner and Chairscam Bin Banky guaranteed the enslavement of American citizens via debt to the Federal Reserve when they secured a loan of 2.4 trillion dollars without tax-payer consent.

Americans will be forced to pay for the loan, but we were not allowed to vote on it.

The Federal Reserve charges interest to the United States government for permission to print fiat currency at the U.S. Treasury. Of course, tax-paying American citizens are forced to repay that interest in the form of interest on house loans, car loans, student loans, credit cards, etc, in addition to each citizen's silent obligation to repay the "loan" through income and property taxes.

Additionally, fees must be paid in the form of salaries and resources to print and catalogue the actual cash, which of course is funded with tax dollars.

Our whole system is based on little pieces of paper little more credible than the fake cash in a Monopoly game, all paid for by American tax dollars, with the profits going to the financial terrrorists who orchestrated the scam.

This double-dip tax and fee system has guaranteed that all present and future citizens of the United States are now financial slaves to the Federal Reserve for an indefinite period of time.

Welcome to white collar slavery. Welcome to blue collar shackles. Either way, it's indentured servitude for all.

American citizens were not allowed to vote on the borrowing of 2.4 trillion from an international banking cartel of financial terrorists that enjoy the slow genocide playing out before their greedy little eyes. The sick equations of the banking elite conclusively show that every civilian death equates to money in their already cash stuffed pockets.

Americans cannot own land without paying property/school/miscellanous taxes on federal, state and local levels. It is illegal to grow our own food. We cannot print our own local currencies. We cannot school our children how we see fit. Soon we will no longer be able to bear arms. Our freedom of speech is eroding daily.

Are we free?


Financial Terrorists Enslaved US Via Debt Limit Increase


Pastor Dinary
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
9 months ago: Pastor your ignorance continues to astound me!

The passage of the debt ceiling extension did not borrow $2.4 trillion. The agreement was to cut $2.4 from the budget over the next ten years.

What really did enslave the US is the Tea Party terrorists who held the entire debt ceiling extension hostage. The debt ceiling extension which prior to this was a normal bookkeeping process that had been done 77 times (17 from Reagan) was an entirely unnecessary Tea Party fabricated crisis. Because the Tea Party refused to consider any new revenue, S&P dropped our credit rating, because they realized that without new revenue it will be impossible to solve the debt problem. The credit downgrade will crash the stock market, increase interest on the national debt and increase the price of housing and a lot of other things.

This will make life a lot more expensive for everyone, slow down the economy, cost jobs, and the increase on the national Debt will increase the deficit and the debt by much more than what we are saving with the cuts.

So you are partially right but as usual you blame the wrong people (it was the Tea Party who are the Terrorists). And in addition you have shown that you don't have a clue about what is really happening.
9 months ago: Al.

Talking about astounding.

You are either a liar (which you are not) or a drone.

There were NO SPENDING CUTS. It was an accounting gimmick. They cut "GROWTH" in spending. THERE ARE NO CUTS!

EXCLAMATION POINT!


Gee wiz Al.
9 months ago: Riiiight just like they aren't new taxes only an end to the tax cuts. Who's zooming who.
9 months ago: Slim.

(Saw you on Blazing Saddles the other night. Hard shovel hit to the back of the head, huh?)

It ain't your money.

It is immoral to think you have the right to take people's hard earned money away from them.

Shame on you liberals.
Perfect Horizon
Perfect Horizon
Chicago, IL
9 months ago: Who are "you liberals", it does you no good to try and apply blanket statements simply because you have no true argument.

Who's morals are you talking about? I don't find it immoral to ask the extremely wealthy to pay more in taxes (I do find it wrong that we are all forced to pay an illegal income tax however).
9 months ago: Actually I think Blood Sucking Liberals would have been a better fit after seeing your happy to increase taxes on those that already pay. While not including the lower 50 percent to pay a small 3 percent.

Can't have it bothways bud.

You want to increase taxes on those that already pay taxes? Then increase taxes on those that pay NO taxes at the same time. You think that will fly?
9 months ago: Let me head off your reply with a guess.

They can't afford it.
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
9 months ago: Red is absolutely correct. If they did not borrow the 2.4 Trillion that the ceiling rose, they would not have had to raise the debt ceiling. And actually, the deal allows the ceiling to go up by $7 trillion over the next ten years.

When you are spending double what your predecessor spent, a spending freeze at current levels doesn't really do much to help the situation.
9 months ago: and Obama has put us in a new and different universe Al.

Perfect Horizon
Perfect Horizon
Chicago, IL
9 months ago: I find it interesting that Tea Party activists who are responsible for the debt deal also blame others for it...it was the Tea Party that fabricated the crisis so that they could look good (didn't work) and try and win the White House (1000% chance of not happening)...they want to have their cake and eat it too.
9 months ago: pefect

Did you say something?
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
9 months ago: PH

What were you doing when the government couldn't reach a budget back in 1995 and 1996? Were you at all worried about some gigantic crisis? Of course not, because the debt was at 62% of GDP, and it was just political ballyhoo that was holding up an agreement. Bill Clinton vetoed two bills saying they were too costly in the long run, and demanded better.

At present, the debt is around 103% of our GDP, drastically more than the 70% we had when Obama took office.

Of course S&P wants to make Republicans and the TEA Party look bad. It wants to make lowering taxes into something the people are against. They want more money to liberated from your savings so that it can fly home to them, via the government. What have we seen from $4 Trillion in government handouts over the past three years? Not squat.
9 months ago: Eating Pab while mommie washed the poop out of someones rear?
9 months ago: Hey Box? You think the S&P has not made out like a bandit during the 2 + trillion dollar loss in the last week? These people don't know who their friends are....
9 months ago: Albert. You spend 100 dollars last year..This year you auto increase your budget to 107 dollars but only spend 105...You just cut 2 dollars....

Is that not how the government rates its cuts? Somehow you can't see that you spent 5 percent more? Is it really that hard?
9 months ago: RED, let's see if they can figure this out.

You have a horse that you sell to your neighbor for 250,000.00 dollars
You the buy the horse back from your neighbor for 250,020.00 dollars

What is the value of your horse?

That is exactly what we are up against.
9 months ago: These liberals hate that they are losers despite their considering themselves the most enlightened and smartest people ever to breath oxygen. Liberals cannot accomplish anything. Losers.

Tagalongs in charge.

Man, are we in big, big, big trouble.
9 months ago: Enron at the government level. Federal jail time blues are a coming.
9 months ago: The Federal Regurge is the greatest joke ever played on the common man.

The Uncivil War did not end slavery. It made slavery mandatory for all races and creeds. They took away the shackles, and gave us paychecks.

Fiat currency is worthless.


Pastor Dinary
9 months ago: Sorry Pastor. Indentured Service was not considered then or now as Slavery.
9 months ago: There was absolutely no need for the United States to borrow 2.4 trillion dollars.

Ending the wars, cutting off all foreign aid and erasing the false debt that the US government pays to the Federal Regurge in the form of interest would have easily balanced the budget, with more than enough cash left over to sustain and stimulate our own economy.


Pastor Dinary
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
9 months ago: I would be okay with leaving the foreign aid in place. It's such a small percentage of our budget we wouldn't even notice it. ($50 billion/year) I would be even more okay with cutting off the foreign aid that we spend here at home. If they want US aid, they need to go back out, and come in the right way.

To pay the bank a half trillion in interest every year IS preposterous, and those bankers need to tarred and feathered, and run out on a rail. Along with all those who just made it possible for us to pay even more each year in wasted dollars.

I also agree it's time to get out of Afghanistan, Libya, and Iraq. But at only $123 billion per year, that's not really much in savings either. Consider that we paid $413 billion in interest payments last year.

So to recap:

Interest payments:................ $413 billion and rising
Foreign aid payments:............ $50 billion
Three wars:............................$123 billion

Adjusted deficit after applying suggested cuts : Still $1 Trillion short.
9 months ago: Out Of The Box,

Cut all federal salaries to $50,000 per year and demand repayment of the Bank Bailouts from the CEO's who received ridiculous salaries/bonuses since 2008, and I'm sure that the trillion short will become a trillion surplus.


Pastor Dinary

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.