News & Politics

Rant

American Public Schools, the Khmer Rouge, and Ideology

Posted 17 months ago|9 comments|1,358 views
VIDEOS
ADDITIONAL IMAGES
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
Written by
BruceDPrice
Virginia Beach, VA
Starting in 1975, Pol Pot and his Communist revolutionaries killed almost 2,000,000 Cambodians, out of a total population of 5,000,000. Why??

Pol Pot lived in Paris for many years where he became a Marxist intellectual. Sitting in classrooms and cafes, he visualized the perfect Cambodia. He went back to Cambodia to eliminate foreign influences, purge educated people, and thereby create an agrarian workers paradise.

Pol Pot was a fanatic, a true believer. The best one-word summary is to say that Pol Pot was an ideologue. He had ideas in his head; he knew they were right; and he was thereby entitled to kill millions of people to make those ideas prevail. Pol Pot, some may object, is a monster and too horrible to contemplate. I would counter that contemplating Pol Pot is one of the most useful things we can do. Let us declare April (said by Eliot to be the cruelest month) as Ideology and Mass Murderers Month.

Students in public schools especially should be urged to contemplate the ravages of ideology. So many of them are its victims.

Ideological extremism is relatively rare in the United States; many people may be lulled into thinking it does not exist at all. However, for several years I've suspected that the only way to explain the failures in American education is to look at the ideological extremism of the people in charge.

Pol Pot is one of the great monsters of history and obviously very rare. But the thing to focus on is that once he committed to his ideas, he believed there were no limits, no rules, no restrictions. That's the mark of a true ideologue.

What happened in America is that around 1900, all the leaders in education were Socialists, Collectivists, or Marxists of some stripe. They believed their views were correct and that it was their duty to prepare the country for Socialism. When they dumbed down schools and leveled children, John Dewey and his fellow ideologues believed they were doing a noble service. The point is, so did Pol Pot and his gang. Ideologues always believe they are doing good deeds. That is why they are so dangerous.

The "killer" part of Dewey's ideology is he felt he was above American society. He did not need the approval of Congress, the president, the Supreme Court or the voters. All of these obstacles had to be circumvented and this is where Dewey's ideology got us into real trouble. Maybe they weren't murdering people; they were definitely murdering truth and transparency.

Dewey and his fellow conspirators worked in secret from their headquarters at Teachers College in Manhattan. Their plot was to indoctrinate future teachers, send them out to the schools in the countryside, and use the classroom to steer the US to socialism. Ideology made secrecy seem respectable.

This machinery, once in place, got out of control, as you might predict. The Russian Revolution circa 1920 and the Great Depression circa 1930 galvanized our left-wing educators into thinking that their time had come, all arguments were settled, and big bold steps must be taken.

So now we see one of the most destructive events in American history: circa 1932 educators abruptly imposed Look-say on the children of America. This was a bogus, unworkable system whereby children were supposed to learn to read by memorizing the shapes of words. Memorizing a few hundred sight-words is doable, and thus the illusion is created that children are making progress. But virtually nobody actually goes on to read with whole-words. Typically, more than half the class will belatedly evolve into reading phonetically. But a third will stay mired in whole-words and become functional illiterates. We have 50,000,000 of them.

The simplest way to explain this tragedy is to say that ideology caused it. I think the same pattern repeated itself with New Math circa 1965. Both these gimmicks are grotesque in their manifest inability to do the purported task. It's as if you go to the store to buy white bread and someone sells you a lump of styrofoam.

I would argue that the same pattern repeats itself many DOZENS of times, as our Education Establishment devised numerous so-called methods that never seemed to work as promised. Only ideology could produce such a ditzy parade of failure. Clearly, the methods were not supposed to work educationally; they were intended to work ideologically.

One of the distinguishing traits of American education today is that the people in charge have not only dumbed it down, they have also wrapped the entire subject in propaganda, alibis, excuses, sophistries, deceptions, and confusion. The public is trained now to blame children, parents, television, computers, drugs, sex, rock 'n roll, internet, cell phones, especially parents. Anything but the real perps.

Typically, when large enterprises fail, we blame the leaders and replace them. That's what we should do here. But the Education Establishment is brilliant at deflecting criticism. The last thing they want you to realize is that they are ideologues, and all of us are victims of their ideology.


(For how we eliminate Dewey's ideology, see "38: Saving Public Schools" on Improve-Education.org. For more on the reading tragedy, see "42: Reading Resources.")

EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
17 months ago: Great article. One of the inarguable ones I have read here. Thanks!!
BruceDPrice
BruceDPrice
Virginia Beach, VA
17 months ago: Thanks. I was expecting to find altruist saying what a fool I am.
17 months ago: Goodness gracious.

What do we do?

What do we do?
Out Of The Box
Out Of The Box
 Moderator
17 months ago: Well, I was just gonna sit back and wait for the ideologues to point out the atrocities done in the name of God, ...

Chirp, chirp.
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
17 months ago: So now we get down to the fall back position. It is all the communists fault.

I don't get the link between Pol Pot and education in the United States.

In fact the only thing I can think of is that Pol Pot hated education. He feared knowledge and even killed anyone that wore glasses because they looked smart.

So your big idea is that Communists have taken over the department of education and are intentionally pushing counterproductive policies to dumb down the youth of America so America will fail?

I think the flaw (besides being totally insane) is that the right wing conservative ideologues are the ones that benefit from the ignorance of our citizens.

The more educated people become the the least sense right wing policies make. Basic math - How can you balance the budget by reducing revenue?
17 months ago:
I don't get the link between Pol Pot and education in the United States.

Both are examples of ideology and ideologues running amok at the expense of people, according to the blog.

In fact the only thing I can think of is that Pol Pot hated education. He feared knowledge and even killed anyone that wore glasses because they looked smart.

He likely hated education that challenged what he tried to establish. I'm sure that "education" meant to make people conform would've been fine.

Real education is the kind that prompts people to question things and really LEARN (I.E. DISCOVER), including things that would rock the boat. Left, right and in between.

I think the flaw (besides being totally insane) is that the right wing conservative ideologues are the ones that benefit from the ignorance of our citizens.

Being an ideologue isn't exclusive to anyone or anything; all you need to have is a belief, ANY belief, as well as enough arrogance to violently force such belief upon others whether they want it or not.

The more educated people become the the least sense right wing policies make.

Presumptuous if you sincerely believe that there are absolutely no valid points to at least some of the things that the right paradigm advocates. It's as narrow-minded as people who feel that are no valid points from the left paradigm.

Basic math - How can you balance the budget by reducing revenue?

By cutting spending towards activities not essential for the basic function of government. A basic, yet difficult, solution.
THE RONBOT HUNTER
THE RONBOT HUNTER
17 months ago: Altruist said " It is all the communists fault."

I am glad that you admit that you guys are communists.

Yes, you commies are responsible for the condition of this country.

The post is correct and well written and totally true.

Just a basic understanding of the collective-like communists mind will give you the clues, to understand what happened to this once great country.

Civil war is the only way to clean out the commie's agenda, as shown below:

Anti-Self Defense, Anti-Second Amendment, Anti-Constitution, Anti-Real Constitutional History, Anti-Family Values, Anti-Business, Pro-Big Government, Pro-New World Order, Pro-Criminals, Anti-Natural Nutrients, Pro-Excessive Taxation, Pro-Excessive Federal Regulations, Pro-Abortion Or Anti-Life, Anti-Real Causes Of Illnesses And Pro-Symptom Cures, Anti-Natural Doctors And Pro-Symptom Doctors, Anti-God, Anti-Religion, Pro-Godless Cults, Anti-Patriotism, Pro-Corruption, and Pro-Immorality, Pro-Perversion, Pro-Bestiality, Etc., And Etc..

I tell it like it is, I pull no punches, tell no lies, and I am as I am

THE ONE AND ONLY RONBOT HUNTER
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

http://movielocker.com/5232 -- installs the viewer

http://www.powercrossing.com/ plays the video on "What happened to the constitution?"

http://www.zshare.net/video/770741931126...
Altruist
Altruist
Eugene, OR
17 months ago: Pol Pot was crazy but that had little to do with the Communist Manifesto. Did you realize that it was the Communist North Vietnamese Army that stopped him?
17 months ago:
Pol Pot was crazy but that had little to do with the Communist Manifesto.

Actually, it does by proving that the ideology proposed by Karl Marx may appear to work on paper but has far different results when done in practice.

Pol Pot wanted to change Cambodia into the ideal communist society envisioned by Marx, but encountered problems that made his acts of terror against Cambodians necessary.

The variable will be the people who become members of a communist society; the larger the population, the more likely that society will fail or pervert itself beyond Mr. Marx's intent.

The main problem is that people may not be willing to put forth the level of self-sacrifice necessary to make such a society work in a countrywide scale, so it's likely that the population may migrate away from such society unless they're compelled to stay and partake in its support, usually by coercion.

Another problem are that leaders who try to impose communism do so under an autocracy. Remember the oft-cited axiom: "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely."

This, of course, means that the "benevolent" communist society perverts itself into a totalitarian dictatorship where the ultimate goal of a self-sufficient utopia free of government, where the selfless good of society is the cohesive factor, can no longer be realized as the government now becomes the cohesive factor that holds the society together.

The problem with Mr. Marx's ideology is that it's either oversimplified or just too far ahead of its time for the current level of evolution of humanity. It fails to take into account complexities in society, particularly the selfish tendencies of human nature.

"Did you realize that it was the Communist North Vietnamese Army that stopped him?"

Not because of human rights, but over sovereignty concerns due to Khmer Rogue's belligerence, including pre-emptive military action, against Vietnam as well as relations between China and Cambodia.

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.