Health

Rant

Baby Isaiah May's Legal Fight For Life

Posted 7 months ago|12 comments|2,286 views
VIDEOS
Written by
Rudi Stettner
 Moderator
There is a world full of developed nations who have for years had a single payer health care system such as the one Americans have been discussing since Obama became President. It is a complex issue. Many Americans are already covered. A significant number are not. We are a leader in research and development. For those who have health insurance, delivery of services is quick and efficient. There are too many people who are not covered. But destroying the system we have could make things difficult for everyone.

One of the thorniest issues is that of rationing health care, of deciding when doctors should walk away from a living patient. The Canadian courts and medical bureaucracy are dealing with just such a situation.

Isaiah James May is a baby boy whose continued survival is at the center of a battle between his parents and Canada's medical bureaucracy. When he was born on October 24, 2009, his umbilical cord was wrapped around his neck, depriving his brain of oxygen. World Net Daily quotes as follows the letter from the Alberta Health Services in which they gave their reasons for terminating life support.


"There is no hope of recovery for Isaiah," reads a letter from Alberta Health Services delivered to Isaiah's parents and dated one week before the health care system intended to pull the plug on the baby it has determined irreparably brain damaged.

"Your treating physicians regretfully have come to the conclusion that withdrawal of active treatment is medically reasonable, ethically responsible and appropriate," the letter states. "We must put the interests of your son foremost, and it is in his best interests to discontinue mechanical ventilation support."




The parents, Isaac and Rebecca May promptly appealed the deadline, citing developmental milestones reached by Isaiah such as pupil dilation, opening his eyes and moving his limbs. He has defied predictions by gaining weight and growing. Mr. and Mrs. May took their son's case to Canada's courts. They have until January 27 to appear in court with an independent expert who will deliver a report of Isaiah May's prognosis. This report will determine whether or not Isaiah receives continued life support.

The parents had sought a 90 day reprieve. Alberta Health Services wanted to wrap up a decision in 30 days. Isaiah has defied predictions that he would never urinate, grow or even live past 3 days. The parents are praying for continued miracles and continued divine intervention.

Every society makes displays of its commitment to core values. A statue in the park, a light display on a government office building and national holidays commemorate everything from the founding of a nation to its war dead, from its workers to its feelings of gratitude to G-d.

A core value that separates modern nations from Sparta and from Pol Pot's Cambodia is the idea that a human being is more than a profit loss statement. Civil law is predicated upon the belief that our lives are entrusted to us but do not totally belong to us. That belief inspires the prohibition in most jurisdictions against committing suicide.

There is something profoundly dehumanising about sitting in judgement over the value of a life. It reduces a human life to the level of a corporation being dissolved in bankruptcy court. There is a malignant temptation in human nature to view those of lesser means and abilities as children of a lesser god. This ultimately demeans us all.

The border between the disabled and the dependent is not a towering wall. Every day, those of us who are robust and healthy slip past the border separating those who are healthy and economically productive from those who are disabled and incapable of being economically productive. Indeed, the traffic sometimes goes in both directions. There have been miraculous recoveries from vegetative states. The presence of hope from knowing that we do not know everything keeps us humble and protects us from despair.

Everyone should be encouraged to fight death as long as they wish to do so. To cling to life and the hope that it will be good is a primal urge. It is an illusion to believe that those who cling in the face of diminished hope are taking from the rest of us. To the contrary, they are enduring that the times of our lives that are racked with pain and infirmity will have dignity and meaning.

The Mays deserve our prayers, encouragement and support. Theirs is a battle for hope and for a future for their son. It is ultimately a battle that we will all face. In encouraging them, we are giving solace to those who in the future will fight for life against daunting odds. A life is not a profit loss statement. It is a gift on loan from G-d. If we lose sight of that, we are all diminished.


Reprinted with permission from Magdeburgerjoe.com


This article has been written by Rudi Stettner of the Winter Riders Group. Those who wish to support the Winter Riders Group can do so by shopping at Rudi Stettner's Amazon store, the link to which is provided below. (First link on the list) I thank you for your interest and support.


EMAIL| SHARE|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
TheLegendTomWing
TheLegendTomWing
 Moderator
Havertown, PA
7 months ago: It's pretty scary when you have some bean-counting bureaucrat who "knows what's best" for your child.
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
7 months ago: The same decisions are made in this country only the bean counters are insurance company flacks. Or the family might be one of the 40 million with no insurance at all.

They could take their baby to the emergency room and the baby would be cared for, for a while, but I have seen videos of patients that are unhooked from their monitors and tubes and thrown out on the streets because they have no insurance.

I have friends who's premature baby had problems and the oxygen fried her partially formed lungs. The baby died and the parents lost their home and had hundreds of thousands of debt. That wouldn't have happened in Canada.

70% of Canadians are happy with their countries health care although they do have some problems they are working on. When asked if they want to switch to a system like ours 90% say they prefer their system to America's.
Rudi Stettner
Rudi Stettner
 Moderator
7 months ago: I have also witnessed "bean counter" battles with private insurance companies. The problem with Isaiah May could well happen under the American system. But it did happen in Canada. This mentality has to be fought whether it is in the context of "managed health care" or socialised medicine.
Theresa
Theresa
Canada
7 months ago: I as a Canadian would like to know where you receive your statistics from? To say that 90% of us prefer our health care system to the Americans is from what I guess hopped up propaganda! It should not surprise me though with the current debate that is happening in the United States that these kind of stats are floating around. For years MY country has been losing our Doctors and Nurses to the United States. I for one know of three family that have had to go to the United States for proper medical care (2 with cancer and 1 with arthritis) because the services where not offered here (aka not paid for). They had to pay out of their own taxes to have "universal" health care and still had to pay for the treatment they needed in the United States. That is three people who I know personally, I have heard of countless more. Last week my ninety year old Grandmother was admitted for dehydration and malnutrition, yes she is old, but upon dismissing her to "free up a bed for the weekend" ( the Dr. exact words) they could not even be bothered to check her electrolytes. You may think that we have care whenever we need it, but we do not. It takes on average 4 weeks to get to see a Dr., emergency rooms waits are atrocious, and most people here do not even have a Family Dr. in which they can see regularly. Those a minor things when you factor in that if the Doctor makes a mistake or the hospital screws up they are protected by the government, no license is hardly ever pulled, there is absolutely NO accountability! It is the same if not worse at times as the publicly funded free clinics you have already. One thing, before jumping on the band wagon of "Government Fix All" to consider is; free is not always free and the price might be higher then you think.
Rudi Stettner
Rudi Stettner
 Moderator
7 months ago: Content Removed by RantRave Admin
Rudi Stettner
Rudi Stettner
 Moderator
7 months ago: To the contrary, they are enduring that the times of our lives that are racked with pain and infirmity will have dignity and meaning."

Should have read "To the contrary, they are enduring and persevering and in so doing lend the times of our lives that are racked with pain and infirmity dignity and meaning."

My apologies. I should have checked my work better.
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
7 months ago: I agree with Rudi that the decision to terminate the lives of our loved ones should not reside in any entity but the immediate family. The State should support that decision and the life of an individual should not be based upon finances.

http://medicare.ca/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/nanos-poll.pdf
is the recent poll which asked specifically if Canadians would prefer their plan or a private plan like the US's and 90% preferred their system.
In this poll only 82% preferred their system. There was 70% satisfaction with the Canadian system. There is some dissatisfaction but Fifty-five per cent thought it should be more public, only 12 per cent thought it should be private.
7 months ago: Every system has its flaws. Every system also bases how it treats its "customers" upon how much it will cost and who is paying. Doesn't matter if it is insurance companies or taxpayers, someone in the system is going to pull the plug on the outflow of money and that decision is going to cause someone to die or suffer, or both.

What we all want is for that person to do his/her job based upon good information.

As far as Isaiah is concerned, the information says his brain is damaged beyond a doctor's ability to repair and even though his body might grow and develop normally, he will not be a member of society. He will be a human body in a wheelchair being cared for 24/7/365/lifetime. He might even gain some cognitive ability, respond to a voice or sound, and grasp an object or some other involuntary expression that a portion of his brain functions.

It won’t be a life.

He will not bring joy to anyone by growing older and doing things a child is expected to do. His mere existence will not bring joy to his parents and/or relatives. If truth is to be told, he will be a burden. Possibly one they are willing to bear, but not one that should be forced upon them.

7 months ago: And then there is the financial burden. Who should be forced to pay that? Who should foot the bill for the thousands upon thousands of dollars that will be required just to get him from birth to home, if he can ever leave the hospital. And yes, it is forced, because the doctors have already made their diagnosis and the prognosis is that this baby cannot survive and live even a semblance of a normal life without constant life continuing care and taking the decision out of their hands and putting it to the courts could result in forced treatment or in other words, forced payment by the taxpayers.

I am not for continued (repeating) CONTINUED heroic efforts on brain dead or severely brain damaged humans. You think that is cruel and heartless? You don’t happen to have any relatives with this condition living with you or another close relative to base your opinions of matters like this upon do you? I do. One from birth (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anencephaly, she is one of the ones who looked almost normal, but lacks much of her brain and what parts she does have are damaged) and one from head/brain trauma (see previous posts or ask). Your next question will be “How do you want them to treat you if you ever get in this condition”, my family already knows to pull the plug, toss my carcass on a funeral pyre and scatter my ashes to the wind.
7 months ago: And then what would be your reaction, Mr/Ms Sixholdens, if unbeknownst to the doctors, your brain slowly awoke, and you heard them state the futility and worthlessness of your life inside your inert, immovable, damaged body? Heard your family tell them to pull the plug, and though unable to move your eyes, in your peripheral vision watched as they proceeded to kill you? Yes, KILL you! If we're being practical here, we may as well dispense with the euphemisms that make killing more palatable (i.e. "pulling the plug", "taking away his/her suffering", etc.).
7 months ago: It's Mr. and my reaction would be "Thank YOU!" and get on with your life, I've held you up long enough with my bodies failings and hope you live long and prosper. The heroics have already been done and there is no reason for bad timing remorse. I've made my plans, my family knows them, they are not idiots who can't make a educated decision if they have been given all the facts available.

And best of all, they have compassion.
7 months ago: Compassion to do what I asked and compassion to do what needs to be done to stop the prolonged suffering.

Yes you can call it killing, you can call it murder if you like, but you can't change the fact that in this situation, mine or Isaiah's, sweet mercy at the hands of family and friends is a heck of a lot better than days and weeks and months of testing and proding and watching and seizures and waiting and resusitation and more testing and proding and seizures and resustitation and antibiotics and drugs and failure after failure after failure to fix a broken body.

And I haven't even gotten in to the continued drain on a persons very essence, his will to live, his will to continue as an object to be cared for, his loss of dignity.

Have no fear MWC, I don't make such decisions and tell my family about them lightly, a lot of consideration goes into making this call for me and if it was another, for them as well. It's not like we are going to start pulling the plug after a few minutes or even a few days. Every chance will be given and every avenue explored. But to just make a blanket decision to spend millions of dollars for a person who has no chance in hell of being a person ever again? Or in this case, of ever even becomeing a person? No thanks, I have more compassion than that.

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.