News & Politics

Rant

Dirty Energy, Dirtier Tricks

Posted 34 months ago|10 comments|706 views
Written by
JAK Gladney
Saint Albans, WV
Lloyd Bentsen is usually credited with coining the expression “astroturf lobbying”—synthetic, industry-created and/or funded citizens groups meant to mimic genuine grassroots advocacy. Astroturf groups dot today’s political landscape like kudzu (or, for a more West Virginia-flavored analogy, the satellite dish), and a number of public relations firms—like the Bivings Group and Bonner & Associates—specialize in more or less full-time astroturf creation.

As reported in Charlottesville, Virginia’s Daily Progress, U.S. Rep. Tom Perriello has reported receiving “at least” six letters from constituents representing local chapters of national minority organizations, each claiming opposition to Perriello’s vote on the American Clean Energy and Security Act (seeing mountaintop removal as a threat to the scenic beauty of his district, and thus a threat to tourism dollars, Perriello is no friend of coal) . The letters have all been confirmed as forgeries and a partner with Bonner & Associates, Gwynn Geiger Hegyi, has formally apologized to one of those groups (I thought about writing “claimed responsibility”—a phrase usually reserved for acts of terrorism. Is an act meant to deceive on an issue vital to job growth in minority communities substantively less villainous?).

Members of Creciendo Juntos, a nonprofit that advocates on behalf of Charlottesville’s Latino community, reported that their organization’s logo, address and name were used without authorization in a letter purportedly written by “Marisse K. Acevado, Asst Member Coordinator”. No such person or position at Creciendo Juntos exists.

Perriello staffers thought the wording of the Creciendo Juntos forgery looked familiar, and located five other similarly-worded letters—this batch originating with the Albemarle-Charlottesville branch of the NAACP. They contacted M. Rick Turner, president of the local NAACP chapter. Turner confirmed that none of the five people who had signed the letters could be found on the chapter’s roster.

Tim Freilich, who sits on the executive committee of Creciendo Juntos, made a point that’s worth reiterating and enlarging: “It’s this type of activity that undermines Americans’ faith in democracy.” In an era of push-polling, town hall guerilla warfare, and instantaneous feedback (tweet-tweet), activities like this further erode a politician’s confidence in authentic, thoughtful dialog with their constituents. Beyond that, it’s misrepresentative: both the NAACP and influential Hispanic civic engagement groups, like Democracia Ahora, support ACES.

Building on the fictions of "clean coal" and the National Black Chamber of Commerce as a representative minority voice, this is just another day's work for dirty energy. Or maybe astroturf needs "fertilizer", too.

(Copies of the five letters are available through my second link.)
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
34 months ago: And how widespread is this expose?
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
34 months ago: I know what you mean. It makes it hard to trust anyone. Just like the so-called "Killian documents" presented to the nation by CBS's Dan Rather as authentic, and were later assumed by independent analysis to be forgeries.

Atta-boys are in order to Perriello for catching this, and actually caring enough to pay attention, or at least for hiring quality staff who pay attention.

It raises the question though, would they have been as apt if the letters in question had been submitted with the opposite sentiment, and were in favor of his vote?
JAK Gladney
JAK Gladney
Saint Albans, WV
34 months ago: Apparently, the people at Creciendo Juntos notified Perriello's office (I'm still unsure how this letter came to Creciendo Juntos' attention), raising the alarm. I wonder how far-reaching this letter-writing campaign really is.

From the Bonner & Associates website:

http://www.bonnerandassociates.com/grassroots.htm

This amazes me. They're not in the least bit shy about astroturfing--they own up to not being in the least bit spontaneous or community-directed, like traditional grassroots campaigns. The people they represent aren't cash poor, like traditional grassroots campaigns. And for a fee they'll build the illusion of a spontaneous, broadly-based community action group "to help their clients win."

It's a dangerous game: lending credibility to an argument through citizen front groups; but only dangerous if you're discovered and your con is widely publicized. The two astroturf PR firms listed in the article are the tip of the iceberg--there are about a dozen listed on the SourceWatch site alone, each serving a particular industry/interest.

Another case of reality, scripted.
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
34 months ago: Wow, and the possibilities are endless, the scenarios unlimited. Double agents, misinformation, intentional causing of distrust of everyone. The battle lines are getting more obscure everyday.
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
34 months ago: JAK, I just noticed your wording.

"Is an act meant to deceive on an issue vital to job growth in minority communities substantively less villainous?"

Why is the word "minority" used here? Wouldn't that sentiment apply to any community?

Forgive my politically incorrect ignorance, and I'm not trying to be facetious, and I probably won't respond to your explanation, I was just wondering.
34 months ago: Maybe if these politicians want "authentic communication" with their constituents, they should pull themselves out of their cushy Washington Offices and actually go out and talk to them face to face.
JAK Gladney
JAK Gladney
Saint Albans, WV
34 months ago: It would apply to any community, OOTB. I use the term "minority" because, in this specific case, these forgeries represent (misrepresent?) minority concerns. I don't mean to suggest that this is directed exclusively against racial/ethnic minorities.

In a similar case (2006), Bonner & Associates, on Pfizer's dime, created a senior front group--the "60 Plus Association"-- to oppose prescription drug legislation.

Some are better at concealing their astroturfing origins than others--and, admittedly, it's hard to differentiate blatant business/citizen coalitions from those that are, by design, front groups ("Friends of Coal" is one such example--I think their industry roots, and dependence on heavy industry patronage, are obvious, but there are probably some who still see this as a mostly organic community action group, and irrelevant if not for their donations in dollars and time). They all thrive in this twilight.
JAK Gladney
JAK Gladney
Saint Albans, WV
34 months ago: Links appear broken, so try:

http://www2.dailyprogress.com/cdp/news/local/local_govtpolitics/article/letters_sent_to_perriello_called_fakes._area_advocates_names_forged_by_d.c./43439/

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/documents/2009/07/astroturfing-fake-creciendo-juntos-anti-cap-and-trade-letter.php?page=1

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Portal:Front_groups

Full disclosure on this third link: SourceWatch is a project of the Center for Media and Democracy, which is generally promoted by left-leaning sources (though I wouldn't necessarily call SourceWatch "biased" left--I do see entries for front groups tied to Obama administration officials--like CORE--and much of the content is user-generated). Make of that what you will.
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
34 months ago: Thanks for the article, JAK. Very informative post. I naturally had to do some digging, and found out it's pretty much accepted as politics-as-usual nowadays, as long as the desired result fits whichever group sponsored it. Seems like it should construed as fraud, and punishable by law, no matter who is doing it.

http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/194057.php

http://www.24thstate.com/2009/07/firedup-doesnt-understand-the-meaning-of-astroturf.html

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Students_for_Academic_Freedom

http://www.opinionjournal.com/diary/?id=110006449

The last link is from way back in 2005
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
33 months ago: Americans for Stable Quality Care

"The official provides a little more back story: “These groups were part of a looser coalition that started back in January that focused on the links between health reform and the economy. Now that the debate is turning on what health reform means for the individual, they felt the need to launch a new front that addresses some of those particulars while debunking some of the myths that are floating around. Plus, these groups recognize that their collective voice packs more punch than if they were to just speak out individually.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/26076.html#ixzz0OHrqRicR

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.