Offbeat

Rant

Church Fined: Sin Against Mother Nature?

Posted 11 months ago|8 comments|558 views
Written by
The church was fined $100 per branch cut for excessive pruning, bringing the violation to $4,000. "I just couldn't believe it when I heard about it," Sales said. "We trim our trees back every three years all over our property, and this is the first time we have been fined."
http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2011/05...%29

I guess "The Land of the Free" ...doesn't apply to Church property, that is one way to get them taxes! Makes you want to think twice before you plant a tree... if pruning the same will cost you $100 per branch! The city of Charlotte has it figured out... no need to take up an offering when they are short of cash... just hit a few unsuspecting churches... it's like robbing a bank, only difference is this is legal?!?

Is this a case of saving the trees or is it something a bit more? Could it be that some people like the idea of separating Church and State... until the bureaucratic wheels don't get greased. It would seem that the city of Charlotte Land Development Division likes putting the "green" thumb on this local Church... green being the operative word!

To the city of Charlotte... money apparently does grow on trees...
...and they all seem to be located at Albemarle Road Presbyterian Church !:]

UPDATE - 1 month ago
"Don't Waste Your Life" by John Piper
http://dwynrhh6bluza.cloudfront.net/reso...
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
11 months ago: It"s Botany I tell you... BOTANY !:]
11 months ago: There will be more to the story because most of us who have trees on our property can prune, remove or plant new trees. But in some communities,with some trees, the city had decreed them to be of special significance, sometimes of historical significance. These are lawfully constrained situations and the tree owners are informed.
BadCyborg
BadCyborg
San Antonio, TX
11 months ago: That's nothing. I was watching an episode of "This Old House" recently and the homeowner and landscaper were looking at the rear of the property with an eye towards landscaping. They were walking through the area and the landscaper was pointing out various protected plants the local conservation society would not let them remove. Among the "sacred" plants was poison ivy. That's right. They were not allowed to remove the poison ivy from their property. Didn't matter that they had children. Didn't matter that they owned the property outright. The local conservation society would not let them get rid of the health hazard.

Property rights are the most fundamental of all rights. I have seen freedom defined as being what you can do without having to get permission. In that town you could not get permission to remove a plant that presents a clear and present danger (life threatening to some folks) to many species including humans.

Land of the free and home of the brave - says so right here on the label.
BadCyborg
BadCyborg
San Antonio, TX
11 months ago: I don't know what trees exactly the church "over-pruned" but the fellow in the photo is standing with what looks like crepe myrtles. I wasn't aware you COULD over prune them. My wife pruned the one in our front yard back to a single twig sticking out from a bunch of truncated limbs and it fairly exploded with new growth this spring.

But maybe it is just a tax issue. City wants revenue. I'd be interested to see how many times that ordinance had been applied against private property owners.
11 months ago: BC,

Good point!
11 months ago: That is not a tree. I'm sure the "The city of Charlotte" does not prune its crape myrtles. Yeah right. Does that mean the "The city of Charlotte" will refund the taxpayers for every city owned crape myrtle stem they prune?

Uh. Crape Myrtles can become trees if allowed to grow from the initial planting.
For the most part they are landscaped into blooming above ground bushes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagerstroem...

The city of Charlotte must now attack those that trim their Azaleas for better flower production next year.
BadCyborg
BadCyborg
San Antonio, TX
11 months ago: You are 100% correct. Crepe Myrtles generally make bushes although they can be trimmed to look very like a tree (one of my neighbors has a couple over 20' tall).

The point here is that the State is stepping in to control what the erstwhile property owners do with their property. The real point here is that we are NOT the owners of "our" property. The government (usually municipality) is the true owner. If you do not believe me, miss your annual lease payment (AKA property tax payment) and see how fast the true owner of the property steps in to repossess.
11 months ago: BINGO!

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.