News & Politics

Rant

America’s Love Hate Relationship with Democracy

Posted 14 months ago|9 comments|504 views
Protesting For Freedom
VIDEOS
Written by
Altruist
Eugene, OR
Americans like to think our country is the first and greatest Democracy and that we are Democracy's number one fan and booster.

The reality is a bit different. Often if our ideology or interests conflict with Democracy we will throw Democracy under the bus.

Iran conducted free and open democratic elections in 1951 and elected Dr. Mohammad Mosedegh as prime minister, while in office he introduced many progressive social reforms, and it was believed that Iran could act as an example for other countries in the area to spread democracy. But then he made the mistake of nationalizing what would become BP (British Petroleum) thinking that the people of Iran should benefit from the nation's oil resources more than England's tycoons.

At Britain's request, Kermit Roosevelt (Teddy's grandson) directed America's CIA Project Ajax, which overthrew the prime Minister and installed the Shaw. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_A...

This intrusion angered the entire Middle-East and resulted in the overthrow of the Shaw, the rise of the ayatollahs and much of the terrorism in the world today.

But at the time America was very impressed that we could overthrow an entire nation with just a few spies and a bundle of money.

Flush with this victory we embarked on the effort to thwart Democracy in IndoChina.

France had just lost their colonies after an extended popular revolution. As part of the peace accords Indochina would be divided up into Laos, Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam, which was temporarily divided, would be reunited after democratic elections. According to the Pentagon Papers, our CIA found out that 80% of the people of Vietnam would vote for their popular revolutionary hero Ho Chi Minh, so we prevented the elections and reunification and installed a puppet in the South. After 20 years of war, the destruction of the region and between 1.5 and 3 million deaths, we realized that the will of the people is difficult to thwart and we gave the country back to the people who live there. http://www.vietnam-about.com/forums/show...%29

We also overthrew and intervened in many Latin American countries, so Chiquita and other corporations could exploit those countries. (Thus the term Banana Republic)
http://academic.evergreen.edu/g/grossmaz...

In almost all of America's interventions, the corporate conservative culture is what drove the actions. We overthrew governments to wrest the power away from a government that was trying to help their people, and replaced it with a puppet government willing to make deals that sold that nation's resources to major corporations. These puppet governments result in massive corruption where the few get fabulously wealthy while the majority of the people suffer. To maintain this state of inequality the dictator usually resorts to a heavy handed military or police state that cruelly suppresses all dissent, and eliminates most freedom from the people.

This forms a pressure cooker of resentment and occasionally when the anger increases sufficiently they can overthrow their government.

The United States does this because that is the way the free market works. For major corporations, bribing lawmakers and lobbying for the overthrow of governments, is simply another investment. Once a puppet dictator is installed the government continues to support these autocratic regimes and conveniently turns a blind eye to the atrocities and human rights abuses committed because it is in the best interests of the corporations that are doing business with them. The public is told that we support these countries because they are loyal opponents to Communism, or radical Islam, or in the case of Iraq, just because Saddam was a bad guy. These are all just fig leaves to cover up the real reasons we tolerate tyrants, but there is generally an ulterior motive.

There has been a sustained movement by the people who want better living conditions. It is becoming increasingly difficult for autocratic regimes to keep the cover on the pressure cooker while the poor continuously get poorer and the rich to get richer.

In Feb. 1986 the people overthrew Marcos in the Philipines. In Nov. 1989 the people brought down the wall in Berlin. In May 1998 the people threw out Suharto in Indonesia forming the most populous Muslim democracy.

In June 1989 The Polish Union's Solidarity Movement brought about their Freedom through peaceful protests. This is in marked contrast to the bloody Romanion revolution that eliminated Nicolae Ceausescu In Dec. 1989.

In April 1994 Peaceful protests brought about the end of Apartheid in Africa.

In 2003 there was the Rose revolution in Georgia. In 2004 there was the Orange Revolution in the Ukrain, in 2005 the Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan.

This year the people peacefully overthrew the rulers in Tunisia and Egypt. In Libya it is not so peaceful but Col Muammar Gaddafi's days are clearly numbered. Who will be next? Will it be Jordan, Yemin, Sudan? Are the days of the dictators numbered? http://arashhejazi.com/en/2011/01/iran-t...

While there has been a relentless demands for better living conditions, and wages for the people and less power to the corporations that prey on them, the inequality between the poor and the super rich continues to grow. The people of the world are learning how to organize. They are realizing that they have rights, dignity and power.

Meanwhile here in America we are going in the other direction. The corporate Conservative culture is working to make the rich richer with million dollar tax breaks. Half of the corporations pay no taxes at all and corporations like Exxon while making greater profits than any corporation has ever made in the history of the world, the Corporate Conservatives are fighting to allow them huge billion dollar subsidies. While the military spends more money than the rest of the world combined, the military Industrial Complex's paid stooges in Congress refuse to cut even the most blatant waste in the military while taking the food from the mouths of babies (WIC) .

The same Corporate conservative culture that is now under attack for exploiting people all over the world and denying them freedom, are in this country attacking the poor, the middle class, the women and the minorities, and they are taking away the people's right to organize. Their propaganda machines have convinced people that the main problem is our hard working teachers and civil servants, and have diverted their attention from the real villains who make thousands of times as much money as our union workers. It is the Bankers, the Hedge fund managers, the derivative traders and the international corporations who moved our jobs to China who actually caused the global economic collapse, and who are poised to do so again.

The corporate conservative culture hates Democracy. They have successfully crippled democracy here with the Citizen's United case which allows corporations to spend unlimited amounts of money to steal elections without having to disclose how much they are spending. Now they are poised to kill Democracy by eliminating our right to organize.

Will Americans be the next to fight for their freedom and rights? They are peacefully fighting for their rights now in Wisconsin and in Indiana, and it may spread all over the country. http://www.adbusters.org/blogs/adbusters...

EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
14 months ago: I think time will tell that, just like the Russian revolution was financed by Wall Street and wealthy bankers, these "revolutions" will lead to more profits by global corporations such as Monsanto, and power brokers such as George Soros.

"It turns out that the new Egyptian Constitution has already been drafted, not by the Egyptian people, but by the very US-backed protesters who brought about regime change in the first place. A Reuters report quoted an opposition judge, who had been hiding-out in Kuwait until Mubarak's ousting, as having said civil society groups had already produced several drafts and a new constitution could be ready in a month."
http://powerpointparadise.com/blog/2011/...
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
14 months ago: "These "civil society" groups include the Arabic Network for Human Rights Information openly funded by George Soros' Open Society Institute and the Neo-Con lined NED funded Egyptian Organization for Human Rights. It appears that while the International Crisis Group may be turning out the strategy, and their trustee ElBaradei leading the mobs into the streets, it is the vast array of NGOs their membership, including Soros, fund that are working out and implementing the details on the ground."

http://powerpointparadise.com/blog/2011/...
14 months ago: Basically, if the corporations can't get into a country and use its citizens to extract their natural resources for western consumers in the first world, then the US government is asked to step in and help. This help comes like this: when the corporations ask for some help corralling the colonies, the US government is there, kinda like a business partner to depose the popular leader who puts its citizens first, and replace it with one who will do the bidding of the corporations. This is always a corruption, where the new, corporate friendly ruler becomes fabulously wealthy for the immoral deed of being a slavemaster to his own people.

What's terrible, is this kind of thing is now being done internally in the USA. America is so big now, there are cities, counties and states that are using political pressure to put the thumb on the working people just like abroad. It has been going on, but kicked into gear once the great recession started: when you're hurting and down, it's easier to keep you that way than if your still up and fighting.

You could even see this at the federal level, where perhaps Obama is perceived by the corporate right as one of those leaders from another country that needs to be deposed and replaced with one of their own, a right wing neo-con. America is basically turning on itself, where the wealthy use the government they pay dearly for, lobbying and getting candidates elected, to control the masses so they don't get uppity.

I wrote a rant today about how laws are made up to control people, and it seems fitting in this context.
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
14 months ago: I think that The Egyptian people were not manipulated by outside corporate interests. It caught everyone including our government by surprise, but the fact is that most corporate interrests, like the Koch brothers with all of their oil money were invested in the Mubarack Government and were opposed to the revolution because revolution means instability. Why would they want to overthrow their own puppett?

George Soros does use his billions to foster democracy and human rights, and when the Egyptians do produce a new Constitution I sincerely hope that there is input from Human Rights Organizations. That doesn't mean they are running the show.

El Baradei did support the protesters and was arrested, but he did'nt control the protests, He was probably the most well known though. He was recognized by the army and it may turn out that he had a hand in the military not turning on the people, but he is not trusted by the Egyptians because he lived outside of Egypt.

El Baradei is not controlled by the neocons. In fact he was hated by the neocons because as head of the IAEA he stood up to BUsh and the rest of the neocons and spoke the truth that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and spoke out against the invasion.

El Baradei is interested in helping form the new government and is even interested in leading it. I think he would be a good leader and good for the country because he would make certain Egypt would remain a secular nation.

Plutonmister I agree that the Corporate right does consider Obama and the Democrats, the enemy and that is why all of the big international corporations and the Chamber of Commerce spent 95% of their massive war chest to put right wing radicals into Congress. It is also why the same corporate interests have declared war on the unions.
14 months ago: "There has been a sustained movement by the people who want better living conditions." ?? You think they killed Ceausescu for better living conditions?

People want Liberty, not "better living conditions".

People want Liberty and Prosperity and Persuit of Happiness. That takes money.
So Free men would persue money by coming together in like minded groups to provide products and services for those who willingly pay for them.- We call them "corporations".
[Money does not come from governments except in collectivist states.]

Summary: You argue against people working toward personal wealth, asking that they arrange/beg for handouts from a collectivist state. You and Stalin and Mao share a philosophy.

I'll take Liberty for $500, Alex.
14 months ago: No one is saying you cannot organize. Just don't force others to be subservient to your organization.

People have a "right to work".
14 months ago: Unions Delende Est.

Sic Semper Tyrannis. Always.
14 months ago: Public sector unions are organized against what/whom?

Public sector unions are organized against... "we the people" who employ them.

Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
14 months ago: The unions are the only bulwark against the corporate conservative regressives who have taken away our Democracy.

Unions don't force anyone to be subservient they only work for better working conditions and their efforts raise all boats.

The unions in Wisconsin brought us the 5 day work week and workers compensation. The unions have brought us the child labor laws, safe working conditions and most of the benefits that differentiate us from the Chinese from 10 years ago. Now if the republicans are successful at rolling back all progress in this country while the Chinese are making progress in improving the worker's plight, you might be better off moving to China. The Free Market Dream World.

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.