Culture & Lifestyle

Rant

Australians trash Scientology: Blood Sex

Posted 26 months ago|31 comments|1,022 views
Written by
Scientology in Australia is once again being threatened by the wacko government of that country, but the low-grade Scientologists there aren't helping either.

Australian Senator Xenophon, citing claims raised by Australian Scientologists of coerced abortions within Scientology, has called for an enquiry.

In 1965 Scientology was comprehensively trashed in Australia by an earlier enquiry carried out by Justice Kevin Anderson.

Justice Anderson concluded "Scientology is evil; its techniques evil; its practice a serious threat to the community, medically, morally and socially; and its adherents sadly deluded and often mentally ill. "

Now, in 2009, Australia risks the same problems once again.

All of this happened in 1965 because useless Australian "Scientologists" failed to carry out L Ron Hubbard's specific instructions.

L Ron Hubbard said this: -

__________________________________________________________
Anyone proposing an investigation of or an "Enquiry" into Scientology must receive this reply and no other proposal:

"We welcome an investigation into (Mental Healing or whoever is attacking us) as we have begun one ourselves and find shocking evidence."

You can elaborate on the evidence we have found and lay it on thick attacking the attackers only.

NEVER agree to an investigation of Scientology. ONLY agree to an investigation of the attackers

This was the BIG error made in Victoria. I Okayed an Enquiry into all Mental healing. I ordered evidence on psychiatric murders to be collected. Non-compliance with these orders brought on the loss of Melbourne and the law in Victoria against Scientology. This was the non-compliance that began it. The original order I gave was relayed as "we welcome an Enquiry into Scientology . . ." or it was changed to that in Melbourne.

This is correct procedure:

(1) Spot who is attacking us.

(2) Start investigating them promptly for FELONIES or worse using own professionals, not outside agencies.

(3) Double curve our reply by saying we welcome an investigation of them.

(4) Start feeding lurid, blood sex crime actual evidence on the attackers to the press.

Don't ever tamely submit to an investigation of us. Make it rough, rough on attackers all the way.

L Ron Hubbard, HCOPL 15 February 1966

_______________________________________________


Yet Australian Scientologists are going down the same road they went down in 1965, only this time it's worse. Indeed, an Australian Scientology spokesperson attempted to throw American Scientology under the bus, by emphasizing that the crimes alleged against Scientology "couldn't happen in Australia", as if the Australian convict character was something better than pure American Scientology.

Australian Scientologists, if they wish to merit the name, have to stop distancing themselves from the mother Church and follow the words of L Ron Hubbard.

If Australian Scientologists find this too difficult, I will spell it our for them, exactly as L Ron Hubbard said it -

"We welcome an investigation into Senator Xenophon." "Start feeding lurid, blood sex crime actual evidence on Xenophon to the press. "

Let's see if they can try not to lose Melbourne again, with another disastrous mishandling of a disastrous enquiry.

-----------------
Check out the links to learn more about Scientology, Xenophon and the parlous state of Australian morals.
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
tamphex
tamphex
Australia
26 months ago: That's right, we're convicts. Tough as nails, butt kicking convicts who are taking *great joy* in dismantling The Cult of Scientology.
26 months ago: Scientology in the USA knew how to deal with Gabe Cazares - Operations Keeler and Italian Fog,

See how the convicts like that sort of toughness, Tamphex.
tamphex
tamphex
Australia
26 months ago: You wouldn't happen to be suggesting that the clams attempt to slander the Senator in a similar farce, would you Jack?
tamphex
tamphex
Australia
26 months ago: C'mon Jack, let loose a cutting retort and put this lowly Australian convict back in his place. Maybe you need to do the SCC again - or are you too busy combing the web to find my crimes?
Mecca  Anon
Mecca Anon
Clearwater, FL
26 months ago: Y' know Jack. For once I agree with you. The Scns have been acting wussy all over the place. Is this not the reason for the attacks? People are losing their fear and the moment they lose their fear is the moment suppressives gain the upper hand
26 months ago: Blimey Cobber, I don't know if you are talking about the Sydney Cricket Club or the Supreme Court of Canada. Putting an Australian convict back in his place, you say, Tamphex. Would that be a prison ship or a work gang?
26 months ago: Mecca Anon, they say that the Devil can quote scripture. You've hit the nail on the head. I see, however that you are from an up-tone, up-stat place, not the prison desert of the Outback, where they need that sort of insight.
tamphex
tamphex
Australia
26 months ago: You clams just aren't capable of holding a decent conversation on the internet without having to resort to childish behavior, are you? That's ok. You just leave that difficult stuff to us adults.
xenubarb
xenubarb
San Diego, CA
26 months ago: Yes, please apply the tech and do exactly what Ron says.

Every time you do, you look like complete nutters and right now, the media is watching.
26 months ago: That's the trouble, a lot of the time, Barb. People back away from the tech and LRH just because they fear looking like nutters. Of course you are going to look like a nutter when you are saving this sector of the Galaxy from degraded beings. There is no proscription on looking like a nutter in Scientology. No one would have got anything done - ever invented the Sea Org etc, if there was.
xenubarb
xenubarb
San Diego, CA
26 months ago: That's a good thing, Jack. If Scientologists cared about looking like nutters, Anonymous would have no epic video of their bat****tery on camera.

They really don't care, do they? Whether hissing profanities in a minor's ear like the "Reverend" John Carmichael of New York, or using the F word and swearing while acting as a representative like Tommy Davis, from jumping on couches and laughing maniacally on camera like Tom Cruise, or wildly flailing his arms like the OTVIII in San Jose, Scientologists provide stunning moments of epic lulz for the world to feed on.
Xenuphobe
Xenuphobe
Albania
26 months ago: I love your work, Jack.

One minor correction. Kevin Anderson was a QC, not a judge, at the time of the report. Legal convention is that he would be described "Kevin V. Anderson QC (as he then was)..."

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/%7Edst/Cowen/audit/andrhome.html
THE RONBOT HUNTER
THE RONBOT HUNTER
26 months ago: This is correct procedure:

(1) Spot who is attacking us. --

THE RONBOT HUNTER

(2) Start investigating them promptly for FELONIES or worse using own professionals, not outside agencies.

NONE EXIST UNLESS YOU INVENT THEM

(3) Double curve our reply by saying we welcome an investigation of them.

GOOD AND ALSO BRING A LAWSUIT TOO -- I NEED THE MONEY!

(4) Start feeding lurid, blood sex crime actual evidence on the attackers to the press.

EVER HEARD OF A NEGATIVE AVERMENT?

Don't ever tamely submit to an investigation of us. Make it rough, rough on attackers all the way.

I DARE YOU TO TRY. I WELCOME YOUR FAIR GAME ATTACKS.

L Ron Hubbard, HCOPL 15 February 1966
The Ronbot Hunter HCOP 27 November 2009
HCOP = "Hunter Communication Office Policy letter"

[If and When you make apologies for criminals or sociopaths, or corrupt governments and dirty Politicians or protect them or fail to expose the real criminals or real source or real cause of the problem, I will tell you off. I will not care who you are. To me you are fair game.]

THE RONBOT HUNTER
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED


26 months ago: The last time Australia got upset about Scientology, the Church came back with an investigation into (mental health or whatever). Chelmsford Private Hospital used deep sleep therapy, combined it with electroconvulsive therapy, and psychiatry was set back 50 years, according to one psychiatrist. Here's a wikipedia link about that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Sleep_Therapy#Australian_Chelmsford_scandal
It became a court case, the legislature passed laws that limited psychiatry's practice in Australia and psychiatry earned some more bad reputation.

But what critic would want to recognize what is actually happening, when there is a subject to criticize, 'eh?
MikeMercer
MikeMercer
Glenn Dale, MD
26 months ago: I believe the U.S.A. was founded by criminals too; Traitors if you asked George III.
That's the thing about law; taking someone elses bread may be petty theift or a life-saving act of heroic charity.
The outdated concept of good and evil is in some ways more usefull.
Back on topic: scientology is evil.
TheLegendTomWing
TheLegendTomWing
 Administrator
Philadelphia, PA
26 months ago: As a born-again RantRave Scientologist, i find your rant highly offensive. Ronnie is OUR savior, and you can't have him. I think Hitler or Stalin would be a close second though, if you'll have 'em.

na na na boo boo!
Frederick
Frederick
Canada
26 months ago: It sounds like Davey is on the ropes. Tommy is itching for a declare. Too bad that there is not a shred of democracy in the cult. Rantrave's own Terryeo could (and to a degree) is doing the job of holding the ARC triangle in place better than either of them. I bet he could do a mean job at couch jumping too.

Seriously, Terryeo, has Scientology ever made a mistake? Could you mention it? Discuss it? Could things actually be going wrong in Australia? How far have you investigated the situation? Watch the videos at xenutv.com . You may find them compelling.
26 months ago: Has a barber ever made a mistake as he cuts your hair? Has cashier ever made a mistake as he gives you change? Mistakes are possible. But society works because most of our systems work, most of the time.

xenubarb
xenubarb
San Diego, CA
26 months ago: "...society works because most of our systems work, most of the time. "

Yep. That's why Scientology is going to be investigated. Fraud, scams, and medical malpractice will not be tolerated by society.

Hey, heard from Uwe Stuckenbrock lately, Terryeo?
Oh, you haven't because HE DIED IN THE RPF!
26 months ago: Anonymous Terryeo, first you imply that Australia is an anti-psych place that can run just and effective government enquiries in to wrong deeds and then correct them.

Second you imply that Scientology might well be making mistakes like a bumbling barber or lackadaisical cashier. Barbers' or cashiers' mistakes can be corrected, but if they always blame the customer when they cut hair badly or take too much change, they are likely to lose their jobs or get investigated.

The transparent inescapable implication of your propaganda is that Scientology's 'careless mistakes' can be openly and justly investigated and corrected by the convicts of Australia. I'm not buying it.
Mark Tomles
Mark Tomles
FPO, AE
26 months ago: "Has a barber ever made a mistake as he cuts your hair? Has cashier ever made a mistake as he gives you change? Mistakes are possible. But society works because most of our systems work, most of the time."

What mistakes are you referring to, Terryeo? Are you aware of, or suspect any, mistakes within the australian scientology movement?
Mecca  Anon
Mecca Anon
Clearwater, FL
26 months ago: Mistakes! Scientology is a mistake, a big one too! What other business would make you buy expensive books, then come back years later saying "oops! The books are ALL WRONG! You have to buy them all over again!"
26 months ago: The books weren't intended to be mistakes when they were issued by L Ron Hubbard. They just became revealed as mistakes by Mr Miscavige later on. It's possible that the nest of SPs like the Kingpin, and the Joker, who have just been weeded out, introduced errors into the current books that will one day be discovered.
Mark Tomles
Mark Tomles
FPO, AE
26 months ago: you propose a very interesting concept, Jack- however, how is it that such "terrible" people could have risen to such a level within the organization?

I have a matter I would love to share with you privately, if you have time- mark.tomles@gmail.com
26 months ago: Scientology has always been particularly vulnerable to these bad people because of its nurturing, trusting and easygoing nature. Almost everyone who worked with LRH turned out to be Suppressive Persons in the end.

The character "Terryeo" claims to be a Scientologist for example, but is increasingly hostile to the Church in a sly and covert way, supporting the idea that there should be an Australian enquiry into Scientology mistakes.

I prefer to limit my discussions to public ones, Mark Tolmes, and no offense intended.
Mark Tomles
Mark Tomles
FPO, AE
26 months ago: None taken, perhaps another time you would be willing to discuss some of the other offenses that stem from the organization- and what you're doing about it. Especially how it is, as I asked before, that "SP's" are able to rise to positions of authority. But I can't blame you for avoiding the issue- it's a touchy one.

But I digress.

It would seem that membership in this organization would cause one to be MORE vulnerable- or does it simply attract those that are already susceptible to deceit? I suppose that's a chicken and the egg question, there.
Mecca  Anon
Mecca Anon
Clearwater, FL
26 months ago: Jack H. Remington sez -

"The books weren't intended to be mistakes when they were issued by L Ron Hubbard. They just became revealed as mistakes by Mr Miscavige later on. It's possible that the nest of SPs like the Kingpin, and the Joker, who have just been weeded out, introduced errors into the current books that will one day be discovered."

Oh stuff and nonsense. I think it's safe to say that Rathbun and Rinder had little to do with publishing the earlier books. It seems to me that they were far too busy chasing after Scientology's vast legal entanglements to be quietly editing errors into Hubbard's books.
26 months ago: You might be underestimating SPs, Mecca Anon. They are the cause of all big problems in the world.
26 months ago: Mark Tomles, it typically happens that the SPs are discovered only after they have been in top management for many years. It's part of the process of detecting them.
Mark Tomles
Mark Tomles
FPO, AE
26 months ago: it just me, or does that sound like a pretty poor process? You're saying that someone, anyone, can be an SP and rise to a position of authority within the organization, and also do a great deal of damage to people AND the organization itself, before they are able to be discovered? That sounds like a significantly flawed process...
26 months ago: But it is workable.

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.