News & Politics

Rant

Against Democracy: How America Created a Radical Iran Part 1

Posted 18 months ago|4 comments|852 views
Written by
Colorado
Westcliffe, CO
This week United Nations started to squeeze the Iranian Republic just a little more and further increasing the control of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad over the people of Iran. The reason for the newest wave of sanctions is centered on the disputed Iranian nuclear program and the inability for Iran or its western opponents to come to a consensus. Fiery rhetoric has been the weapon of choice for American politicians towards the defiant Middle Eastern country and most American probably agree that the Iran is a danger to peace. However, only President Obama has briefly hinted that the monster that has become Iran was created by the United States. At some point the U.S. public is going to have to reap what its leaders sowed so many years ago and hopefully it will be a lesson how our empire is almost never a defender of democracy.

The battle for Iranian democracy is one of the most heroic and tragic histories in the 20th century. In 1906 a rebellion outside of the British Embassy was able to persuade the middle and trading class of Tehran to form a Parliament. The aging Shah had tried to stop the constitution rebellion in 1905 but had become sick and was near death when the first Iranian parliament was formed. The parliament moved quickly and modeled their new constitutional monarchy after Belgium. The Shah signed the constitution into law and died five days later. However, the new democracy was short lived and in 1907 exiled royalty swayed the Russian and British Empires to invade and control Iran for its oil reserves. Russian and British control would remain in place until 1950.

Mohammad Mosaddegh was an aristocrat from Iran that passionately opposed the interventions by the Russian and British powers. In 1951 he was elected prime minister by a new Iranian parliament and quickly nationalized the oil industry in Iran. The main reason for British and Russian interventions had been oil and the puppet shah government gave extremely favorable terms to a British oil company that would later become British Petroleum. Mosaddegh wanted to use the oil to increase the Iranian budget to modernize the impoverished nation. When the British government refused to accept the terms of the new Iranian democracy it blockaded oil exports from Iran.

Mosaddegh cut the Shah's powers drastically and assumed control of the military after a protest in Tehran. However, his democratic actions were being drastically undercut due to the British oil blockade and the country was suffering severe economic depression due to the lack of oil sales. Britain was extremely bitter over their loss of control of the Iran oil industry and the oil blockade was not bringing the crisis to a quick conclusion. The United States had been in favor of Iranian democracy because of Mosaddegh's open hate of socialism and communism but as Britain became increasingly desperate to regain control of Iran Winston Churchill appealed to the new President of the United States, Dwight D Eisenhower.

Winston Churchill told his old war ally General Eisenhower that Mosaddegh was moving towards communism. Being the height of the cold war that was all the United States needed to reverse its support of Iran and denounced Iran's policies. The CIA was given almost unlimited monetary backing to bribe the Shah and the Iranian military to create a coup d'etat. The CIA hired criminals and tribal strongmen to stage massive protests in Tehran and over 300 people died in these fake revolts. The bribed military leaders than deployed to ensure peace and arrested Mosaddegh and held him accountable for the revolt. Mosaddegh was found guilty buy the CIA agents and was held under house arrest for the rest of his life. The unpopular and oppressive Shah returned in 1953 and quickly made deals with American and British oil companies with the urging of CIA agents. In trade for almost all of Iran's oil the CIA funded the Shah's oppressive military and secret police force. The CIA had single handedly crushed the only democracy in Asia Minor, for oil.

As for the 1979 Iranian revolution we all know about the hostage of the American embassy workers. The new Iranian republic was democratically elected but much more aggressive and radical compared to Mosaddegh. The chance to support a real and peaceful democracy in Iran was supplanted for oil. We now have to face a radical Iranian Republic that hates America more than it hated the Shah and is trying to create nuclear weapons. Who knows how much more peaceful the Middle East could have been if we had supported Mosaddegh?

Americas should be ashamed of our governments dealings with Iran, because like it or not, we gave and continue to give President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad an enemy that threatens the Iranian people which he uses to oppress the people of Iran. Instead of recognizing our mistakes Americans iclaim the reason Iran hates us is because we are a democracy, that Iran hates our freedom, that Iran hates Christians. No, Iran hates us because we killed their democracy single handedly. In part two, I will describe how America helped kill millions of Iranians in retaliation to the 1979 revolution.

Sometimes America makes me sick and I am ashamed to be part of this "great democratic nation."



Sources:

A Concise history of Iran, Saeed Shirazi

The Devil We Know: Dealing with the New Iranian Superpower, Robert Baer.

Mohammad Mosaddegh and the 1953 coup in Iran, Mark J. Gasiorowski and Malcolm Byrne
EMAIL|FLAG THIS POST
COMMENTS
18 months ago: Unfortunately this article is not about Iran's government.

The article is about various historical influence. Now, it doesn't hurt anything to study history. But if you do it is wiser to keep in mind what was going on before your little segment of historical argument.

Iran (the geographical area of the planet now called Iran) existed long before, it was a very popular stop on trade routes hundreds and even thousands of years ago. If you want to look at how the area organized itself to encourage trade, you can do that. But that isn't the author's interest.

Then, finally, if you want to understand how things work in Iran today, you need a broader view than given here. Rather than looking outside of Iran's borders, to understand Iranian life, you want to look within Iranian borders.

Most of Iran's people are under 30 years of age. Most of them are educated. Democracy exists and in theory a woman could become Iran's president. But in actuality. religion rules and over rules in Iran. This is because the people of Iran have made it that way and hold that in place. Not because Winston Churchill smoked cigars.
Colorado
Colorado
Westcliffe, CO
18 months ago: No, this article is not about Iran's government but only because my focus right here is on American involvement with Iran in the past.

I understand (as much as a recent history grad student can) that Iran has one of the richest histories in the world. Most people in America do not understand that most of the people of Iran are Persian, not Arab.

On your last comment I also agree that the people themselves have to make choice and no foreign power can make a move towards democracy for them. The French, the English and the United States all had to stand up and make a choice.

That said, the people in Iran in 1951 made that move and despite the fact that their rebellion was crippling their economy, they continued to fight for democracy. Instead of the U.S supporting Iran just like France had supported a young America, we crushed them and installed a dictator that would give us cheap oil.

The people of Iran in 1979 were desperate to free themselves from the Shah, the problem with desperation is that often a radical leader is pick rather than a solid democracy. Russia in 1917, Germany in the early 1930's, Italy in the 1920's, Cuba in 1950's. All of these countries had a choice, and they picked radical leaders out of desperation.

Trust me when I say that I do not condone the leadership of Iran, but I understand it. I also wish America had stood up for the values of democracy, freedom and the right to choose. the US stripped Iran of all three.

Thanks for the comment.
18 months ago: You point appears to be something like this.

The poor, helpless people of Iran are not responsible for themselves, not responsible for their government, and most certainly, not responsible for their history.

On this foundation of irresponsibility you then prove it with a pile recent historical building blocks. And one of those is America's involvement.

And you conclude then, "America has not stood up for the values of democracy, freedom and the right to choose (In Iran), but instead, has stripped Iran of all three.

That's your position, and is what you just stated, is it not?

Whereas my position is, Iranians are responsible for their situation. They have democracy and there are elections for most government positions. Most of the population is literate. They are neither helpless nor illiterate.

While you point a finger of blame at the USA, I attempt to clarify Iran, today. Iran is a working country, has some internal strife and isolates itself from the rest of the world by its own choices. Its people might be somewhat foolish, but they are educated and have a reasonable standard of living. And it is by their own efforts they have achieved literacy. Their closing of Iranian borders and infatuation with religion brought literacy and a better standard of living.
Colorado
Colorado
Westcliffe, CO
18 months ago: You are correct that the Iranians chose their own path and will do so in the future. However, America has had trade embargoes since 1979 and many of the changes Iranians would like to see cannot be accomplished due to unfair and idiotic policies of the United States.

In fact, Iran has done an incredible job for itself considerings the many trade and military attacks by the US and military allies. We created the hate Iranians have towards the United States.

Then, we all seem surprised that the Iranians are so hard to deal with, if I was an Iranian I would support a radical leader if he promised safety from the great American Empire that had hundreds of thousands of troops on both sides of my home country.

We also have to remember that America helped kill hundreds of thousands of Iranians in the Iran-Iraq war. When Iraq started using gas to kill 100,000 Iranian civilians America said nothing while continuing to support Iraq with military training, planes, satellite feeds, tanks and everything else.

I hate America and I live here. I know none of what I stated will make a dent in the common belief that America = Good and Iran =Evil. When it should read, America=Bad --> Iran= Aggressive

Post a Comment
Sign in or sign up to post a comment.