Written by
Today, an alarming editorial from the Washington Times suggested that President Obama was "risking public safety on airlines in the name of an anti-gun ideology."
Sounds serious, doesn't it?
But if you take a breath and examine the editorial, you'll find a lot of weasel words: "defenseless," "anti-gun," terrorist." The fact that the Unification Church, a noted cult, founded and currently backs the Washington Times doesn’t help its credibility, either.
Let's look at the facts. In 2002, Congress decided to allow commercial pilots to carry firearms, despite initial resistance from both the Bush administration and some airline companies.
But even though it became legal, not many pilots signed up for target practice. According to a BBC article, only 46 pilots showed up for the first training group. This was after Republican senators had predicted that 30,000 pilots would be armed by 2007.
It's hard to find statistics online, but I estimate about 1-3 percent of pilots have completed the training and may have guns in the cockpit. According to the National Air Traffic Controllers Association, more than 87,000 flights are in the skies in the United States on any given day. One-third, or 29,000 are commercial carriers. The odds that your plane’s pilot is packing heat? Extremely low.
My opinion? I think the editorial says some federal training funds are going to be redirected for supervisory roles. And since the pilot-arming program isn't getting much use, I don't think there's any indication our 2nd Amendment rights are in jeopardy quite yet. (As of this posting, the Obama administration hasn't commented on the editorial.)