Economy

Rant

Boeing Would Be Right To Leave WA

Posted 31 months ago|4 comments|1,265 views
Written by
Alex Layton
 Administrator
Puyallup, WA
Last week, Boeing purchased a plant from Vought Aircraft Industries, in South Carolina, that has been building rear fuselages for the companies 787. Many in Washington feared this meant that the company was setting the groundwork to leave Washington State. Those fears only escalated when the company effectively issued an ultimatum, saying they had not decided on a final location for their second fuselage plant, but their decision would be dependent on the machinists union agreeing to a no-strike clause in their next contract.

Washington lawmakers are doing what they can to mediate between the two, but it looks as if Boeing will not be budging on this one. The machinists have struck in 4 of the last 7 opportunities, including a two-month ordeal, this past winter.

As an outsider looking in (I have not affiliations with either Boeing, or anyone in the unions), it has always seemed that Boeing has bent over backwards to satisfy the demands of the union, while the union always is screaming for more. Last time they struck, I remember someone on the picket line bragging that each day of the strike will cost Boeing $100 million in sales and 1 cent per share in profit. On top of that, they were trying to get out a new airliner that is already years behind schedule, which has lead to a number of companies cancelling their orders.

I know the job of a union is to get more money and benefits for their members, but they didn’t seem to care that the entire economy was crashing. Why should they be immune? Why was an 11% annual raise insufficient? Why should they be unwilling to pay for a portion of their health benefits? Guess what? The economy is down. You should have been happy just having a job.

The whole mentality of the Boeing machinists union is displayed by the statue outside their headquarters (see the post’s picture). The statue depicts workers striking (not working).

So now, Boeing is tired of all the strikes and is threatening to leave. I can’t blame them. How efficient can your company be, if every 3-4 years, your employees stop coming to work for months at a time? The question then becomes, how stubborn are the machinist unions going to be? Will they refuse to work, and lose their jobs? Will they try to sue and lose their jobs? Only if they’re fools. I hope Boeing stays. The loss of Boeing would be a horrible loss for Western WA, but I don’t think I could blame them, if they did.
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
31 months ago: Strange how Boeing is moving to 'Right to Work' states.
I have to wonder if this is the beginning of the corporate avalanche.

Does anyone know how to stop an avalanche?
Alex Layton
Alex Layton
 Administrator
Puyallup, WA
31 months ago: I believe you preemptively fire a cannon at it.
31 months ago: This is a great topic Alex and one that has touched a nerve in me also over the years. I am not necessarily "anti-union" as I realize there have been and likely still will be companies which do not treat they're employees fairly. However in this case and others I have seen it is the Union's which are "bullying" the companies into outrageous contracts which as in the case of the auto industry leaves no capital slack for when times get tough. This to me is also unfair and in the case of the auto workers the American taxpayer is paying the price for all those years of "overindulgence" by the UAW. Will America ever get paid back for bailing them out? I don't think so and it is my opinion much of the bailout money has or will soon be written off by this administration. Great job Alex.
Rudi Stettner
Rudi Stettner
 Moderator
31 months ago: Your post reminds me of when I was living in Italy back in the 70's. My father was managing a factory which by law had to have a union. The union was hand in glove with the Communist Party. I state this not in a red baiting manner but as a statement of fact. Back then the Communists were the #2 party in Italy. My father found the eternat succession of strikes as maddenly detrimental to both the owners and the factory workers. He got along very well with the shop stewards. He worked very hard to develop a partnership rather than an adversarial relationship, but he was up against a political view of society that locked workers and bosses into an adversarial role. You state the problem faced by Boeing very well. Because of my father's talk at the dinner table I am very familiar with such dilemnas. Adversarial class relations are the scourge of society, even in free societies such as ours. Thank you for stating bluntly the damage that could result if the unions persist in their folly. The article was a blast from my past. Although I was a lunatic leftist as a teenager, the seeds of doubt my father planted in my mind about my political philosophy bore fruit yearss later. Thanks for a great article.

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.