News & Politics

Rant

Barack Obama's War On FOX News Panned

Posted 31 months ago|11 comments|637 views
VIDEOS
Written by
As critics continue to hammer Barack Obama for an "unbecoming" assault on FOX News Channel (see embedded video) that is drawing comparisons to Hugo Chavez' Venezuelan dictatorship, there appears to be another Nixonian element which has entered the picture: The cover-up.

Based upon a Talking Points Memo story which appears to have been subsequently picked-up by the Associated Press (see first link), it seems as though Obama's Treasury Department may have made at least one false claim in an attempt to paper-over the very public humiliation Team Obama suffered when the press pool flatly rebuked the attempt to exclude FOX News Channel from interviewing Pay Czar Kenneth Feinberg.

Serious questions arise from the botched Talking Points Memo story.

* Is the "low level Treasury staffer" being made a scapegoat for a failed Obama media power play? In light of Talking Points Memo's apparently false story, this concern emerges. This episode smacks of the National Endowment for the Arts scandal involving Yosi Sergant and Valerie Jarrett's Office of Public Engagement.

In that instance, Sergant was forced out of the NEA after damning audio surfaced which seemed to suggest that the White House's emissaries were on board with an apparent effort to turn the NEA into a propaganda arm of the Obama administration. Though Sergant was the party caught red-handed, many people believe that his efforts in that matter were, at the very least, approved of higher up the administrative chain.

* Why did Talking Points Memo (TPM), and then the AP, run what appears to be a false story? Was TPM itself scammed by the "low level Treasury staffer" or the White House? How much does this episode stain the credibility of TPM, and even the AP?

Obama has lost his War On FOX News. If that was not clear previously, then these cover-up efforts certainly clarify the point. That is, you do not seek to choose fall guys and obfuscate an engagment which has proven successful. The clumsily mishandled Pay Czar interview power play does not fit into this category.

It bears watching the reactions from both the AP and TPM to their discredited stories. If these organizations come out to defend their reputations and reporting on this matter, it's a sure sign they feel that the Obama Administration was playing games with them on this story.

If, on the other hand, the two disgraced units do not speak up after being so apparently exposed, then the conclusion likely becomes they were willing participants in an effort to deceifully minimize the public relations damage done to Barack Obama because of his failed war on FOX News.

All of which leads us back to the starting point of this fracas. If a good portion of the press cannot be counted upon to accurately represent the goings-on of the current administration, then FOX News' worth as an Obama watchdog is only that much more obvious.

Team Obama may not appreciate Glenn Beck lampooning The Chicago Way (see 2nd and 3rd links), but millions of Americans rely on Beck and his FOX brethren to provide them with a perspective on the Obama Administration which, for one reason or another, appears to consistently elude the rest of the "mainstream media."
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
31 months ago: I would hope that the mainstream media reacted the way it did concerning Fox with a sense of constitutional free speech and freedom of the press. However, observing their track record of what they report and how they report it, I am reminded of Emelio saying to Mr Deeds, "I am very very sneaky, sir."
I think I'll still keep an eye on them, before I rush to any judgment, good or bad.
31 months ago: Right now they're just trying to spin it, giving qualifications and the like. This is why the media is a joke and FOX is absolutely critical.
31 months ago: I just cut a short video on the subject:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXvwJGHRZqY
DelTheDad
DelTheDad
Beaverton, OR
31 months ago: Here we go again...

Hey all check this out:
http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/cobb/p_courses/ps411/assigned%20readings/kull%20ramsey%20and%20lewis%20misperceptions%20iraq%20PRQ.pdf

Its is big read but scroll through it. This is a study on how FOX news duped the mass...It is not a one sided report. It actually is on major news networks. Very interesting information.
31 months ago: edu/gov/seiu/acorn/pub/soc/abc/nbc/cbs/pbs/npr/...
Yeah, more elitist whitepapers worthy of being glorified toilet paper. Listed as a "MUST" read.
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
31 months ago: Del
Once again you are way off topic. This isn't about Fox or ABC or CBS or NBC or CNN putting their slant on a particular agenda. This is about the President of the United States trying to dictate who gets in to receive the Holy Communion of the Talking Point.
Now that it seems like the White House was rebuffed by the faithful minions, those minions will have to scurry to get back in good graces with the Holy O, before the next communion comes to pass.

I would suggest to them the reciting of twenty Hail Mary Mapes s, and ten Our Rather s.
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
31 months ago: Not to let you sidetrack the discussion here, but to inform you and others you wish to deceive.

The preemptive strikes against Iraq ordered by Bill Clinton were justified in his mind also.

Bill Clinton, December 16, 1998

" Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.

Their purpose is to protect the national interest of the United States, and indeed the interests of people throughout the Middle East and around the world.

Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons. "

Read the entire address at
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html

Then we'll talk.
JAK Gladney
JAK Gladney
Saint Albans, WV
31 months ago: Starting to hear an echo here at RR.

I know we all love a good conspiracy, all protective of the RNC's Ministry of Information--but let's be serious.

As raised by others, does anyone remember the MSM rallying around the New York Times or NBC News, when the Bush White House openly warred against them? Or of any sustained outrage when it was discovered that the last admin. had right-wing hacks pass fan pieces for real reporting in Iraq? When the White House gave press credentials to a right-wing male escort? Of course not. Because, as every progressive has long know, the MSM doesn't do analysis particularly well, and the news divisions resemble the entertainment divisions to such an extent that they can no longer tell the difference (and probably admire Fox's beating them to the punch on that trend). It's all about political tactics, give-and-take drama. Lame, corporatist and always desirous of staying in the good graces of Beltway culture. There's your "mainstream media."

So yes: again, let's hear it for the MSM's defense of Fox. The president acknowledges the obvious: that Fox News, like Voltaire's Holy Roman Empire, "is neither": neither sly, nor a media outlet. Sock Obama for not playing along, as the MSM has since Fox's inception.

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.